Where can I put my Mandarin?

keeshcarm

Member
New here..Wow, wonderful site for info! I spend hours on here just reading and learning.
I have removed all the fish from my DT to put them in hypo. I'm going to let it sit for a couple months. It is full of corals ect.. I just can't get a mild ick problem to go away for good. I had the tank empty a few months ago because of ick also, but somehow brought it back in...
Anyway, a few days ago someone stated in a post to not put a mandarin in hypo...so what do I do with him? I have several other tanks he could go in but none with food, just bare-bottom QT tanks. Is there anything else he will eat for 2 months? He has a couple spots on him..Can he handle copper?
thanks for any advice..
 

meowzer

Moderator
Welcome to SWF..I can't answer your question, I just wanted to welcome you here

I am sure someone will get back to you with a good answer
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
Feed everyone garlic. In my experience, it works. Studies show that it masks the smell of the fish and confuses the ich into thinking that there are no fish in the tank. All the ich dies. I fed a hippo tang (ich magnets by the way) garlic for 3 months and never saw a sign of ich after that.
 

aquaknight

Active Member

Originally Posted by YearOfTheNick
http:///forum/post/3050109
Feed everyone garlic. In my experience, it works. Studies show that it masks the smell of the fish and confuses the ich into thinking that there are no fish in the tank. All the ich dies. I fed a hippo tang (ich magnets by the way) garlic for 3 months and never saw a sign of ich after that.

Dear g-us, maybe since it's 4am, but that post was awesome. Something that works equally as well, stand on your head when you top off with water. The Ich will be so confused by what you're doing, they will totally forget that there's fish in the tank.
In all seriousness, I'd love to see those 'reports' explanation of how they drew together the concept that protozoans have an olfactory system...
keeschcarm
, mandarins, i.e. all scaleless fish, are fine in hyposalinity. It's copper treatments that commonly irritate them. Try to provide a mixed diet of mysis, enriched brine, cyclopeeze, daphnia, etc. One tip is to provide a 'diner' for the mandarin. Search for "mandarin diner" on google and should be the first link.
 

keeshcarm

Member
Thanks Meowzer, I always enjoy your posts.
Yes I do feed garlic, I soak the mysis,brine ect.. in it before feeding. Also the dry food I feed has garlic.

I am much more comfortable using hypo or copper though. I don't want to take that chance. I have lost fish before when I originally "caught" ich from a fish bought at a local fish store. I get very upset when I lose a captured, yanked from his home animal because of my own ignorance.
Thank you for your post. I was not aware that mandarins could survive without their pods. Must have been my other LFS (the good one) that cleverly advised me to wait numerous months to add a mandarin so he would not starve. I am thankful for their thoughtful advise.
I have
72 gal
55 gal
35 gal
and 4 20's and 29's for QT and isolation if needed
 

spanko

Active Member
Yup, the anti parasite claims for garlic are at best unsubstantiated by any real scientific data, YET! However it does seem to serve as an appetite stimulator and this in itself will help to entice the fish to eat which is always a good thing in these circumstances. The advise from you LFS to wait numerous months to add a mandarin was in fact good advice. The goal was to allow your tank to mature and for a large pod population to grow.
From my reading hypo seems to be the best option for treating the ich in fish, and running the display tank fallow (fishless) for at least 6 weeks seems to be the treatment to clear the tank.
 

keeshcarm

Member
Now if I can catch the mandarin! I have everyone else out of the DT.
FYI, I did use a whole big bottle of Kick-Ich to no avail. 15 or more days in fact. My yellow tang still had several spots (fresh dipped her several times throughout the Kick-ich treatment).
My black & white clowns seem to be immune, the coral beauty angel only gets 1 or 2, wrasse only 1 or 2 but that darn tang hogs them all.
Also have UV in for only couple weeks.
 

yearofthenick

Active Member

Originally Posted by AquaKnight
http:///forum/post/3050133

Dear g-us, maybe since it's 4am, but that post was awesome. Something that works equally as well, stand on your head when you top off with water. The Ich will be so confused by what you're doing, they will totally forget that there's fish in the tank.
In all seriousness, I'd love to see those 'reports' explanation of how they drew together the concept that protozoans have an olfactory system...
keeschcarm
, mandarins, i.e. all scaleless fish, are fine in hyposalinity. It's copper treatments that commonly irritate them. Try to provide a mixed diet of mysis, enriched brine, cyclopeeze, daphnia, etc. One tip is to provide a 'diner' for the mandarin. Search for "mandarin diner" on google and should be the first link.
Look dude. In my experience it works. I'll stand by that.
Here's the article. I woud post the original link but it sends you to another saltwater forum and I know it violates the rules on here....
Garlic versus 'Marine Ich': Diallyl thiosulfinate activity against Cryptocaryon irritans infestations of marine fish
By Horge Cortes-Jorge Jr. Sunday the 31st of December 2000 (modified for Saturday the 3rd of February, 2001).
I. The Pungent Rosebud
Garlic has received a noticeable amount of attention in the Westernized portion of the marine-aquarium hobby the past three years, though in truth garlic has been incorporated in tonics and feed for domesticated fish for decades in Asia (pers.obs., author). The hobby is now fairly garnished with anecdotal relations of experiences with the efficacy or futility of garlic treatments. Garlic treatment has been attempted against diverse infections and infestations of marine fish, notably cryptocaryosis , widely known by the common epithet "Marine Ich", and authored by the parasitic ciliate protozoan Cryptocaryon irritans .
It is naturally difficult to gauge the overall value of garlic therapy for diseased fish, given that the diseases treated vary as widely as the dosage and the delivery vehicle. Nevertheless, a quick review of hobbyist claims on internet discussion boards reveals a mostly-favorable assessment by those who’ve used it to treat parasitic infestations, particularly cryptocaryosis, on which much of the proceeding discussion centers.
A thorough description of the life cycle of C. irritans is beyond the scope of this article, and indeed might generate some contention on its own. Suffice to say that a free swimming form, or tomite, locates a host fish, and proceeds to attach to and anchor/burrow into the host as a trophont. In time the fattened trophont forms a 'cyst', called a tomont, in which many young tomites begin development, this tomont may 'hatch' either on the fish, or detach to fall to the substrate and there release the little tomites./>
I hope here to help point towards clues to why garlic might work, in particular against cryptocaryosis. Also why, under certain circumstances, it might not.
II. Clove Med?
Allicin, a.k.a. Diallyl thiosulfinate (or Diallyl disulphide-oxide), has been identified as the chief active pharmaceutical ingredient in garlic ( Allium sativum ). Allicin is a broad-spectrum agent against both Gram+ and Gram- bacteria (Cavallito, 1944; Adetumbi & Lau, 1983; Ankri & Mirelman, 1999) with a scope of applicability about as wide as penicillin's, though allicin is less potent.
Allicin also works against at least some viruses (Weber et.al., 1992), and some pathogenic protozoans (Lun et.al., 1994; Ankri et.al., 1997). Lastly, some of its rapid-breakdown products, ajoene in particular, possess considerable anti-fungal properties (Yoshida et.al.,1987). Of course, garlic also yields other active compounds, and they too have some pharmaceutical value, but are said to be decidedly less potent than the chief active ingredient.
Allicin is naturally produced when garlic is damaged or crushed, allowing the release and inter-reaction of two substances, the non-protein amino acid alliin and the enzyme alliinase (Krest & Keusgen, 1999). In that sense, allicin is an all-around defense from the garlic plant, manufactured fresh, right where trauma to the plant occurs and where the threat of invasion or infection is imminent. Not surprisingly, it reportedly has insect repellent properties as well.
Allicin further has a remarkable ability to permeate living tissue (Miron et.al., 2000). That is why it is hard to get garlic's smell off your skin after contact with the raw material --it really digs in, penetrating tissue with comparative ease, and this has implications on its potency.
Hobbyist attention presently seems to center on garlic’s value as therapy versus infestations of C. irritans , and so I shall get right to such a scenario, focusing on allicin as the active ingredient.
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
III. Allicin Wonderland
In a parasitic protozoan infestation similar to Marine Ich, there are usually two major insults to the host fish's physiology:
the gross tissue damage committed by the protozoans themselves;
and the secondary infections that crash the party.
The applicability of such a broad-spectrum antiseptic as contained in garlic towards fending off secondary infections should be obvious, so I will set aside secondary infections at this point. Allicin has been observed to suppress the efficacy of cysteine proteinase and alcohol dehydrogenase, two tissue-demolition agents produced by another protozoan parasite, Entamoeba histolytica , (Ankri et.al., 1997), and one can easily extrapolate how garlic medication might limit the invasive and predatory damage caused directly by C. irritans .
Still, what generates as much (if not more) speculation is not the ability of garlic to restrict damage, but rather garlic's apparent ability to deliver damage to the parasites themselves -with numerous claims of outright detachment of C. irritans trophonts (the burrowing protozoans) and tomonts (the "egg cysts") as a result.
The aforementioned ability of allicin to permeate tissue and mucus enables it to invest an afflicted area thoroughly with its partially sulfurous chemical signature. The potential is there to mask the chemical cues that enable a parasite's recognition of the host, potentially confusing the invader and further suppressing the havoc it wreaks. (Indeed this would help uninfested fish dodge "Marine Ich").
Definitely, allicin brings outright chemical assault to the parasite. In one test, allicin’s cytotoxicity fell heavily against the parasitic protozoans Trypanosoma spp. and Giardia lamblia in concentrations that were well within the tolerance of 'host-tissue' fibroblasts (Lun et.al., 1994). The same penetrating power that ensures thorough investiture of the contested tissue with protective and camouflaging agents can also ensure thorough delivery of allicin's antagonism to --indeed, into-- invading parasites.
Lastly (though certainly, other properties may yet be discovered), allicin is said to reinforce the cues for cellular apoptosis, the mechanism of programmed cell-death (Thatte et.al., 2000). An innate mechanism such as apoptosis, guided with care, has the potential to severely limit the spread of say, cancer, by motivating cancerous cells to quickly self-terminate before they can multiply. If such a 'scorched earth' defense can be triggered by an infestation episode and be guided/reinforced by allicin, then yet another way may be revealed how garlic hinders both the ability of parasites to feed on host tissue and any opportunity for secondary infections to spread.
So roughly, garlic therapy can potentially
fend off secondary infection;
neutralize the chemicals used by the parasite to destroy host tissue;
mask host tissue, making it difficult for the parasite to recognize it;
deliver outright damage to the parasite.
If this all sounds too good to be true, there are assuredly wrinkles to the fabric woven thus far.
IV. Barricades
There are, admittedly, problems to allicin use.
Allicin is described as an unstable and highly reactive substance. Granted, some of its more stable breakdown products and siblings are not without pharmaceutical properties, but they are apparently of a lesser order of significance in garlic's overall value.
If the chief active ingredient is unstable and highly reactive, then commercial garlic-based products, by virtue of the various preparation processes they undergo, have less ability to yield allicin. To wit, judicious re-hydration of some dried garlic products can reinitiate the alliin-plus-alliinase synthesis of allicin, but much of those two reactive components will have already been expended in the course of industrial processing. Anyway, whether using processed or fresh garlic, the clock is running from the moment garlic is crushed to the moment its active ingredients are finally delivered to the host's afflicted parts, and there is no shortage of neutralizing substances barring the way.
It is at this point useful to take a step back and consider how garlic in any form is presently being used in marine aquaristics: either it is fed to the fish, or added straight to the water.
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
There are two big problems with feeding garlic to fish. First is the way that an acidic (pH 3 or lower) environment in the gastric cavity can irreversibly neutralize alliinase (Lawson & Hughes, 1992). Without that enzyme, no allicin can be formed in the stomach no matter how much alliin might be ingested. Certainly, better information on the chemistry of gastric juices in fish would be useful.
Second, presuming some allicin does form, and it travels out from the gut into the bloodstream, allicin’s sheer reactiveness would seem to prevent it from getting past the vigilance of the liver, let alone past hostile interaction with blood itself, which results first in reduction of hemoglobin to methemoglobin, the latter incapable of oxygen transport to cells and organs --and second in neutralization of the allicin (Freeman et.al.,1995). In one experiment, substantial damage to a rat’s liver cells was sustained at the concentrations of allicin required for some of it to get past (Egen-Schwind et.al., 1992). A better understanding of fish blood and fish liver reactivity (as opposed to those of humans and the more common lab animals) towards allicin would be very useful, but the available data nevertheless initially suggests that orally is not the way to administer allicin.
Indeed, much literature points towards topical application as being effective, and oral administration as futile. So why do we have numerous relations of success from hobbyists, after oral administration of garlic?
Here is a possible 'out'... or two:
Mastication by a fish cannot be so thorough as to deliver a fine garlic puree to the stomach (otherwise, many gut surveys in the field would be pointless), and thus stomach acids cannot thoroughly neutralize all enzyme before some allicin is synthesized. Garlic is at that point effective against at least gastrointestinal parasites and infections.
Let us assume that some allicin in the belly of the beast might then somehow proceed outward, and this is usually imagined as being through the blood vessels lining the gastrointestinal wall. The reactive, neutralizing embrace of both blood and liver has already been mentioned, but there are perhaps two ways to defeat those barriers and explain the 'success stories'.
First, the quantity of garlic fed might be massive enough to produce sufficient allicin to overwhelm the blood-and-liver barricade. Liver and hemoglobin damage be damned, some allicin thus reaches the infested tissue.
Second, and more elegantly, a backdoor of sorts is made obvious by recognizing that allicin formation begins even before digestion of garlic (indeed it should start even before acquisition and mastication). Already-formed allicin can rapidly permeate through tissue outward from the mouth and pharynx as it travels to the stomach, or even along the dermal mucus of the fish from the mouth outward. By traversing tissue and mucus on its own rather than relying on the circulatory system to travel, allicin may avoid more massive, neutralizing exposure to liver or blood. Even from the gut, allicin has some opportunity to travel though tissue rather than blood vessels exclusively. It thus might reach afflicted tissue without concentrated damage to host blood and liver, nor depletion of itself arising from such damage. Obviously, the less tissue there is to traverse, the better, and relatively small-bodied creatures like most marine ornamental fish have it pretty good in this regard.
Ingested allicin bypassing or overwhelming the hemoglobin barricade, is thus at least theoretically possible (setting aside any resulting damage to the host).
**An important point is that it is not only allicin that is in play . While allicin's chemical siblings, born of the same garlic, may be less potent, they are more stable: I am confining this discussion to allicin, but it is not the only active ingredient in garlic. So, even if allicin formation is restricted to the gastric cavity, and even if its transport is restricted to blood vessels, --and yes, even if no allicin gets past the liver... its breakdown products may still remain drifting in the bloodstream, and by themselves may effect (at bare minimum) the camouflaging of host tissue described earlier.**
Now, if oral administration can somehow be effective, how about administration by broadcast of garlic extract to the water? It certainly at first blush seems more akin to the "correct" method of delivery: topical application.
But, there is the obvious problem of dilution, and the thick biological soup that passes for tank water waiting to once again, neutralize any allicin. Schematically, this is much the same barricade that hemoglobin presented to ingested allicin in the preceding paragraphs. You can again either overwhelm this barrier via massive dosage, with the risk of impact this time on susceptible in-tank microorganisms across the board, or you bypass contact with the water.
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
It has been suggested that oily-vehicle garlic preparations may better preserve any active ingredients against dilution AND water-borne neutralizing agencies, long enough for the vehicle and payload to come in random contact with more receptive, afflicted tissue. However, the trouble with oily vehicles is specific gravity: the payload in such vehicles remains bobbing on the surface of the water, reducing the probability of delivery to the afflicted fish. It is here worth noting that oil-macerated garlic was found to yield a lesser amount of total thiosulfinate, and scant allicin, compared to ordinarily-crushed garlic (Yoshida et.a.l,1999). It is also worth repeating that those other thiosulfinates produced in oil maceration are less potent than their big brother allicin. In the aquatic context: rather than protecting garlic's potency, oil tends to incarcerate it.
On the merits of the above scenarios, it would seem that oral administration has a better chance of delivering the payload to the target. Both oral administration and direct broadcast into the water run the risk of an overdose producing significant collateral damage, but oral administration tends to limit any such 'friendly fire' to the fish being treated, rather than potentially affecting the biology of the whole aquarium.
There may be an impulse to seize upon Lun et.al. (1994) and wring out of their data a correct dosage of garlic. The 1994 study obtained the effective concentrations of allicin needed to reduce a parasitic protozoan metabolism by 50&#37; (a figure they called "IC50"). The figures yielded were <5.5micrograms/ml for diverse Trypanosoma spp. , 14micrograms/ml for Giardia lamblia, and 59 micrograms/ml for Entamoeba histolytica . The IC50 for the host fibroblasts from Homo sapiens and from Mastomys natalensis (an Arfican rat) was at about 25 micrograms/ml.
These values are derived from in vitro conditions, and involve rather exotic host species (from a reef aquarist's point of view), and so they are of limited value in bringing us any closer to a marine-aquarium standard prescription formula like "X grams of garlic medication per Y mg of host, over Z days".
Such a practical result (defining correct dosage) was never our objective here; rather, it was to examine the possible pathways towards the claimed efficacy of garlic treatments against cryptocaryosis and possibly other protozoan infestations of aquarium fish. I arbitrarily focused mostly on just one of garlic's children, allicin, based on the prominence assigned it in cited references spanning half a century.
V. Capitulation
We know that the chief active ingredient in garlic is allicin, and we know many of the pathogens that it (and its derivatives/siblings) can be effective against, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites.
Focusing on cases of cryptocaryosis, I have noted how allicin can fend off secondary infection and restrain certain chemicals that parasitic protozoans use to damage host tissue. I have noted how easily allicin permeates living tissue, and have suggested how allicin might render host tissue unrecognizable to parasites, in essence camouflaging it. Furthermore, I have noted how allicin directly attacks protozoan parasites.
Examination has been made of some limitations and complications attending the use of allicin, beginning with its instability and potential to harm the patient's circulatory system. I have described some of the many barriers both within the patient's body and without, and considerable verbiage was expended (and the author thanks the readers for their endurance) in the course of exploring how such barriers might theoretically be overcome.
Lastly, the assessment has been made, that while research focused on terrestrial models suggests that topical application of allicin is best, an aquatic model bearing inherent risk of immediate dilution/neutralization seems to shift favor to oral administration of garlic pharmaceuticals to afflicted fish. This is both from the point of view of efficiency and with an interest in limiting collateral damage.
It is certainly my prayer that the foregoing has at least opened up some aspects of garlic therapy for further inquiry, and to aid in the ongoing hobbyist discussions of garlic. But I would be the first to point out that the foregoing, like many similar discussions, is hampered by the present lack of hard information specifically grounded in marine aquaristics. The past few years have seen an increase in scientific investigation into garlic’s pharmaceutical potential and properties, with the accumulation of earlier research having attained sufficient mass to support further, more detailed inquiry and experimentation. Not surprisingly, commercial interests, and the incentives they offer supporting such scientific undertakings, incline most of the research towards applicability in the profitable pursuit of addressing human health issues.
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
Marine-context applications of garlic-based pharmaceuticals are naturally not the center of focus for much research. I have attempted to take general principles from more terrestrially-centered research and have then attempted to apply them to such a marine context as is relevant to aquaristics.
Ironically, there is left at least one sizeable source of information on garlic treatments specifically grounded in the context of marine aquaristics: those very stories, those anecdotal relations of experiences with garlic, that beggared explanation and motivated this discussion in the first place. In their present forms, such anecdotes avoid utility as data . What is keenly missed is a heightened ability to intelligently and systematically observe, describe, record, and share such experiences among all marine aquarists. Otherwise all this potential data, from so many informal and individual trials of garlic and its derivatives, goes largely to waste.
Hopefully, this discussion, even if partially, avoids such a fate.
VI. References and Further Reading
Adetumbi MA, Lau BH. Allium sativum (garlic)--a natural antibiotic . Med Hypotheses 1983 Nov;12(3):227-37
Agarwal KC. Therapeutic actions of garlic constituents . Med Res Rev 1996 Jan;16(1):111-24
Ankri S, Mirelman D. Antimicrobial properties of allicin from garlic . Microbes Infect 1999 Feb;1(2):125-129
Ankri S, Miron T, Rabinkov A, Wilchek M, Mirelman D. Allicin from garlic strongly inhibits cysteine proteinases and cytopathic effects of Entamoeba histolytica . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997 Oct;41(10):2286-8
Cavallito, C. J. and Bailey, J. H. (1944). Allicin, the antibacterial principle of Allium sativum. I. Isolation, physical properties and antimicrobial action , J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 66, 1950-1951.
Cavallito, C. J., Buck, J. S. and Suter, C. M. (1944). Allicin, the antibacterial principles of Allium sativim. II. Determination of the chemical structure , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 66, 1952-1954.
Egen-Schwind C., Eckard R. and Kemper F.H. Metabolism of Garlic Constituents in the Isolated Perfused Rat Liver . Planta Medica, 58: 301-305, 1992
Feldberg RS, Chang SC, Kotik AN, Nadler M, Neuwirth Z, Sundstrom DC, Thompson NH. In vitro mechanism of inhibition of bacterial cell growth by allicin . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988 Dec;32(12):1763-8
Freeman F. and Kodera Y. Garlic Chemistry: Stability of S-(2-propenyl)-2-propene-1-sulfinothioate(Allicin) in Blood, Solvents, and Simulated Physiological Fluids . Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 43: 2332-2338,1995
Krest I, Keusgen M. Stabilization and pharmaceutical use of alliinase . Pharmazie 1999 Apr;54(4):289-93
Krest I, Keusgen M. Quality of herbal remedies from Allium sativum: differences between alliinase from garlic powder and fresh garlic . Planta Medica 1999 Mar;65(2):139-43
Lawson L.D. and Hughes B.G. Characterization of the Formation of Allicin and other Thiosulfinates from Garlic . Planta Medica, 58: 345-350, 1992
Lun ZR, Burri C, Menzinger M, Kaminsky R. Antiparasitic activity of diallyl trisulfide (Dasuansu) on human and animal pathogenic protozoa (Trypanosoma sp., Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia) in vitro . Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 1994 Mar;74(1):51-9
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
Mayeux PR, Agrawal KC, Tou JS, King BT, Lippton HL, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ, McNamara DB. The pharmacological effects of allicin, a constituent of garlic oil . Agents Actions 1988 Aug;25(1-2):182-90
Miron T, Rabinkov A, Mirelman D, Wilchek M, Weiner L The mode of action of allicin: its ready permeability through phospholipid membranes may contribute to its biological activity . Biochim Biophys Acta 2000 Jan 15;1463(1):20-30
Rabinkov A, Wilchek M, Mirelman D. Alliinase (alliin lyase) from garlic (Allium sativum) is glycosylated at ASN146 and forms a complex with a garlic mannose-specific lectin . Glycoconj J 1995 Oct;12(5):690-8
Rabinkov A, Miron T, Konstantinovski L, Wilchek M, Mirelman D, Weiner L. The mode of action of allicin: trapping of radicals and interaction with thiol containing proteins . Biochim Biophys Acta 1998 Feb 2;1379(2):233-44
Scharfenberg K, Wagner R, Wagner KG The cytotoxic effect of ajoene, a natural product from garlic, investigated with different cell lines . Cancer Lett 1990 Sep;53(2-3):103-8
Stoll, A. and Seebeck, E. (1951). Chemical investigation of alliin, the specific principle of garlic , Adv. Enzymol., 11, 377-400.
Stoll, A. and Seebeck, E. (1948). Uber Alliin, die genuine Muttersubstanz des Knoblauchols. 1. Mitteilung uber Allium Substanzen , Helv. Chim Acta, 31, 189-210
Thatte U, Bagadey S, Dahanukar S Modulation of programmed cell death by medicinal plants . Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2000 Feb;46(1):199-214
Uchida Y, Takahashi T, Sato N. [The characteristics of the antibacterial activity of garlic] . Jpn J Antibiot 1975 Aug;28(4):638-42 (translated for author by Hiro Tadao)
Weber ND, Andersen DO, North JA, Murray BK, Lawson LD, Hughes BG. In vitro virucidal effects of Allium sativum (garlic) extract and compounds . Planta Med 1992 Oct;58(5):417-23
Yoshida S, Kasuga S, Hayashi N, Ushiroguchi T, Matsuura H, Nakagawa S. Antifungal activity of ajoene derived from garlic . Appl Environ Microbiol 1987 Mar;53(3):615-7
Yoshida H, Katsuzaki H, Ohta R, Ishikawa K, Fukuda H, Fujino T, Suzuki A. Antimicrobial activity of the thiosulfinates isolated from oil-macerated garlic extract . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1999 Mar;63(3):591-4
VII. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Brian D. and Mike F. for pointing out grammatical and typographical slip-ups. Thanks to Terry B. for relating the anthelminthic potential of garlic (which unfortunately falls outside of my focus on Cryptocaryosis). Thanks to Doug G. for suggesting inclusion of a more user-friendly recap at the end, and to Randy H.F. for requiring clarity on the basis for the emphasis I put on allicin, also to James B. for suggesting an overview of C.irritans ' life-cycle and one lesson on proper sentence construction. None of them bear any responsibility for any deficiencies in the preceding article, and can claim credit for whatever is good in it. [Guys, I didn't use your full names because you may not have wanted me to.]
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
It says that the Allicin in the garlic masks the fish's smell.
I used GVH Garlic/Vitamin Soak and it also helped to build up their immune system so they could effectively fight off the ich. Usually the reason tangs get ich is because they get stressed. You likely see ich right after a tank move, or when you purchase them new, or when there's a sudden change in water param's, but honestly, anything can set them off. It's because they're a weak species and get stressed very easily, making them susceptible to ich.
I know for a fact that this GVH stuff I used works. I'm willing to bet anything that it will work for you too. It should not be used as a way to cure ich completely, because THAT hasn't been proven, but it will keep the ich at bay.
 

yearofthenick

Active Member
Originally Posted by Cranberry
http:///forum/post/3050202
What journal did that come out of?
Horge Cortes-Jorge Jr. was the writer, who wrote this study in 2001. Very little studies have been done by professionals/scientists since, but I know enough people who use it as a way to keep the ich at bay to consider it a viable enough treatment.
 

auroradrvr

Member
Originally Posted by YearOfTheNick
http:///forum/post/3050206
Horge Cortes-Jorge Jr. was the writer, who wrote this study in 2001. Very little studies have been done by professionals/scientists since, but I know enough people who use it as a way to keep the ich at bay to consider it a viable enough treatment.
I looked him up, he's nothing more than a hobbyist. Nothing scientific about him. It seems like there are plenty of generalizations in his "study." And its like he was regurgitating information he read prior.
 

cranberry

Active Member
That's what I was thinking/wondering.
Let me set the scene first here... were old friends sitting around the table with our favorite drinks and snacks having a fun debate about our hobby. Tone can be misunderstood....
Because someone put their opinions in a pretty referenced article doesn't make it a fact. He didn't study anything in the write up... it's all his opinion. The same as any other post. The references look impressive but really go through them. What does any of them have to do with ich and garlic? Now, if those references he cited had studies that directly related to the topic, that would validate his opinion... but they don't. You have to be careful of "Forum Facts". When forums came into play about what? 10 years ago? they were the most thrilling advancement in this hobby.... but as time goes on it has also become a breeding ground for many fallacies. When I really want to research something I read the forums to see what others have to say... I want their experiences. Then I go searching through the scientific journals to make a factual link. When giving out advice I think we need to be careful in saying things like "Studies show" when that's not supported... it gives the receiver a false sense that there actually was a study done.
 
Top