License to Drive vs. Right to Travel

snakeblitz33

Well-Known Member
Did you know that a license is not required to be able to drive on public roadways to do private business or personal travel? It's the Right to Travel, and was ruled upon many times by the Supreme Court. The only time you are required to have a license is when you are a commercial driver on the clock, and need proof of age for an activity such as gambling and buying alcohol.
 

pegasus

Well-Known Member
Since the state requires that one give up Rights (in this case, Right to Travel) in order to exercise the privilege of driving, the regulation cannot stand under the police power, due process, or regulation, but must be exposed as a statute which is oppressive and one which has been misapplied to deprive the Citizen of Rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the state constitutions.

The whole system is broken. We're being taxed on taxes, too... :mad:
 

pegasus

Well-Known Member
Streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure.

"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived."
Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22?1;
Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934;
Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607;
25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163

and ...

"The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579

So we can see that a Citizen has a Right to travel upon the public highways by automobile and the Citizen cannot be rightfully deprived of his Liberty. So where does the misconception that the use of the public road is always and only a privilege come from?

"... For while a Citizen has the Right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that Right does not extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in part, as a place for private gain. For the latter purpose, no person has a vested right to use the highways of the state, but is a privilege or a license which the legislature may grant or withhold at its discretion."
State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073;
Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171;
Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256;
Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516

According to the Constitution, only commercial drivers should have to have a license, as they drive for private/personal gain. Somewhere along the line, states started requiring ALL drivers to carry a license. What most people don't realize it that is IS a Constitutional Right... until you sign your driver's license. At that point, you relinquish your right to free travel as a driver, and it does indeed become a "privilege" that can be regulated, penalized, revoked, and /or denied. However, you still have the right to use public roads and highways as a passenger. This is just a single example of how we've let government turn a Constitutional Right into a "privilege"... that we have to pay to be granted. There are far more unalienable rights that have been gradually taken away, and nobody has really noticed.​
 

snakeblitz33

Well-Known Member
Technically, you could let your license expire and not renew or re-sign the document, which gives you back your right to freely travel.
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Fortunately the courts have shown more reading (and reasoning) ability than shown in the interpretations given above. Hundreds of cases have affirmed that states cannot infringe on travel rights, but that is very different from operating a vehicle on public roadways, where an operating license may be required. You are free to travel as you will, but you must demonstrate whatever skills the state requires in order to operator a motor vehicle.
 

crhawkeye

New Member
Write to travel vs privilege to drive are two different subjects. Write to travel is the freedom to move from state to state. The privilege to drive is granted to those willing to abide by the laws, anything else would be anarchy.
 

snakeblitz33

Well-Known Member
Write to travel vs privilege to drive are two different subjects. Write to travel is the freedom to move from state to state. The privilege to drive is granted to those willing to abide by the laws, anything else would be anarchy.
I don't think that I trust your interpretation of the law if you don't understand the difference between write and right.
 
Top