Where can I find some solid reading on lighting?

jsb

Member
I'm trying to come up with which lighting I want to go with on my new tank. Everyone I talk to has a different answer to the life span of a bulb. I'm trying to be wise with my spending, and I want a setup that isn't going to cost a small fortune. I run PCs now on my current tank, and I replace bulbs around every 9 months, because that's what I was told. Some have said 6 months, and others 12 months. I was going to use VHOs on my new tank, but I priced a retrofit kit, and I thought it was high. So I thought maybe I should go Metal Halide. I come to the same question how much will bulbs cost me through the years, and is it more cost effective to go one way or the other. My ideal lighting would be 2 250w MHs, and 2 VHO antics. The guy at the LFS told me if I go with more than 4 VHOs including my antics, then I should go MHs. What's your opinion, and or where can I find some accurate reading.
Oh I almost forgot. Some one mentioned I use NOs, and over drive them...Thoughts?
Thanks,
Jeremy
 

scsinet

Active Member
Methinks I can help you.. been where you are..
Okay, starting off, the life of bulbs totally varies. It varies based on how efficient your ballast is, how long you run your tubes, and how light-needy your livestock is.
If you are running VHO over a reef stocked with Anemones, Corals, etc, then you should replace your VHOs every 6-9 months. Many people lean towards fluorescent options because they "can't afford halide."
In the long run, halide is usually cheaper if set up carefully. Halides have a very high startup cost, and the bulbs are really expensive. However, you only have to replace halides every 12 months or so. My LFS runs theirs for 18 months, but livestock is never in their tanks for long, so I wouldn't recommend it. If you use big halides and run the right color temp (10,000K-20,000K), you don't need supplemental fluorescent for the animals. You might want them for you, but since your animals arent' dependant on them, you can replace them whenever you want and run as cheap of bulbs as you want (provided they don't cause algae blooms
).
To name an example, I was running (4) 110 watt VHO bulbs (2 10K, 2 20K) over my 55 reef. The bulbs are about 23 bucks each (plus shipping), replacing every 6 months. That comes out to 184 dollars per year in bulbs. I recently switched to halide, and am now running (2) 14,000K 175 watt halides over the same tank. My tank is overall doing much better, the lighting is much more attractive, and I my two bulbs are 80 bucks each. That comes out to 160 bucks a year in lighting. The other advantage is the all my VHOs were on one ballast, so if that ballast failed, I was screwed on lighting unitl I got it fixed. With two halides, I still have enough lighting to keep things alive if one ballast fails or one bulb goes out.
As for overdriving, the Icecap 440 and 660 will run NO bulbs at a much higher wattage than they are designed for. I use a 660 on my tank at work, a freshwater planted, which has 3 Sylvania daylight Home Depot Specials in it and one actinic VHO. All bulbs *look* the same brightness, and I have noticed no reduction in lamp life doing it this way. In a reef environment, however, you need to run "good for reef" bulbs. A NO Actinic bulb is only a few bucks less than a VHO, so you might as well go VHO.
Hate to say it, but lighting is THE most expensive part of a reef, and THE most important.
Good reading? Sure... The Conciencious Marine Aquarist by Bob Fenner has a whole chapter on lighting. I think his information is a little outdated though because he refers to halides as a sort of "new trend."
 

jsb

Member
Good info. Thanks!
I often hear people say you can get bulbs much cheaper than advertised. Is this a myth? One of those turned out to be 6500 MHs bulbs for like $59, but I'd have to run antics with those wouldn't I? Your advising me to use the 10000 or 20000 lights to avoid having to run additional antics right? I think I need to pony up and run MHs. I thought PCs would be cheaper. Setup was cheaper but these bulbs are getting annoying.
Did you build you kit, or did you buy a retro. I was thinking of tracking down components and make my own system to save a little. Is that worth the trouble?
 

scsinet

Active Member
I completely build my own systems from scratch, even the ballast chassis. One of these days I will post pictures of that on my website, but I keep forgetting.
Corals like light in the high kelvin range... 20K is about the best, but it looks too blue for people so usually they supplement with a lower K.. maybe say 6500 or so. On the other hand, some people run low K halides, like the 6500's you mentioned, and supplement with high value PC or VHOs, like 20K.
Personally, I use 14,000K halides. This strikes a nice balance, and as long as you are willing to run larger bulbs than minimum, it provides more than enough good coral growing light.
Do NOT buy cheap bulbs. Too many people make that mistake. Get good high quality lamps. I use Hamilton myself, but if you run an HQI ballast, you can save a few dollars a bulb and get Ushio (they are cheaper becuase they need HQI to run, not as versatile).
Cheap bulbs drift color, flicker, resonate, fail restrike, die early, are super burning position sensitive, etc. It's not worth it.
 
Top