Big Bang Theory .... Who lit the fuse?
- Thread starter bigarn
- Start date
el guapo
Active Member
Originally Posted by bigarn
http:///forum/post/3082174
All guesses welcome.
Originally Posted by EL GUAPO
http:///forum/post/3082096
300 grams of protein via protein shakes,200 grams of Creatine 3 egg's , chicken for lunch , chicken for dinner . It smells like somebody was in the midst of giving a skunk a perm when they decided to stop and stuff it up a dead chickens rear .
Do we really need two threads about the same topic ?
http:///forum/post/3082174
All guesses welcome.
Originally Posted by EL GUAPO
http:///forum/post/3082096
300 grams of protein via protein shakes,200 grams of Creatine 3 egg's , chicken for lunch , chicken for dinner . It smells like somebody was in the midst of giving a skunk a perm when they decided to stop and stuff it up a dead chickens rear .
Do we really need two threads about the same topic ?
green machine
Member
God spoke and BANG it happened. 
tank a holic
Active Member
kaley cuoco?
coral keeper
Active Member
.
mantisman51
Active Member
Something from nothing. Perfect science (fiction).
mantisman51
Active Member
I don't know and certainly the pointy-headed scientist who kneel down and worship (by faith) at the alter of evolution don't know. But it beats having to think about there being a God out there.
mantisman51
Active Member
Two problems with your last post:
1) I didn't say there was a God, I said it was a way to explain away the possibility of a God.
2) Any scientist who publicly states their belief that there may be a God somehow involved is excommunicated by scientists.
Since I'm not a Catholic, I don't have to defend the stupidity of stupid men who called themselves, "God on Earth". Folks who believed like me were tortured and killed by the same people who persecuted scientists.
1) I didn't say there was a God, I said it was a way to explain away the possibility of a God.
2) Any scientist who publicly states their belief that there may be a God somehow involved is excommunicated by scientists.
Since I'm not a Catholic, I don't have to defend the stupidity of stupid men who called themselves, "God on Earth". Folks who believed like me were tortured and killed by the same people who persecuted scientists.
coral keeper
Active Member
I'm curious, if evolution is true, where did we get wright and wrong from? Why do we always say 'God bless America' and 'In God we trust' on money if evolution is true?
mantisman51
Active Member
CK, man you're great(I don't mean that sarcastically), I like the way you think. But life-long agnostics and atheists are gonna eat that statement for dinner. They are going to say, "Because that's what religious nuts think. Not that it is true. And those same nuts want to cram their religion down everyone's throat."
coral keeper
Active Member
Thanks!
Also, evolution is the same thing as putting a bunch of airplane parts on the floor and just waiting until it turns into a full functioning airplane. Its not going to happen! Someone has to make it.
Also, evolution is the same thing as putting a bunch of airplane parts on the floor and just waiting until it turns into a full functioning airplane. Its not going to happen! Someone has to make it.
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by mantisman51
http:///forum/post/3082492
Two problems with your last post:
1) I didn't say there was a God, I said it was a way to explain away the possibility of a God.
Fair enough. We've had this discussion before, however.
2) Any scientist who publicly states their belief that there may be a God somehow involved is excommunicated by scientists.
Since I'm not a Catholic, I don't have to defend the stupidity of stupid men who called themselves, "God on Earth". Folks who believed like me were tortured and killed by the same people who persecuted scientists.
That's entirely fair too.
I did not say there was no God myself.
I am simply unable to accept that the Christian version of "God" is the Truth.
It's all supposition. If the bible is correct in its assertations, then its religions cannot be correct in putting said "God" in a box.
At that point it seems to me that a 13.3 billion year old universe is more believable than a white bearded ape-like being in whose image we were supposedly created.
http:///forum/post/3082492
Two problems with your last post:
1) I didn't say there was a God, I said it was a way to explain away the possibility of a God.
Fair enough. We've had this discussion before, however.
2) Any scientist who publicly states their belief that there may be a God somehow involved is excommunicated by scientists.
Since I'm not a Catholic, I don't have to defend the stupidity of stupid men who called themselves, "God on Earth". Folks who believed like me were tortured and killed by the same people who persecuted scientists.
That's entirely fair too.
I did not say there was no God myself.
I am simply unable to accept that the Christian version of "God" is the Truth.
It's all supposition. If the bible is correct in its assertations, then its religions cannot be correct in putting said "God" in a box.
At that point it seems to me that a 13.3 billion year old universe is more believable than a white bearded ape-like being in whose image we were supposedly created.
coral keeper
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3082509
Fair enough. We've had this discussion before, however.
That's entirely fair too.
I did not say there was no God myself.
I am simply unable to accept that the Christian version of "God" is the Truth.
It's all supposition. If the bible is correct in its assertations, then its religions cannot be correct in putting said "God" in a box.
At that point it seems to me that a 13.3 billion year old universe is more believable than a white bearded ape-like being in whose image we were created.
Why do you say that hes a ape-like being?
http:///forum/post/3082509
Fair enough. We've had this discussion before, however.
That's entirely fair too.
I did not say there was no God myself.
I am simply unable to accept that the Christian version of "God" is the Truth.
It's all supposition. If the bible is correct in its assertations, then its religions cannot be correct in putting said "God" in a box.
At that point it seems to me that a 13.3 billion year old universe is more believable than a white bearded ape-like being in whose image we were created.
Why do you say that hes a ape-like being?
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by Coral Keeper
http:///forum/post/3082506
Thanks!
Also, evolution is the same thing as putting a bunch of airplane parts on the floor and just waiting until it turns into a full functioning airplane. Its not going to happen! Someone has to make it.
Actually, the airplane parts being not alive, it's not comparable at all.
Life defies the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Tell me why.
http:///forum/post/3082506
Thanks!
Also, evolution is the same thing as putting a bunch of airplane parts on the floor and just waiting until it turns into a full functioning airplane. Its not going to happen! Someone has to make it.
Actually, the airplane parts being not alive, it's not comparable at all.
Life defies the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Tell me why.