I did some playing around in Photoshop and might have some useful information. Forgive me if I'm repeating information...
The nominal amp draw of a 175w MH system at 120v is 1.8 amps, so the 175 I traced out in the model number correlates with what the amp draw appears to be, so I would say it's a safe bet to conclude that he's got a 175w system.
PFO included a suffix in their model which is totally unreadable as you indicated to designate whether this is a probe start of pulse start system.
IMO, I'd just select a 175w, SE, probe start lamp. A pulse start ballast will ignite a probe start lamp just fine as well as a pulse start, but a probe start will not ignite a pulse start. So by using a probe start lamp, the system should work regardless of what ignition style the ballast uses. As long as you have the wattage right there should be no safety issues doing that, and although the label is not clear, if we *think* that the upper field has a 175 in it, and we *think* that the lower field has a 1.8, and these figures correlate, then I'd say that's fairly conclusive.
BTW... I'd agree with other posts that state that the socket being pulse rated is no indication of what ballast technology is in use.