Originally Posted by
acrylics
http:///forum/post/2529352
My take FWIW.
Despite what anybody thinks were the reasons for going there and despite what anybody thinks the timeframe *should have* been; the simple fact is that we are there and what do we do about it?
IMO we practically destroyed their infrastructure in order to get Saddam. We owe it to the people of Iraq to put it back together. To leave now without doing so would be a mistake of epic proportions IMO. No one really knows if some other country would go in there and try to take over but that would be no different than what they had before. If no one else goes in there, we leave it to someone else to clean up our mess. Either way, we will have made yet another enemy. Again, IMO we owe to the Iraqi people and to ourselves to not allow that to happen.
I personally think we will be there indefinitely and rightly so. We owe that much to the people that live there until their new government asks us to leave. And even then we will most likely build permanent bases there to keep them safe from an attack from others and to protect our own interests as I doubt they will be able to build an army in short order and will require, if nothing else, a defensive force supplied by us.
We can leave Iraq and make yet another enemy (and rightly so) or we can stay and make a trade partner if not a long lasting alliance. More importantly, we are responsible for much of the mess in Iraq and it's our responsibility to help clean it up.
So point fingers all you want, it's utterly useless and does absolutely nothing to resolve the situation at hand, the fact is that it makes the situation worse as it is divisive in nature. Sit here and complain about whose fault it is or have a constructive discussion on how to make things better and focus energy in a more positive direction. The choice is yours.
It's too bad more people can't think beyond what is in their partisan interests and look at the big picture.