Search results

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum My definition is any firearm that has semi-automatic capability that can hold a magazine larger than 30 rounds. In most cases, these same firearms can be converted to full auto capability whether it's legal to do so or not. Here's your picture...

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum Yet another idiotic rationalization as to why they shouldn't be banned, or we should restrict their sales. Yes, there's a multitude of other devices that can be used to commit a crime. It's impossible to protect yourself from harm from any inanimate...

If they have been available for years (which they have in other forms such as the hell fire) why is it they haven't been reported used in any crimes if they are such a bad thing? I can modify a flare and propane bottle into something a lot more lethal, are we going to ban them too?

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum Brother. You claim to own one of these firearms, and you don't even know the "accessories" you can add to them? This guy almost emptied his 100-round drum in under a minute, but it jammed on him twice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3KOKS_HwQU Look...

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum How do you define a firearm that has the capability of holding a 100-round drum that can be emptied in a matter of a few minutes, a kid pop gun? A semiautomatic that lacks the full auto or select fire capability of a military grade weapon and if you think...

Quote: Originally Posted by RainbowGrouper Remember me? This picture

I remember the name and the picture seems familiar.

Quote: Originally Posted by GeriDoc How often are those suits successful? Always wondered about that.

I am actually starting to feel sorry for poor ol Carney. being the mouth piece for "the most transparent administration is a dirty job but someone has to do it. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/30/white-house-on-defense-over-new-benghazi-emails-claims-controversial-prep-call/

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum The Supreme Court has become more of a dictatorship that an unbiased group of legal experts. They vote more along their political beliefs and ideologies than they do by what the Constitutional laws dictate. Name one? I give you Jesse Helms, Strom...

Thats all you had? I figured you had some report of something. You listed one incident twice and two are poor examples. The cop already owned guns so he didn't buy the gun to do the job cause he was pissed and the Evan Ebel deal was an organized hit, not a casual crime. I've looked for stats on...

Post em up. I'd be interested to see how many guns were less than a month after legally purchased.

Until the laws are changed in regard to reporting mental health issues there's no point in discussion background checks as a solution.

The fine is BS and he should fight it. The NBA wont have to force him out. His own sponsors will do that. The sad part of this is the NBA won't want to find the best owner for the team, they'll insist a black person gets the team. Watch it happen.

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum You're one to talk. Which suite are you staying in? Oh burn LOL!

Don't you know it is Bush's fault 0bama called in armed snipers to collect back grazing fees.

Quote: Originally Posted by Darthtang AW So state senate or house seats dont matter? Or mayoral races dont matter? Arent you the same guy complaining about your local politics far more than the national level. Apparently those election matter far more. Election fraud is election fraud. It...

And after all the diversions the fact remains 0bama invites tax cheats to the white house.

Quote: Originally Posted by AggieAlum ROFLMAO. No it doesn't. But your Obama Hatin' Tea Bagger spin trying to make it look like Obama condoned his actions is laughable at best. I see you keep ignoring the fact that Bush welcomed him with open arms, WHEN HE WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE...

ROFLMAO! So the fact he began his tax evasion before 0bama was elected somehow makes it no big deal?