Originally Posted by
sickboy
http:///forum/post/3247399
I'm kinda for the plan seeing as how we are a little behind (ok, quite a bit behind) other countries, but this is funny:
http://cafehayek.com/2010/03/says-it-all.html
What a load, satellite high speed Internet costs under a 100 bucks a month now. The only downside is the lag of about a second means you can't play on xbox live... Then don't get me started on the "turning down jobs". Assuming the article is correct, at it would cost about 300 installation. She's turning down jobs because she doesn't have 300 dollars of needed equipment? But it isn't correct, they'll install it free, add 10 bucks a month on your bill, charge you a 100 dollar activation fee, 25 dollars to ship the hardware and you're up and running...
then don't forget about internet through your cell phone. You can use your phone as a dongle and get DSL speeds cheating the system and using that same dial up number and 50 dollar software...
IF you want something, go out and buy it, that is the American way, if you don't, then don't. Don't spend billions of dollars to force people who don't want it just because they aren't doing what everyone else is doing...
Ok I'm done, I think my position is obvious.
"Yes it would be nice. It’s especially nice when someone else pays for it. Government thrives by handing out free lunches. The problem is that the bills keep coming and we don’t have enough money to give out all that free food. Someone needs to make choices and trade0ffs. Kelli Fields made her choice. Maybe that tells us something about the relative urgency of the problem." well said