hunt
Active Member
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/03/28...ivity-midwest/
I just dont get it
I just dont get it
Militia Accused of Plotting War on U.S. Government
- Thread starter hunt
- Start date
darthtang aw
Active Member
They look like the cast to a Rob Zombie flick.
Paramilitary traing? Come on, what did it involve? Hooking up the trailer home to the Pick up truck? Curling 12 OZ. cans...because that is about how physically fit these folks are..........
Paramilitary traing? Come on, what did it involve? Hooking up the trailer home to the Pick up truck? Curling 12 OZ. cans...because that is about how physically fit these folks are..........
stdreb27
Active Member
these turkeys got arrested almost a month ago... There is a group around here called the Republic of Texas, that claims we weren't legally absorbed into the United States. And they openly declared war on the USA. Every once in a while they'll pop into the news. I remember a few years back when Dallas PD called everyone in because they said they were gonna invade dallas or something like that...
fishtaco
Active Member
These people are a joke until something like Oklahoma city happens. My own thoughts are these people are a bunch of cowards who claim to hold the Constitution sacred, yet really just hide behind it to make it easier to hate. Once again it is also not the best way to guarantee gun rights not being taken away when a group like this running around and rather than their fellow gun owners and other militias getting involved and for instance I.D. wackos like this and refuse to sell to them at gun shops or shows, nothing is done until the Feds have to step-in and then it just adds fuel to the fire for the rest of these more radical militias.
Fishtaco
Fishtaco
scottnlisa
Member
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Plain and simple.
scsinet
Active Member
Originally Posted by scottnlisa
http:///forum/post/3258640
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Plain and simple.
As long as that's all it is... speech.
It's taking action when speech turns to action but before people get hurt that's the trick...
http:///forum/post/3258640
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Plain and simple.
As long as that's all it is... speech.
It's taking action when speech turns to action but before people get hurt that's the trick...
fishtaco
Active Member
Originally Posted by scottnlisa
http:///forum/post/3258640
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Plain and simple.
Do you really think the what these people where up to is what the founding fathers had in mind? Your really going to use the 1st to defend people who wanted to kill policemen? I hope not.
http:///forum/post/3258640
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Plain and simple.
Do you really think the what these people where up to is what the founding fathers had in mind? Your really going to use the 1st to defend people who wanted to kill policemen? I hope not.
scottnlisa
Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3258644
Do you really think the what these people where up to is what the founding fathers had in mind? Your really going to use the 1st to defend people who wanted to kill policemen? I hope not.
What about the right to bare arms in you brought it up. When this was enacted the only gun was the muskette. Kinda hard to hide a muskette under the clothes. That amendment really needs to be redone. Nobody should have guns. Plain and simple. Why do people need guns? Hunting???Use bow and arrow. If your a good hunter you'll be fine. Why else do you need guns? You don't
anyways FREEDOM of SPEECH. For every action has a reaction. The bombing on 9-11. Why did it happen, we (the USA) but our noses where it doesn't belong. We need to be knocked down some pegs and that did it.
http:///forum/post/3258644
Do you really think the what these people where up to is what the founding fathers had in mind? Your really going to use the 1st to defend people who wanted to kill policemen? I hope not.
What about the right to bare arms in you brought it up. When this was enacted the only gun was the muskette. Kinda hard to hide a muskette under the clothes. That amendment really needs to be redone. Nobody should have guns. Plain and simple. Why do people need guns? Hunting???Use bow and arrow. If your a good hunter you'll be fine. Why else do you need guns? You don't
anyways FREEDOM of SPEECH. For every action has a reaction. The bombing on 9-11. Why did it happen, we (the USA) but our noses where it doesn't belong. We need to be knocked down some pegs and that did it.
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by scottnlisa
http:///forum/post/3258647
What about the right to bare arms in you brought it up. When this was enacted the only gun was the muskette. Kinda hard to hide a muskette under the clothes. That amendment really needs to be redone. Nobody should have guns. Plain and simple. Why do people need guns? Hunting???Use bow and arrow. If your a good hunter you'll be fine. Why else do you need guns? You don't
anyways FREEDOM of SPEECH. For every action has a reaction. The bombing on 9-11. Why did it happen, we (the USA) but our noses where it doesn't belong. We need to be knocked down some pegs and that did it.
Ignorance is Bliss isn't it. actually there were cannons as well...guess what? Private citizens owned cannons as well....
Nice to think killing 3000 innocent civilians was just a knock down a few pegs in your eyes.
Your arguments don't mesh. I know you support a woman's right to abortion. Yet you don't support her right to defend herself. You are a piece of work.
http:///forum/post/3258647
What about the right to bare arms in you brought it up. When this was enacted the only gun was the muskette. Kinda hard to hide a muskette under the clothes. That amendment really needs to be redone. Nobody should have guns. Plain and simple. Why do people need guns? Hunting???Use bow and arrow. If your a good hunter you'll be fine. Why else do you need guns? You don't
anyways FREEDOM of SPEECH. For every action has a reaction. The bombing on 9-11. Why did it happen, we (the USA) but our noses where it doesn't belong. We need to be knocked down some pegs and that did it.
Ignorance is Bliss isn't it. actually there were cannons as well...guess what? Private citizens owned cannons as well....
Nice to think killing 3000 innocent civilians was just a knock down a few pegs in your eyes.
Your arguments don't mesh. I know you support a woman's right to abortion. Yet you don't support her right to defend herself. You are a piece of work.
scottnlisa
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3258652
Ignorance is Bliss isn't it. actually there were cannons as well...guess what? Private citizens owned cannons as well....
Nice to think killing 3000 innocent civilians was just a knock down a few pegs in your eyes.
Your arguments don't mesh. I know you support a woman's right to abortion. Yet you don't support her right to defend herself. You are a piece of work.
Actually yes I believe in a woman's right to abortion. There are other ways to defend herself. Anybody can by a stun gun or tazer. that will knock anybody down. So no need for guns. 9/11 happened to prove to the world that the USA isn't terrorist prove. We were attacked in that magitude before. if we would of kept our nose out of other countries business, mosty likely it wouldn't of happened. We (USA) are NOT I repeat NOT the world police. Plain and simple
http:///forum/post/3258652
Ignorance is Bliss isn't it. actually there were cannons as well...guess what? Private citizens owned cannons as well....
Nice to think killing 3000 innocent civilians was just a knock down a few pegs in your eyes.
Your arguments don't mesh. I know you support a woman's right to abortion. Yet you don't support her right to defend herself. You are a piece of work.
Actually yes I believe in a woman's right to abortion. There are other ways to defend herself. Anybody can by a stun gun or tazer. that will knock anybody down. So no need for guns. 9/11 happened to prove to the world that the USA isn't terrorist prove. We were attacked in that magitude before. if we would of kept our nose out of other countries business, mosty likely it wouldn't of happened. We (USA) are NOT I repeat NOT the world police. Plain and simple
darthtang aw
Active Member
At the time, all we had was newspaper and our own physical speech. Now we have cell phones, texting, internet. Freedom of speech was never meant to have all these outlets. so we should just remove it from the constitution.
At the time of the constitution we didn't have this big of a population. It was never knew that peaceable assemblies could be in the millions........so lets throw this out as well. That many people chanting and protesting could lead to riots and harm.
Also at the time of the constitution they had no possible idea how much the military would cost to maintain. Therefore in the interest of cutting costs we should have military soldiers quartered in any home we desire to save cost to us the taxpayer. After all, the had no idea how large of an army we would need to maintain.
At the time of the constitution the framers had no idea we would have so many outlets to spreqad sedition and so many ways to cover up criminal activity. Therefore lets do away with the need for warrant and justifiable cause from our government to search our homes and seize our property.
scottnlisa you are a piece of work........................
At the time of the constitution we didn't have this big of a population. It was never knew that peaceable assemblies could be in the millions........so lets throw this out as well. That many people chanting and protesting could lead to riots and harm.
Also at the time of the constitution they had no possible idea how much the military would cost to maintain. Therefore in the interest of cutting costs we should have military soldiers quartered in any home we desire to save cost to us the taxpayer. After all, the had no idea how large of an army we would need to maintain.
At the time of the constitution the framers had no idea we would have so many outlets to spreqad sedition and so many ways to cover up criminal activity. Therefore lets do away with the need for warrant and justifiable cause from our government to search our homes and seize our property.
scottnlisa you are a piece of work........................
scottnlisa
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3258665
At the time, all we had was newspaper and our own physical speech. Now we have cell phones, texting, internet. Freedom of speech was never meant to have all these outlets. so we should just remove it from the constitution.
At the time of the constitution we didn't have this big of a population. It was never knew that peaceable assemblies could be in the millions........so lets throw this out as well. That many people chanting and protesting could lead to riots and harm.
Also at the time of the constitution they had no possible idea how much the military would cost to maintain. Therefore in the interest of cutting costs we should have military soldiers quartered in any home we desire to save cost to us the taxpayer. After all, the had no idea how large of an army we would need to maintain.
At the time of the constitution the framers had no idea we would have so many outlets to spreqad sedition and so many ways to cover up criminal activity. Therefore lets do away with the need for warrant and justifiable cause from our government to search our homes and seize our property.
scottnlisa you are a piece of work........................
You actually come up with some good ideas. Like the military, if the country would mind it's own business and not worry about oil prices, we could shrink the military alot.
http:///forum/post/3258665
At the time, all we had was newspaper and our own physical speech. Now we have cell phones, texting, internet. Freedom of speech was never meant to have all these outlets. so we should just remove it from the constitution.
At the time of the constitution we didn't have this big of a population. It was never knew that peaceable assemblies could be in the millions........so lets throw this out as well. That many people chanting and protesting could lead to riots and harm.
Also at the time of the constitution they had no possible idea how much the military would cost to maintain. Therefore in the interest of cutting costs we should have military soldiers quartered in any home we desire to save cost to us the taxpayer. After all, the had no idea how large of an army we would need to maintain.
At the time of the constitution the framers had no idea we would have so many outlets to spreqad sedition and so many ways to cover up criminal activity. Therefore lets do away with the need for warrant and justifiable cause from our government to search our homes and seize our property.
scottnlisa you are a piece of work........................
You actually come up with some good ideas. Like the military, if the country would mind it's own business and not worry about oil prices, we could shrink the military alot.
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by scottnlisa
http:///forum/post/3258657
Actually yes I believe in a woman's right to abortion. There are other ways to defend herself. Anybody can by a stun gun or tazer. that will knock anybody down. So no need for guns. 9/11 happened to prove to the world that the USA isn't terrorist prove. We were attacked in that magitude before. if we would of kept our nose out of other countries business, mosty likely it wouldn't of happened. We (USA) are NOT I repeat NOT the world police. Plain and simple
Figures....
a stun gun or tazer is sufficient...interesting. You have no problem with stun guns, even though stun guns have killed as well. Here let me give you a liberal slanted story on this.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=701569n
Until you learn the tool is not the problem but the person operating it, you are lost. stun guns can be equally as dangerous.
There is a case of some guys killing a bum with a stun gun. Your stun gun argument doesn't fit.
So once again, you are against the right to defend yourself.
And you are ignorant of History. we kept our nose out of WW2 and we lost how many people in a suprise attack then?
what exactly were we doing to bring 9/11 on ourselves. This should be a hoot. Tell me....at the time of 9/11 where were we interfering and imposing our will?
http:///forum/post/3258657
Actually yes I believe in a woman's right to abortion. There are other ways to defend herself. Anybody can by a stun gun or tazer. that will knock anybody down. So no need for guns. 9/11 happened to prove to the world that the USA isn't terrorist prove. We were attacked in that magitude before. if we would of kept our nose out of other countries business, mosty likely it wouldn't of happened. We (USA) are NOT I repeat NOT the world police. Plain and simple
Figures....
a stun gun or tazer is sufficient...interesting. You have no problem with stun guns, even though stun guns have killed as well. Here let me give you a liberal slanted story on this.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=701569n
Until you learn the tool is not the problem but the person operating it, you are lost. stun guns can be equally as dangerous.
There is a case of some guys killing a bum with a stun gun. Your stun gun argument doesn't fit.
So once again, you are against the right to defend yourself.
And you are ignorant of History. we kept our nose out of WW2 and we lost how many people in a suprise attack then?
what exactly were we doing to bring 9/11 on ourselves. This should be a hoot. Tell me....at the time of 9/11 where were we interfering and imposing our will?
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by scottnlisa
http:///forum/post/3258667
You actually come up with some good ideas. Like the military, if the country would mind it's own business and not worry about oil prices, we could shrink the military alot.
explain this in detail....considering our military consist of 2% of our population....the same as most other countries....The only place you can shrink the military is in technology....but I guess having better tech has nothing to do with our better survival rate per conflict as the years have gone on............
http:///forum/post/3258667
You actually come up with some good ideas. Like the military, if the country would mind it's own business and not worry about oil prices, we could shrink the military alot.
explain this in detail....considering our military consist of 2% of our population....the same as most other countries....The only place you can shrink the military is in technology....but I guess having better tech has nothing to do with our better survival rate per conflict as the years have gone on............
fishtaco
Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3258673
explain this in detail....considering our military consist of 2% of our population....the same as most other countries....The only place you can shrink the military is in technology....but I guess having better tech has nothing to do with our better survival rate per conflict as the years have gone on............
Maybe we should just let people like the Hutaree militia defend the country.....
Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3258673
explain this in detail....considering our military consist of 2% of our population....the same as most other countries....The only place you can shrink the military is in technology....but I guess having better tech has nothing to do with our better survival rate per conflict as the years have gone on............
Maybe we should just let people like the Hutaree militia defend the country.....
Fishtaco
scottnlisa
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3258672
Figures....
a stun gun or tazer is sufficient...interesting. You have no problem with stun guns, even though stun guns have killed as well. Here let me give you a liberal slanted story on this.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=701569n
Until you learn the tool is not the problem but the person operating it, you are lost. stun guns can be equally as dangerous.
There is a case of some guys killing a bum with a stun gun. Your stun gun argument doesn't fit.
So once again, you are against the right to defend yourself.
And you are ignorant of History. we kept our nose out of WW2 and we lost how many people in a suprise attack then?
what exactly were we doing to bring 9/11 on ourselves. This should be a hoot. Tell me....at the time of 9/11 where were we interfering and imposing our will?
On reason we got attacked on 9/11 was because little dummy Bush was hunting down Bin laden. The reason he was doing that was because Bin Laden put a hit out on bigger dummy Bush but failed and bush failwed to take Bin Laden out. So yeah check your history yourself before you start saying something. Plain and simple for every action there is a equal and opposite reaction. We deserved what happen to us.
http:///forum/post/3258672
Figures....
a stun gun or tazer is sufficient...interesting. You have no problem with stun guns, even though stun guns have killed as well. Here let me give you a liberal slanted story on this.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=701569n
Until you learn the tool is not the problem but the person operating it, you are lost. stun guns can be equally as dangerous.
There is a case of some guys killing a bum with a stun gun. Your stun gun argument doesn't fit.
So once again, you are against the right to defend yourself.
And you are ignorant of History. we kept our nose out of WW2 and we lost how many people in a suprise attack then?
what exactly were we doing to bring 9/11 on ourselves. This should be a hoot. Tell me....at the time of 9/11 where were we interfering and imposing our will?
On reason we got attacked on 9/11 was because little dummy Bush was hunting down Bin laden. The reason he was doing that was because Bin Laden put a hit out on bigger dummy Bush but failed and bush failwed to take Bin Laden out. So yeah check your history yourself before you start saying something. Plain and simple for every action there is a equal and opposite reaction. We deserved what happen to us.
aquaknight
Active Member
Originally Posted by scottnlisa
http:///forum/post/3258677
We deserved what happen to us.
Holy christ dude...
http:///forum/post/3258677
We deserved what happen to us.
Holy christ dude...
scottnlisa
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3258673
explain this in detail....considering our military consist of 2% of our population....the same as most other countries....The only place you can shrink the military is in technology....but I guess having better tech has nothing to do with our better survival rate per conflict as the years have gone on............
More money is spent on the military then education? See a problem with that?
http:///forum/post/3258673
explain this in detail....considering our military consist of 2% of our population....the same as most other countries....The only place you can shrink the military is in technology....but I guess having better tech has nothing to do with our better survival rate per conflict as the years have gone on............
More money is spent on the military then education? See a problem with that?
scottnlisa
Member
Originally Posted by AquaKnight
http:///forum/post/3258680
Holy christ dude...
your right i phrased that wrong. We got what we had coming to us. You can only act like the big kid on the block before somebody smaller comes and knocks you off the block. It put the USA in check. Wow, we aren't the most powerful. Wait Wait, them attacking us on our soil isn't in the rule book. Hmmmm, maybe time to pull everybody home and rethink everything.
http:///forum/post/3258680
Holy christ dude...
your right i phrased that wrong. We got what we had coming to us. You can only act like the big kid on the block before somebody smaller comes and knocks you off the block. It put the USA in check. Wow, we aren't the most powerful. Wait Wait, them attacking us on our soil isn't in the rule book. Hmmmm, maybe time to pull everybody home and rethink everything.