Originally Posted by
sepulatian
http:///forum/post/2784153
Lowered salinity is alright for a few months, after that it becomes stressful. Kidney failure is a big problem with prolonged lowered salinity. The fish are not used to that low of SG. Their body functions properly in a SG of about 1.025.
Do you have a source for this? I'm not 2nd guessing, I'd just like to get up to date on this subject. I admit that I've been flying by the seat of my pants in this hobby for many years. This forum has taught me plenty; and proven me wrong more than once. I did a quick bookshelf check and both Bob Fenner & Mike Paletta say most fish do just fine at 1.020. Fenner also mentions the big commercial outfits going as low as 1.017, but doesn't elaborate on long term effects of SG this low.
I don't often use my own experience as "proof"; but I kept a lot of fish at 1.017-1.018 for many years without incident. I had at least 10 fish that were 8-10 years old lost to Katrina and spent all their captivity at that low SG. (Not easy fish either) They were as healthy & active active as any tanks I've kept. If I didn't get into reefs, and the additional work involved with 2 batches of change water; I'd still be keeping fish in my dead coral tanks at that low level.
Just food for thought: wouldn't the physical effect on fish that were moved to a sg of about 1.017 be similar to the effects on fish captured at greater than normal depths (like many anthias, bandit angels, etc) and kept basically at sea level? It seems to me that the pressure of the deeper water would mimic increased SG. Maybe being too simplistic; but, hey, old guys need to learn too.