intersting rant

jazzyz

Member
found this while researching, its old but what do u guys think.??
Denitrification Explained- Don't Bother
by cheroske-at-ocf.berkeley.edu (Jay Cheroske)
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 1994
It's really sad that such a simple issue has become so tangled and
convoluted, but I'll admit right off that it's easy to become confused when
the industry makes money off of people's confusion. In a nutshell,
DENIRIFICATION IS BU-at-%#*IT. It's not worth the trouble or the money to try
and set up a denit filter. Many people would have you believe there is no
way to remove NO3 from a tank without resorting to biological reduction.
This of course is totally wrong.
There are three ways to remove nitrate from a tank: 1) Use denitrification
to reduce NO3 to N2 gas, via anarobic bacteria, which then bubbles out of
your tank, or 2) Place some higher plants or macroalgae in your tank, which
will take up the NO3 and sequester it (it can then be harvested), or 3) Set
up an algal scrubber, which will remove NO3 from the water more effectivly
than the previous two.
The problem with denitrification is that it's a pain to set up, you're not
really sure it's doing anything, strange stuff can come out of your denit
filter if something goes wrong, and finally, the water that comes out of
the filter is almost totally depleted in O2. Just think what the RedOx
level of that stuff must be!!!
Higher plants and macroalgae work good except that they have a tendency to
take over your entire tank. I would recomend placing your plants on a rock
that is easially removed so that when you harvest the stuff you can see if
it's starting to spread. Remove the rock and pull off any strands that have
attached themselves to other rocks. This method is very effective at
removing NO3 and has the added benefit of adding O2 to your tank, which
raises RedOx levels.
Lastly we come to the mighty algal scrubber, the most effective filter in
the world. I'm not going to describe a scrubber--there are plenty of good
books with lots of info, but I will say that no filter offers the benefits
of a scrubber with the ease of use. During they day the scrubber lights can
be turned off because RedOx levels are higher during the day.
Photosynthesis by plants (and in the case of a reef tank, corals and other
symbionts) raises RedOx levels. At night, RedOx levels typically fall
significantly because there is no photosynthesis taking place. This where
the scrubber really shows its beauty--the scrubber is turned on opposite
the tank lights so that there is no drop in RedOx levels overnight. Your
stuff never has to deal with a period where conditions are
less-than-optimum.
In my opinion there are two types of aquarists out there-- those that
prefer to set up a balanced system that basically takes care of itself
without the use of such things as ozone, strange filter medias, CO2
injectors, controllers, etc., and those that feel that in order to maintain
an aquarium, every factor that can be controled externally should be
controlled externally. Just check out the "high-tech reef system" in Moe
for an example. The industry loves this second type because they can sell
him/her all these useless gadgets and charge an arm and a leg for them. The
downside of this is that a) many people spend money on things they do not
need, and b) it makes people outside the hobby view it as an expensive and
complicated pursuit, and scares them away. As for which method works
better, a look at our dying planet should tell you-- whenever mankind tries
to improve on mother nature he always screws things up.
I've bought lots of stuff that I wish I'd never purshased (XNitrate for
one) and don't want other hobbists to waste their money on things they do
not need. Reading a FAMA usually provides me with a small amount of useful
info and a lot of frustration because I see so many ads for products that
are basically useless.
<flame on>
The following is not need in a reef tank:
trickle filter, carbon, poly filter, ozone, any other filter media,
controller, reactor, denit filter.
<flame off>
what is needed:
bright light, algal scrubber, protein skimmer (maybe), good live rock, good
tank plant growth, high flow rate, some type of sediment trap (could be 100
micron filter bag, sponge in overflow, gravel on bottom, etc.)
Now I just sit back and wait...
Jay
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Some very good and interesting points IMO, but feel he's way off base, because some of those hi tech gadgets just make life easier and they are needed at times to supplement
C02 injectors, controllers, etc
. The article is old and again some of these gadgets make life easier....Just like the controllers......How easy is it to look at your monitor, and see what your PH or temp is!!!!????? :notsure: Or instead of having tons of bulky timers you have a controller and a relay and your ballasts plug right into that and it takes up less space.......
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Sorry to post again on the same thing, but I read down further and see where he says Protein skimmer (maybe)??? It can be done, but studies have proven the tank is more efficient with a skimmer.......He's funny!!!!!!!!!
what is needed:
bright light, algal scrubber, protein skimmer (maybe), good live rock, good
tank plant growth, high flow rate, some type of sediment trap (could be 100
micron filter bag, sponge in overflow, gravel on bottom, etc.)
Now I just sit back and wait...

Yes gravel, no skimmer possibly, and yeah just sit back and wait......I will agree with the algal scrubber, good LR, and high flow rate.
 

swlover

Member
I think he forgot to mention..no over feeding, water changes and low populations too. I use plants also, not just in SW but FW too..this does make a difference. I have been keeping FW for over 20 yrs..if you want to keep a tank balanced plant it! Yes many things can take over but if you keep them weeded out like any veggie garden, they produce great results..you can't beat mother nature. I firmly believe in natural over mechanical..and I refuse to pay high prices for things that may or may not work, and I hate adding chemicals, when the answer is a natural way. I can see where he states about the PS... Mangrove takes care of excess proteins, although I do have a skimmer in one tank...another I do not, I used to have a skimmer with the mangrove to see how well they actually work...and found less and less scum in the cup as time went on, so instead of having yet another mechanical device running..I removed it. I think it's all a balancing act, I have read of experts in the field do not even have filters of any kind..everything in the tank has a purpose, not just because it's cool or pretty..they all work together to form a natural habitat, which is something I would like to try one day.
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by acrylic51
[B

bright light, algal scrubber, protein skimmer (maybe), good live rock, good
tank plant growth, high flow rate, some type of sediment trap (could be 100
micron filter bag, sponge in overflow, gravel on bottom, etc.)
Now I just sit back and wait...[/B] :
For the sake of this hobby I'm glad this clown faded into obscurity. Of course, he's from Berkeley...
 

bang guy

Moderator
Originally Posted by jazzyz
what is an algal scrubber??
It's basically a refugium designed around growing algae.
 

acrylic51

Active Member
I'm not saying all his point are bad, some are very good IMO, what credentials does this guy actually have in the hobby or in the biology field?
 

dogstar

Active Member
Yea, his point is denitrification methods. Natural nitrate removal. Most people just do waterchanges that do the job fine as long as theres no huge bio-load....And I will also agree, many people run reefs without any other filteration than live rock. But again, a low bioload....
I like my fully stocked tank and my refugium with algea scubbing/nitrate absorbing macros and deep sand bed keeps nitrates at 0 and helps reduce the amounts of waterchanges for me anyways.....I even use bioballs toooooo.....and very little to no maintanance so I cant say its a PITA or ''BU-at-%#*IT''
Refugiums are gooooood things IMO with other benifits other than just denitrification..
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Originally Posted by Dogstar
Yea, his point is denitrification methods. Natural nitrate removal. Most people just do waterchanges that do the job fine as long as theres no huge bio-load....And I will also agree, many people run reefs without any other filteration than live rock. But again, a low bioload....
I like my fully stocked tank and my refugium with algea scubbing/nitrate absorbing macros and deep sand bed keeps nitrates at 0 and helps reduce the amounts of waterchanges for me anyways.....I even use bioballs toooooo.....and very little to no maintanance so I cant say its a PITA or ''BU-at-%#*IT''
Refugiums are gooooood things IMO with other benifits other than just denitrification..
 

poniegirl

Active Member
Originally Posted by swlover
I have been keeping FW for over 20 yrs..if you want to keep a tank balanced plant it!

OMG! You just rock! I have been in a battle with my tank and I think you may have found my missing link. Bless you!
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by PonieGirl
OMG! You just rock! I have been in a battle with my tank and I think you may have found my missing link. Bless you!
Plants can help, but they are not neccessary. If you are in a battle with your tank something else is at issue.
 

swlover

Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
Plants can help, but they are not neccessary. If you are in a battle with your tank something else is at issue.
Ok what makes you say they are not? If it wasn't for my well planted tank..I would have lost everything in the winter of 93 when the ele. went out for almost a week due to a huge snow storm, we had a wood stove and propane heaters, I would say they are neccessary..especially when things like that happen. I think the majority of ppl rely too much on mechanical devices to do everything..then when they are faced with something like power outage and have no natural back up..all they can do is sit and watch the tank die...thats a pretty expensive lesson. I'm currantly looking into SW plants that do specific things, and I'm deffinately going to put them in there, they say we are due for the worst storms ever this year..we live in a very rural place, who knows how long it will take for the power ppl to get us up and running, I just can't take the chance, not if I can do smething about it.
 

swlover

Member
Originally Posted by PonieGirl
OMG! You just rock! I have been in a battle with my tank and I think you may have found my missing link. Bless you!
Absolutely they can help...they can't hurt. What things are you going thru? Is it FW or SW? If it's FW I can help you, many common house hold plants can be grown in FW tanks, fish also benefit from eating them.
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Originally Posted by swlover
Ok what makes you say they are not? If it wasn't for my well planted tank..I would have lost everything in the winter of 93 when the ele. went out for almost a week due to a huge snow storm, we had a wood stove and propane heaters, I would say they are neccessary..especially when things like that happen. I think the majority of ppl rely too much on mechanical devices to do everything..then when they are faced with something like power outage and have no natural back up..all they can do is sit and watch the tank die...thats a pretty expensive lesson. I'm currantly looking into SW plants that do specific things, and I'm deffinately going to put them in there, they say we are due for the worst storms ever this year..we live in a very rural place, who knows how long it will take for the power ppl to get us up and running, I just can't take the chance, not if I can do smething about it.

His statement of saying they aren't necessary is a proven fact, that they aren't need to run a successful or thriving system.......Again it depends on what type of plant your talking about as well.......There are people that don't run any type of fuge with macros, that have awesome thriving tanks, so it's been proven they aren't a MUST......Regardless if you rely on mechanical filtration or not, as long as it is effective and maintained properly and working is really now reason to sterotype people only using mechanical filtration as being a bad thing.....Same would go for people who believe a tank can be overskimmed or don't do water changes.......Every system will run differently and you won't get the same results using the same methods on 2 separate tanks...
As far as PonieGirls' comment it was just vague saying she might have figured out her issue with her system and 1Journeyman was just asking what issues she's having.....
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by swlover
Ok what makes you say they are not?...
as Acrylic pointed out, the fact that many marine tanks run successfully without them allows me to say they aren't neccessary. I've been behind the scenes at four public aquariums and none of them use plants for filtration.
Swlover, don't get me wrong, I love using macro algaes in a refugium. In fact, I just received today a shipment of manatee and shoal grass that's going straight into my refugium. I'm also one of the few people running a HQI 150wt light on my refugium. I value plants...
Poniegirl stated she has a "battle" going on in her tank. Plants aren't a silver bullet.
 

poniegirl

Active Member
Originally Posted by acrylic51
His statement of saying they aren't necessary is a proven fact, that they aren't need to run a successful or thriving system.......Again it depends on what type of plant your talking about as well.......There are people that don't run any type of fuge with macros, that have awesome thriving tanks, so it's been proven they aren't a MUST......Regardless if you rely on mechanical filtration or not, as long as it is effective and maintained properly and working is really now reason to sterotype people only using mechanical filtration as being a bad thing.....Same would go for people who believe a tank can be overskimmed or don't do water changes.......Every system will run differently and you won't get the same results using the same methods on 2 separate tanks...
As far as PonieGirls' comment it was just vague saying she might have figured out her issue with her system and 1Journeyman was just asking what issues she's having.....
What I said was "You Rock". Not vague in my book.
How can you say that photosynthesis (plants exchanging "bad" elements for "good" ones) is not necessary? It is so basic. It is NOT just plants using light to grow. A fact that I have overlooked, myself, and plan to remedy.
I do know that I had a very balanced tank that I thought was being over-run by caulerpa, so I got rid of it. Every strand. Now I fight nitrates, have bizarre bubbles and cyano.
Let's explore some theory and see what happens!
 

acrylic51

Active Member
PonieGirl it can be said that running a system without macros will work....It's been done and being done.....Alot of people have a misconception or and idea that this would negate other aspects of filtration.....No type of filtration be it macro, mechanical or such is 100% affective 100% of the time....You can't say that "running macros" is a key to a successful system.....
Just as you have people that don't like dumping raw tank water into their fuge......So basically the fuge w/macros is only going to remove a small part of "bad" and only so fast, so with common sense you would still need other parts of a system working in unison to complete the process of removal of the "bad"....
His statement on carbon, and protein skimmer is just "insane"......There isn't to many people out there that could set up a macro system large enough to handle the load requirments most of us put on our systems....We just don't have the space for a system of that size, so it's pointless to make a statement like that, because if that was the case alot of the big guns would just take a 10 gallon tank and fill it with macros and be done with it.......The nutrient exportion ratio has to be equal to handle the system removal requirments........A protein skimmer strips the water of DOC helping to make the exportation that much easier on the macro system, because again, because of space limitations, we don't have enough room to house enough macros to be 100% effective......
Can you show me any proof or data that macros help with discoloration or removing harmfuls such as carbon? :notsure: Ozone is used mostly to help with water clarity....again it's not needed, but again we have to change with the modern luxuries of what man has to offer, and again I go back to my statement earlier, that if we all had the space requirments to set up a large macro export center some of this might and could possibly be negated, but we don't want that clutter in our living room or bedroom do we??? That's why alot of people worry or have to sacrifice on skimmer space do to space constraints instead of getting a good powerful skimmer......
Tanks have been run successfully on nothing more than LR, LS, and water changes, so again the "must have macro exportation" is wrong......
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Originally Posted by PonieGirl
OMG! You just rock! I have been in a battle with my tank and I think you may have found my missing link. Bless you!
You are "vague" when you say you think you've found the missing link with your tank? What were the issues you were having????
 
Top