"Hostel"....don't believe the hype

pontius

Active Member
well, I go to the movies about 4 or 5 times a year. I NEVER go see a movie on opening night. but for the past 2 weeks, all I've read is hype and controversy surrounding this movie "Hostel". everything you'd read about this movie says that it is the goriest, bloodiest movie every made. there are people protesting the movie, saying that the filmmakers went too far. there have been newspaper reports of people having heart attacks in the middle of screenings. I was so drawn in that by the time the movie opened tonight, I had to see it. I was not so interested in the movie as I was on calling the filmmaker's bluff. I wanted to see if they could scare or disturb me as much as they claim. well, they won, because they got my $7.75.
EVERYTHING surrounding this movie is BS hype. it is not 'scary' at all, I really don't know if I'd consider it a 'horror' movie. it is not even close to "The Ring" or "Saw" (neither of which are particularly scary). there are no parts at all in the movie that make you jump, no parts that make your palms sweat.
the story itself is straight forward with no plot twists. the movie is an hour and a half long, the first of which is only about smoking pot and T/A. if you want to see

[hr]
, that's the best part of the movie. the second part of the movie is the "meat" of the story, the part that's supposed to have all the blood and mayhem.
wrong. all the reports and controversy surrounding the gore in this movie are fabrications. there is a little blood here and there, but it is not that gory at all. it is full of the "implied violence" that Hollywood has tried so hard to tell us is "horror". there is no part in the movie where it actually shows anyone being killed (not that that's a good or bad thing, just saying that this is meant to be a horror movie). not only that, this is not even the most gory movie that has Quentin Tarantino's name attached to it....that title goes to "Reservoir Dogs". it is also not as gory as "Saving Private Ryan" or "Passion of the Christ", neither of which are horror movies.
the biggest criticism I've seen of this movie (other than the non-existent gore), is that the ending is bad. actually, the ending is the best part. the ending has the only slight twist to plot, and also, it's the ending....so it's good in 2 ways. all in all, I'd give it a C-. it is worth renting maybe, but definitely not worth going to the movie theater. I'm not a big horror fan at all, I just got drawn into the hype so much that I had to see it. just to let you all know, it's not what they make it out to be.
 

pontius

Active Member
actually, worse. there was a lot of undue hype surrounding "Blair Witch Project", but it at least WAS somewhat original, and good enough to have stupid people believing it was all true.
this movie was like a cheap ripoff of "Saw". it tried to be darker and more gory than "Saw", but it didn't match up at all. it's story was not even as good as the story in "Saw".
 

pontius

Active Member
no, but the reviews I've read are awful.
there have been rumors around that Quentin Tarantino will write and direct a new "Friday the 13th" movie.....not like a sequel, but like a retake on the original. THAT would be the mother of all horror movies. I hope it is true. I hope he was just attaching his name to "Hostel" as a means of getting his foot into the 'horror' door.
 
J

jcrim

Guest
No horror movie compares to the Exorcist. Actually the first Friday the 13th was pretty good.
 

pblrdom

Member
i saw wolf creek..................................................
It was the wort movie i have ever seen!!
Litterly, my GF loves the scary movies, so i have to go sit through them. I almost fell asleep it was so bad. It drags on and on and on and on. I wanted to leave. The main plot comes in like 20-30 mins before the end, and its just plain stupid and freakin weird.
 

danedodger

Member
I haven't seen Hostel yet but I've seen all the others mentioned here. I'm a big horror fan just because I've been searching for a movie out there that could actually scare me! Not a single one has so far. The closest I've ever come to being scared by a movie was When a Stranger Calls because the thought of some lunatic killer calling me from within my house is a creepy thought plus anything happening to my two precious babies like that is pretty horrifying for me!
Saw was pretty decent, I thought. It didn't scare me at all but it had some cool ideas going on through it. More of a psychological thriller in my book.
Maybe we're both just too jaded, Pontius
 

darth tang

Active Member
Checxk out Devil's rejects and the exorcism of emily rose...both very good...didn't scare ( I don't scare easy) But it freaked my girl out.
 

celacanthr

Active Member
Exorcism of emily Rose wasn't scarey, but had a really good story IMHO.
As for the exorcist, it made me jump a little and cover my eyes a few times, but nothing horrificly scarey...and this was when I was 10!
 

darth tang

Active Member
I think the reason emily rose freaked her out is the basis that it was true............when looked at that way I can see why it might be scary.
 

celacanthr

Active Member
yeah, I can see why that would scare people. But I have grown up in a fairly superstitious family, but mostly from tradition, so ghosts, demons, and ghost/demon stories don't really bother me at all
 

darth tang

Active Member
The other night I got on the floor in the living room and got in the position emily was in when her boyfriend woke up at night, while my girlfriend was in the kitchen....She didn't find it funny to say the least when she saw me, But I got a good laugh from her reaction. lol
 

celacanthr

Active Member
lol, you are so mean darthy!
Well, I can usually freak out people, by doing that thing where she like bends her spine backward (you know the church scene). I am super flexy! Oh, and that girl that did the leg over her shoulder walk (well, I guess two different ghost girls did it: In the Ring, and in the Grudge), is always a good choice to freak people out.
:hilarious :hilarious
 
J

jcrim

Guest
Originally Posted by Darth Tang
Checxk out Devil's rejects and the exorcism of emily rose...both very good...didn't scare ( I don't scare easy) But it freaked my girl out.
Exorcism of Emily Rose disturbed my girl too because it was true. She woke up the next couple nights after seeing it thinking she smelled smoke. lol. She won't even watch the previews now when they come on. :scared:
 

mitzel

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darth Tang
Checxk out Devil's rejects and the exorcism of emily rose...both very good...didn't scare ( I don't scare easy) But it freaked my girl out.
I thought the devils rejects was a let down . I loved house of a 1000 corpses . and couldn't wait for devils rejects. But ROB let me down. It starts out good and crazy but then it doesn't go very far .
 

happyvac

Member
I don't understand why you'd wanna watch something scary. I've never seen a horror movie, and I don't plan to :/
 

puffer24/7

Active Member
it is not scary, it is just sick and yes it is a very good movie so just shut it, it is a very good movie and every one should go see it in my opinion
 

darth tang

Active Member
Originally Posted by mitzel
I thought the devils rejects was a let down . I loved house of a 1000 corpses . and couldn't wait for devils rejects. But ROB let me down. It starts out good and crazy but then it doesn't go very far .

And see, House of a thousand corpses was a let down for myself where devil's rejects wasn't. Mainly because there were so many comtroversies of if rob would get the house released as it was supposed to be horrific and gory beyond belief.
Devils rejects reminded me of Natural born killers without the psychadelic crap, more blood, but more demented characters.
 

darth tang

Active Member
Originally Posted by puffer24/7
it is not scary, it is just sick and yes it is a very good movie so just shut it, it is a very good movie and every one should go see it in my opinion

........................................................
****must remember you are 15****
 
Top