iopusl
Member
Ok I recently stumbled upon Shane Graber's Skimmer Design 101 web page. I have finally have had enough with my Seaclone and decided to use this page as a guide to build my own 4' Counter current protein skimmer.
My display tank is a 55g with a 20g long used as sump/refugium. I have a Mag 3 pumping from the fuge back up to the display at a about a 3' rise with a generic overflow going back down. The Mag 3 at 3' is rated for 300gph. Following the Explanation on Graber's page, the flow through a counter current should be around 55gph. The flow rate should be 3/4 the total gallons.
55+20=75 * .75 = 56.25
My original plan was to have the skimmer fed straight off the overflow of the display. But the 300gph is a hell of lot more than 55gph, and I'm not going through all this work so that this skimmer is ineffective. So now I have to divert alot of the water coming out of the overflow somewhere else besides the skimmer. This is what I came up with:
Have the overflow from the display run into a T adapater on its side first used as an overflow, and have the bottom of the T feed the skimmer through a ballvalve to reduce the flow on the skimmer. Then I plumb the output of the skimmer straight up so that it is a 1/2" lower than the T overflows output. I figure this way the skimmer shouldn't have any problems in competing with the T overflow for water.
Anyone out there done anything even close to this ?
Will this Work ?
Is this really stupid ?
Am I missing something ?
Any input out there is appreciated
Thanx
My display tank is a 55g with a 20g long used as sump/refugium. I have a Mag 3 pumping from the fuge back up to the display at a about a 3' rise with a generic overflow going back down. The Mag 3 at 3' is rated for 300gph. Following the Explanation on Graber's page, the flow through a counter current should be around 55gph. The flow rate should be 3/4 the total gallons.
55+20=75 * .75 = 56.25
My original plan was to have the skimmer fed straight off the overflow of the display. But the 300gph is a hell of lot more than 55gph, and I'm not going through all this work so that this skimmer is ineffective. So now I have to divert alot of the water coming out of the overflow somewhere else besides the skimmer. This is what I came up with:
Have the overflow from the display run into a T adapater on its side first used as an overflow, and have the bottom of the T feed the skimmer through a ballvalve to reduce the flow on the skimmer. Then I plumb the output of the skimmer straight up so that it is a 1/2" lower than the T overflows output. I figure this way the skimmer shouldn't have any problems in competing with the T overflow for water.
Anyone out there done anything even close to this ?
Will this Work ?
Is this really stupid ?
Am I missing something ?
Any input out there is appreciated
Thanx