darthtang aw
Active Member
I am not disagreeing with the cop having bruises. Where we disagree is when the threat to the officer ended.
I state it ended when the victim was fleeing and thus did not justify being shot at any further since clearly the officer still had his gun.
You are including all the color commentary.
No one in the pd has disputed the victim was fleeing and unarmed when shot dead. This is the only part of the story that matters according to the law. Listen to all the other color commentary. Until the pd disputes this part the eyewitnesses to the shooting would hold the most sway on a jury in the court of law. Without counter testimony to this no e of the other stuff matters.
I state it ended when the victim was fleeing and thus did not justify being shot at any further since clearly the officer still had his gun.
You are including all the color commentary.
No one in the pd has disputed the victim was fleeing and unarmed when shot dead. This is the only part of the story that matters according to the law. Listen to all the other color commentary. Until the pd disputes this part the eyewitnesses to the shooting would hold the most sway on a jury in the court of law. Without counter testimony to this no e of the other stuff matters.