bigger tank?

[fixed]

I have a 55 gallon fowlr tank now. I'm itching to get something around 200. How much better is a 200 for water quality and fish habitat? (thus, this post in the Fish forum).
Other than the initial cost, is there any downside to a larger tank?
For bonus points, I'd love to hear some suggestions for equiping it. Thanks.

 

[joker_ca]

bigger is always better-stable water parameters, more space for fish
but you'll have to spend more for water changes and any chemicals you add also a pain to move so pick a spot where you really want it

 

[mbrands]

Originally Posted by Fixed
Other than the initial cost, is there any downside to a larger tank?
Keep in mind the weight. Are you in an apartment or planning to put it on a second floor? I'd also say water changes (as joker said) and top offs for evaporation would be more time consuming.

 

[1journeyman]

Cost of lighting... that's the biggest friggin downside...
Seriously, lighting for a reef tank gets insane. For a FOWLR a 200 would be sweet.
Cost of setup is going to be a punch to the wallet (200-300 pounds of live rock ain't cheap)
Overall though, the bigger the better.