garnet13aj
Active Member
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/12/sc...=1&oref=slogin
I just learned about this 2 months ago in my intro biology class, except at that time they didn't have the data about the age of this skull that was found about 50 years ago. I think this is really exciting, the missing link to connect respected scientific theories to reality.
What do you think?
I just learned about this 2 months ago in my intro biology class, except at that time they didn't have the data about the age of this skull that was found about 50 years ago. I think this is really exciting, the missing link to connect respected scientific theories to reality.
What do you think?