salty blues
Active Member
The U.N. bans a list of bad stuff:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090510...onmentchemical
Oops, they forgot to add this:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090511/...as_afghanistan
Not trying to make light of any of this as this is obviously important stuff. My point is, in the first article who will enforce any of this? It surely won't be the U.N. as they are an impotent body.
In the second article, once again the USA is the bad guy, but more to the point, this is war folks, and as such, people get hurt, and people die. As to the U.N., they should ban themselves.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090510...onmentchemical
Oops, they forgot to add this:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090511/...as_afghanistan
Not trying to make light of any of this as this is obviously important stuff. My point is, in the first article who will enforce any of this? It surely won't be the U.N. as they are an impotent body.
In the second article, once again the USA is the bad guy, but more to the point, this is war folks, and as such, people get hurt, and people die. As to the U.N., they should ban themselves.
