Originally Posted by
jcrim
Well who could argue with that??? With those powers of stating obvious, nonspecific, politically-correct rhetoric, you should write presidential campaign speeches. I can see it now, "Education is important. Terrorism is bad. Health care is necessary." (Any similarities to Bush's 2004 campaign speeches is purely coincidental.) LOL
I thought this was going to be an intelligent discussion. Maybe you could address specific species, (you are aware that there are different species of sharks with different needs, right?) and success or failure with various systems. Unfortunately, your last post shows that you cannot do this based on actual experience. Until that's possible, I guess you should just regurgitate some basic principles about your knowlege. You may respond with arguments such as, "fish need water..." or "fish should be happy..."
If this is going to be the quality of the discussion then I will have to end the discussion with the classic retort, (hands over ears) "La, la, la... I'm not listening to you, la, la, la."
he did show you an arguement and you chose to pretty much ignore everything he said. how old are you anyway 10? you should also not critisize someone that cares about the well being of a fish. if you can't keep a fish alive for more than 6 months maybe you should take your fish back to the store and get a freshwater tank because that's probably where you belong. also what's the point of gettin a fish if you plan on getting rid of it in the near future.