Originally Posted by
milomlo
I was just told on another thread to mix Oceanic and IO 50/50 and you will get just about perfect calcium, ALK, and ph. I may do that as I just bought a new bucket of Oceanic.
I say that is what we all do. Birdy just posted that Oceanic's calcium is too high and alk and PH is to low.
Why don't we have a thread where everyone posts what they find with newly mixed salts from all brands.
Is that a good idea? This is the information I myself would like to know.
I can say I was using Corallife Salt mix and it's calcium is also very high - so I switched to Oceanic (I am now mixing my first batch using some Oceanic with the last bit of my corallife).
After 24 hours here are the results
3 gallons of water 1 cup Corallife 1/2 cup Oceanic
SG 1.025
PH 8.0
Calcium 640
dKH 9.0
Anyone else have information to add? Should we start another thread about this or is anyone even interested.
I'm intersted but what I think we are all going to find is manufaturing practices make these tests vary from time to time.
My husband works for a major food and pet food manufacturing facility and what we have found out in his 30 years of employment (with a lab onsite) is as technology changes and as the price of certain additives change, companies compensate by cutting costs where they deem appropriate - and the public is seldom informed of those changes. If the companies put "new and improved" on a label, they would be changing it multiple times a year due to demand in ingredients and changes in manufacturing which ultimately change scientific results and values. I believe that is part of the reason the FDA allows a certain amount of latitude when it comes to food.
One thing I also wonder if water quality has something to do with the results everyone would receive if they tested an identical product. Also, one must factor in incorrect reading of tests and the different testing product brands on the market that make precise readings virtually impossible and would be open to a lot of interpretation.
While I am no scientist by any stretch of the imagination, I cannot help but wonder if temperature and quality of water will have something to do with the results as well.
Another thing to think about, is the higher priced salts that are on the market are not sold in the volume the less exdpensive priced ones are. When market share has a hold on the public, the public tends to hear more negative news or reviews on the major player than they do the minor player in any chosen market when doing a comparison such as this.
I would venture to guess Kent and the rest of the products out there have also had problematic batch problems - the difference is sales are much lower therefor they do not grab the attention of the typical hobbiest or LFS.
Denise M.