t316- mancard violation

stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
you are in violation of your mancard for having a "cute" puppy in your avitar.

for pentance you need to change your avitar to this.

or
 
darthtang aw

darthtang aw

Active Member
stdreb27, you are in violation for calling out a fellow man and incorrectly spelling the violation. It is "avatar". Your penance, to replace your avatar with said "cute" puppy and endure one Barbara Streisand CD at length.
 
t316

t316

Active Member

I thought it was at least a step up from the Rudolph av....

At least it's a dog....
 
camfish

camfish

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2880689
stdreb27, you are in violation for calling out a fellow man and incorrectly spelling the violation. It is "avatar". Your penance, to replace your avatar with said "cute" puppy and endure one Barbara Streisand CD at length.
Haha. There definitely isn't a worse punishment than that.
 
darthtang aw

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by AquaKnight
http:///forum/post/2880696
T316's avatar could have worked. He just needed a dog with a much more killer instinct:

Dressing up a dog in clothes is very metro, hence a violation in and of itself. The only exceptions to this rule are sports jersey on any dog is allowable. There are a couple exceptions to this clause however. Tennis and golf jerseys do not count. Soccer is still up for debate.
 
robertmathern

robertmathern

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2880689
stdreb27, you are in violation for calling out a fellow man and incorrectly spelling the violation. It is "avatar". Your penance, to replace your avatar with said "cute" puppy and endure one Barbara Streisand CD at length.
+1 I agree he must have ''cute puppy'' tell the new year. He is also in violation for even hinting T316 replace it with half nak ed men. I also think T316 is in violation and must change the avatar or stand trial. But I dont think he needs to have a half nak ed man as an avatar.
 
camfish

camfish

Active Member
Originally Posted by robertmathern
http:///forum/post/2880715
+1 I agree he must have ''cute puppy'' tell the new year. He is also in violation for even hinting T316 replace it with half nak ed men. I also think T316 is in violation and must change the avatar or stand trial. But I dont think he needs to have a half nak ed man as an avatar.

I agree. What's up with that stdreb?
 
stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by robertmathern
http:///forum/post/2880715
+1 I agree he must have ''cute puppy'' tell the new year. He is also in violation for even hinting T316 replace it with half nak ed men. I also think T316 is in violation and must change the avatar or stand trial. But I dont think he needs to have a half nak ed man as an avatar.
What you have a problem with bruce lee?

There is nothing wrong with a picture of THE man preparing for or in battle. Now if I had recomended this.

It would be a different story.
 
darthtang aw

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2880725
What you have a problem with bruce lee?

There is nothing wrong with a picture of THE man preparing for or in battle. Now if I had recomended this.

It would be a different story.

CHARGES DROPPED!
 
camfish

camfish

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2880725
What you have a problem with bruce lee?

There is nothing wrong with a picture of THE man preparing for or in battle. Now if I had recomended this.

It would be a different story.
The fact that you put this picture here confirms it...
I would put the dancing banana after that sentence, but I'm afraid it would make you...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top