dannywwhite
New Member
Hi there. So i have a 70 gallon saltwater with a kole yellow eye tang. I love the yellow tang and the sailfin tang but im wondering since i heard the rule about tangs if that's ok? Either a sailfin or yellow (not both)
Tangs!
- Thread starter dannywwhite
- Start date
mr llimpid
Member
Sorry to say neither. You have one of the tang that I would recommend for that size tank. And one also due the size since tangs of similar shape will fight.
malosli
New Member
The indie-rock songwriter composed and developed a short work in one night as part of “The 24 Hour Musicals.†ZAPATA, TEX. - The driver was wearing a deputy's uniform and swore he was a real law officer. But to the Border Patrol agents manning a checkpoint here, something just looked funny about the pickup truck with Webb County sheriff decals.Manchester City manager Roberto Mancini joked on Friday that it was a shame striker Carlos Tevez had not been arrested again this week as he might have scored another hat-trick when they make the trip to Everton.The “Henri Labrouste†exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art casts this 19th-century French architect as a radical reinventor of public spaces.AL-RAM, WEST BANK - When the game was finally over, after extra time and penalty kicks, the Palestinian squad had lost to Thailand. But the Palestinian national team's first official soccer match on home turf Wednesday gave thousands of raucous fans who braved a cold and rain-lashed night a tast...When Taliban leaders return from Pakistan Panic away to begin their annual offensive in Afghanistan, a
senior U.S. commander believes they will undertake a major assassination campaign against local and tribal Afghan leaders and others who in recent months have begun cooperating with government... The theater critics for The New York Times answer readers’ questions about musical adaptations, their biggest disappointments of the season and what awards season means.
You’ll need a few shore things for a day at the beach.
“The
Sweeney†follows Jack Regan, the leader of an elite London police unit whose tactics emulate those of the thugs it pursues.
U.S.
stocks posted the biggest weekly decline in three months after American International Group reported a $61.7
billion loss, Warren Buffett said the economy is in "shambles" and General Electric faced increased concerns that it will be stripped of its top credit rating.
Atlanta's six-time All-Star catcher Brian McCann is ready to come off the disabled list on
Monday when the Braves open a series in Cincinnati. "If mobile phone use would be a risk factor, you'd expect cancer Vision without glasses review have a higher amount of usage," Professor Martin Roosli, who
conducted the study, published this week in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, tells Reuters.
The research was partly funded by cellphone operators, the news service adds, although they had no part in the study's design, analysis or interpretation of data.
Studies link blood proteins to subset of disorder, suggest diagnostic test Not many Environmental Protection Agency administrators are likely to belt out a Stevie Wonder tune when discussing the importance of air quality. Some of the nation’s biggest companies argue that the federal law that denies recognition to same-sex couples forces
them to treat its gay employees differently than its heterosexual employees.In aid of Comic Relief, the first 25 people to sponsor this blog chose a subject that would be covered in it. This blog is the result of combining those 25 random subjects in a seriously scientific way[Earlier this week, I asked for 25 different subjects that I would combine into one surreal science blog in aid of Comic Relief. H Miracle to enforce a form of austerity on the population motivated largely by ideological concerns. Sound familiar?Akhenaten was also largely forgotten by history after he died, society went back to how it was before his meddling and later rulers called him 'the enemy'.
So that's something to look forward to.The belief that history repeats itself is almost entirely contrary to Hume's problem with inductive reasoning. Hume argued that you technically cannot infer something will[/b] definitely happen from a limited set of observations.[/b]
Your neighbour[/b] may leave for work at 8am every morning, but you cannot say "my neighbour will leave for work at 8am tomorrow" and actually "know" this is the case in the classical[/b] sense. Just because something has happened before, there's no guarantee that it will happen again in the same way. This does somewhat undermine the whole concept of scientific research, which is unnerving.
Also, Hume would probably not have been able
to sit quietly when watching The Matrix.But
science isn't the sort to accept it when philosophy undermines it.
Hume's argument[/b] Fit Yummy Mummy somewhat if the Many World's Theory is taken into account. Derived from models[/b] of quantum physics/mechanics, the Many Worlds Theory claims every event on any scale that could result in different outcomes actually causes the universe to split into different universes where each possible outcome does occur.
So if it's[/b] possible, it does technically happen.
Screw you, Hume and your single-universe bias!It's profound. Potentially each roll[/b] of the dice creates six separate universes. And in each one, the Monopoly game still ends in a blazing row.
Sci-fi[/b] dabbles in parallel universes a lot. But we don't know[/b] if[/b] it's true, and if it is, we[/b] have no idea how to cross between universes. The barrier that separates universes is never really acknowledged, but undoubtedly it's very interesting, like the tight junctions between polarized epithelial cells.Epithelial cells themselves form a barrier between cell masses and spaces, and the barriers between them provided by tight junctions must
be doing double duty. They're like "metabarriers" or something.They might be easily ignored, but they're crucial, they Total Wellness Cleanse the important functions of epithelial cells to occur, like forcing critical ions to travel through the cells, rather than around them.Tight junctions exist thanks to big molecules though, and big molecules are boring. They shouldn't be. Many are essential for life, and these tend to form in space. SPACE!Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can be found in abundance in space, usually in nebulae. They're quite complex long chain molecules that are critical for sustaining
all
known forms of life.
Some even believe these space molecules lead to life on Earth.
If it happened here, there's nothing to say that it wouldn't happen elsewhere.
Should we start discovering signs of life out in the universe, the field of Astrobiology is going to really take off (possibly literally).
Astrobiology is the study of life elsewhere in the universe. They don't dissect stars or anything, mores the pity. It's been a purely theoretical field so far, but if life is discovered elsewhere, maybe the Astrobiologists will be the ones who get all the science groupies.
That would be Fat Loss 4 Idiots would give us neuroscientists a break.
Ironically, these molecules that may have caused humankind
to exist are largely toxic to modern humans. It's almost as if, having created us, the molecules now think we should be destroyed, like their Frankenstein's monster.
That's a bit much, being considered vermin by a benzene ring.But evolution is often weird like that.
Important stuff ends up becoming antagonistic. Take teeth. Human teeth have evolved in such a varied way to facilitate our omnivorous diet. But human teeth have shrunk over the centuries to leave room for our big skulls and the like, meaning we end up with wisdom teeth, which show up late and just cause hassle. No matter how important they are, when teeth go wrong they cause no end of grief.But as surprisingly weird as our teeth can be, nature has produced some dental arrangements that could put the Saw franchise to shame in terms of flesh-rending creativity. The best example of this is probably Helicoprion, a long-extinct prehistoric shark (sort of) with
a lower jaw Visual Impact Muscle Building review essentially a toothy chainsaw. It's lower
"jaw" was
a spiral of teeth that could have been extended and withdrawn, giving it a buzz saw effect.
It was like a party whistle, except instead of colourful paper and a vaguely annoying noise, it provided horrifically aquatic mutilation, which would ruin any child's birthday party.Ifit's a weird evolutionary quirk, odds are a fish has done it at some point. They are seeming masters at quick and diverse occupation of all manner of niches. This is well demonstrated by East African Haplochromine Cichlid fish, an excellent example of explosive adaptation as they have developed into a very diverse type of fish occupying numerous niches in the East African great lakes in a relatively short period of time. They provide many good example of sexual dimorphism and also demonstrate things like mouthbrooding; something which no human is capable of and anyone who tries to disprove this should be arrested.But
even fish we'd think of as 'normal' can do weird things.
Herring may seem nondescript but they exhibit Muscle Gaining Secrets behaviour too.
Herring communicate by farting. Herring have good hearing, and this may be so they can hear the
squeaky flatulence produced by others at night, and thus remain in a shoal for
safety.
The fact that they use fart sounds to maintain safety really does give a whole new spin to the phrase "silent but deadly".
Other weird senses have developed
in fish, but not exclusively. Birds, like salmon and turtles, have the apparent ability to see the Earth's magnetic field, which
helps with navigation. One mechanism for how they do this is that they have a special type of crypotochrome in their eye which produces magnetically-sensitive free-radical pairs when activated by certain wavelengths of light.
I used to work next to a building with an MRI scanner in it, and it was always covered with birds.
No wonder, it must have looked like Las Vegas to them.Another driver of evolutionary diversity is sexual selection.
In animals as in humans, the desire to
obtain a sexual partner often leads to ridiculous outcomes.
Take Grow Taller 4 Idiots of a moose. How ridiculous do they look? How much effort must it take to grow those things, and then keep your head up when you've done that? The antlers exist purely to aid moose mating habits. During mating season, a bull will find a mate and use his antlers to deter any rivals, or use the antlers as weapons in combat if a love rival is not deterred by antler size alone. Once mating is
complete, the antlers just fall off, their role fulfilled. Given that they're solitary, moody creatures that wield needlessly ornate weapons, I'm wondering if Klingons evolved from a moose-type creature.(N.B. "moose" is both the singular and plural term.This might be because moose are solitary creatures, you rarely see more than one so a separate plural hasn't proliferated. The same thing may have happened with "sheep", but for the opposite reason as you never see a lone sheep)Sexual prowess is a powerful evolutionary factor. Some animals take it too far though, like the unremittingly sexy Koala. You can just Fibroids Miracle charisma pouring out of the screen in that last link.Koala's think about sex so often their brains are shrinking from atrophy. They are so sexy that they have double the sexual organs that more prudish mammals have.They're even in danger of being wiped out by an STI, that's how bad they are.Although in fairness, it's probably very hard to get a prophylactic that fits a bifurcated penis.These
are all things that evolution seems to have thrown up in the natural world. But when you add the human element, things get even more messy.Evolution has given humans consciousness. Or has it? The nature of consciousness is often more of a philosophical question, than a scientific one.
I've seen arguments that consciousness is the result of complex process, not necessarily dependant on the brain, suggesting you could have a consciousness based on the interactions of biscuits in a barrel if it was complex enough, like some sort of bizarre Turing machine. In
many ways it's weird to try and think about consciousness. It's Ovarian Cyst Miracle like drawing a pencil using a pencil; the information is all there, it gets done, but no understanding occurs between the tool and the outcome.
Consciousness is one of those things we tend to just take for granted because there's not really much alternative. It does get even more confusing when consciousness starts to go a bit wrong though, like when someone develops schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is another thing that is a lot harder to pin down than the general use of the term suggests. Despite differing diagnostic approaches, the general consensus is that schizophrenia is when an individual starts having delusions and hallucinations that they cannot separate from reality (it is NOT multiple personality disorder, that's something else).
There may be a physical underpinning of this if the dopamine hypothesis turns out to be the responsible mechanism, which might help matters.But
human intellect and cognition adds a whole other host of variables to the processes of natural selection. People often refer to it as "survival of the fittest", but even that is debatable.
Take Melt Your Man's Heart he was arguably one of the fittest, most physically capable human beings on the planet. He won so many physical fights and was an unarmed combat master. But he died at age 32, from a bad painkiller reaction, epilepsy, or something else relatively innocuous. Human society seems to throw things at us that physical fitness alone won't be enough to deal with. Many humans try to embrace this while removing the danger, glorifying physical prowess while removing the physical threat.
A good example of this is >WWE
wrestling, where clearly very physically capable athletes do impressive physical things in an attempt to look like their fighting without actually doing that, swapping performance and theatrics for the entertainment provided by less-scripted physical combat. This may seem like a uniquely human creation, but even this must bow to selective pressures.The WWE used to be the WWF, until the World Wildlife Fund made them change. It's weird that the WWF, an organisation dedicated to
conservation, threatened the existence of the WWE. Ironic, in a way.This goes get him back forever how the things humans create
are subject to pressures of their own, and need to adapt.The JML Point and Paint decorating system shows this. It exists based on a totally artificial construct (human homes that need to be painted according to societal norms) and came into existence to occupy a niche that humans had yet to fill (painting is a lot of hassle). It's not all good though. Human invention can fill niches and spaces that, at best, really should be best left
alone, exploiting the negative, base elements of human culture.
Things like Heat magazine, which is something that exists purely to exploit the bile, resentment and just plain evil that exists in modern humans.
It's function appears to be to glorify celebrities, pointing out to readers that these individuals are superior and should be aspired to, and also gleefully pointing out their flaws and failings, to show that even they are little more than mere scum.
This bizarre duality serves to just make everyone feel bad about everything. (Disclaimer: I'm only yeast infection no more above is true, as I've never read Heat)But humans
have a bizarre tendency to attack others based on the flimsiest of reasons.
We're very social creatures, and a lot of our sense of self-worth from being a member of a group (or culture, or society etc.) As a result, we seem to be very wary of those who aren't members of our group, leading to things like discrimination and prejudice. This is most starkly evident with the victimisation of minorities, where members of different group are attacked with the knowledge that they lack the numbers to do anything about it.
This happens to all manner of minorities, like recently with trans people. There are many possible explanations for this sort of behaviour (scapegoating, social learning), but it's never acceptable.But human society and invention doesn't affect just humans, it also affects other animals, which also have to learn to adapt and endure in these newly-created hostile environments. Take an animal that has a long history with humans, the domestic dog, and let's take a well sold out after crisis of a hostile human environment, in this case Albert Square from the soap opera Eastenders, which is a dangerous place.There have been several dogs of note that were able to survive in Albert square, such as Wellard (Belgian Shepherd dog), Betty (Cairn terrier), Terrence (Lhasa Apso), Willy (Pug) and more. It could be possible to determine which of these dogs, if any, was the best suited to survive there, but it would be difficult to rule out subjective measurements.For example, a dog with properties that allows it to be accepted by multiple owners would be beneficial for the chaotic environment of Albert Square, so Wellard, living with 4 separate owners during his time there, would be considered the best dog using this criterion.However, would it be not more advantageous to adopt a behaviour and quality that means one owner is more keen to keep you and avoid dangerous situations as a result, suggesting that Willy the pug (one owner for 7 years) is possibly the best dog. Then again, Chips the Basset lottery cash software away as soon as
someone left the gate open, suggesting his survival instinct is the most highly developed.Ifthere's one thing dogs like, it's sticks.They love chasing sticks.But if you have a best dog, it could also be said that you should have a best stick with which to entertain it with. Sticks are typically made of wood, and there is a lot of variation in wood.
Would a stick of bamboo be best? Its hollow tubular structure would make it good for throwing and wielding as a weapon, but does its rigid nature means it could more often shatter on impact with a hard surface? A stick of cork would be light and safe, but so porous and spongy as to be hard to hurl, and no use for defence at all.
The mechanical properties of the woods could be tabulated and cross compared to see if there is a 'best stick'.If you tabulate both the best dogs and the best sticks and give them ranks, it may be possible to The Secret of deliberate creation there's any connection between them using Spearman's Rho, a statistical technique used to determine if there's a linear relationship between two variables that have
undergone rank randomisation. If there is a connection between the best dog (in Albert square) and the best stick, it would suggest that in even the most artificial of human environments, selection pressures and evolution are still working to shape our world. Maybe I'm giving human invention too much credit.
Maybe it's more limited than I've previously suggested. Maybe some human inventiveness ends up in cul-de-sacs, much like evolution can sometimes do.
Tom Lehrer was a maths wiz who was also a gifted and celebrated writer of satirical songs which are still being sung today, but eventually he just got bored with it, and stopped. So invention isn't the be-all and end all in itself for everyone.Maybe at some point we'll find a sustainable harmony where the natural world and human needs and invention can coexist without competing. We could obtain the energy we need from nature reserves, via turbines ex boyfriend guru have waterfalls, solar power if there's room, and even hydrogen from algae if that's an option. We may not even need a sustainable equilibrium, as long as we keep trying to achieve one. Natural processes and human endeavour; these things are only going to get more important as we progress. They've apparently just found water on Mars. They've not found methane yet, but they still might do.
And if they find both water and methane on Mars, you know what that means...Farting space herring! It's the only explanation.Dean Burnett may never speak in coherent sentences again after writing this. His fragmented mind can be observed via Twitter, @garwboyACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
alisonatkin, who wanted to hear about the mating habits of the moose. Filth!Kim Kendall, who wanted to include schizophrenia, which she's interested in.Or suffers from (I forget)Rob Simpson, who often discusses the magnetic vision of birds on his podcast with Chris Lintott, Recycled ElectronsThe generous anonymous donor who wanted to include the victimisation of minorities, either because they didn't understand the intent of this post or save my marriage today a dark sense of humourKate Paice, who is a fan of saw-toothed HelicoprionChris Limb, who was hoping I could elaborate on the nature of consciousness (foolishly) Martine O'Callahan who wanted to hear about Bruce LeeKate Shaw, who insisted on including Heat magazine, and so made the world a worse place all roundHelen Lynn, for her childish enthusiasm for farting herringDomino, for a weirdly specific interest in East African haplochromine cichlid fishEljay, for a love of AstrobiologyStu, Anna and Riley for suggesting the JML Point and Paint decorating system (they don't work for the company, I'm told)Gia Millinovich, continuing her interest in high-profile influential men by suggesting Pharaoh AkhenatenAlice Sheppard, who is forever going on about polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in space so decided I should too.Emma McDonald for Spearman's Rho, which she shall suffer forDan Mitchell, who wanted to know what the best stick was.I'll publish the data when I get itSimon Feeley, who wanted to hear about the best dog in Eastenders. He was my
best man.
Twice.
Never againLewis Bowman, for requesting ex2 system of Tom Lehrer. I assume he meant it as a subjectAnother anonymous donor wanted the many worlds theory. In another dimension, it was done properly no doubt@randomdoorbell for wondering about energy from nature reservesDr Allen Alan for his assertion that Koalas are unremittingly sexyMark Lorch who wanted to hear about Hume's problem with inductive reasoning.
Happy now, Mark?@LizzyBenedikz who wanted to hear about tight junctions between polarized epithelial cells.
As you doLin2i, who wanted to hear about teeth.
I'm assuming she has her own, but you never knowDaN McKee, for requesting WWE wrestling.
Possibly a first for the science sectionComic ReliefPsychologySpaceHistory of sciencePhilosophyEastEndersDogsDentistryEvolutionMedicineDean Burnettguardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
| Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds Authoritative. This is characterized by clear limits on the child set by the parents in a caring, noncoercive manner. Toby Moses reviews the latest appsWhen is free not really, quite, free? Well, EA's shiny new addition to its high-spec driving series, guy gets girl 3 (Firemonkeys, iOS/Android) won't charge you a penny to download it on to a chosen handset. So off you go, driving a gorgeously rendered automobile around a beautifully realistic track, swinging the handset from side to side to steer. The problems come at the end of the race. In-game currency has to be shelled out to repair the car, change the oil and generally keep it well tuned. It drains the resources to such an extent that if you want to upgrade the vehicle, or purchase a new one, it's nearly impossible without actually stumping up in all-too-real pounds. While the game itself is as enjoyable as ever, the balance between upgrading through skill or real-world wealth is all wrong.Cutthe Rope: Time Travel (ZeptoLab, iOS, 69p/£1.99),in contrast, also offers in-app purchases, but this sequel to the enjoyable physics puzzler doesn't make it a requirement to enjoy the game.As before, the aim is to feed monstrous Om Nom some candy, but now he's joined by a fellow green blob – who changes outfits text the romance back levels traverse the ages. It adds a variety to the challenge, without detracting from the expert craft of the puzzles, and makes for a sequel that builds upon what was great about the first instalment.AppsGamesToby Mosesguardian.co.uk
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds Campaigners call for action after eighth straight rise in serious injuries among cyclists, while overall road deaths fall 8%Road casualty figures dropped last year to the lowest overall level since records were first collected almost 90 years ago, according to government statistics, but deaths and injuries among cyclists bucked the trend by rising sharply.Cycling groups are demanding urgent government action to stem cyclist casualty numbers, which are going up more quickly than the increase in riders on the road. Cyclist deaths rose 10% during 2012, with serious injuries up by 4%, the latter increasing for an eighth consecutive year.It is the only area where road casualties are rising, aside from
a the jump manual in the number of seriously injured pedestrians, another vulnerable group.The
Department for Transport (DfT) statistics show that the total number of road deaths fell 8% year-on-year
to 1,754, the lowest since such figures were first collected in 1926. Serious injuries fell by 0.4%, and remain 15% lower than the 2005-9 average.At 145,571, the number of recorded road accidents in which someone was injured was lower than in any years other than 1926 and 1927, despite the vastly greater number of vehicles in use now.This was reflected in reduced casualty numbers for just about every road user. Among motorcyclists there was a 9% drop in deaths and 5% decline in serious injuries.In contrast, the number of cyclists killed on the roads rose from 107 in 2011 to 118 last year, with serious injuries rising to 3,222. The DfT report notes: "There is a well-established upward trend in pedal cyclist casualties; this is eighth year that the number of seriously injured cyclist casualties has increased."While the number of cyclists on
the roads has increased in recent the simple golf swing in some cities, campaign groups argue that it has not increased as rapidly as the number of deaths and injuries.The
DfT report also notes that 2012's unusually wet spring and summer – the April to June period was the second rainiest on record – is likely to have pushed down casualty figures for cyclists, as well as for pedestrians and motorcyclists, as people chose other transport options in the wet.British Cycling said the statistics were very disturbing.Its policy director, Martin Gibbs, said: "Although the number of people cycling is increasing, the number of casualties is increasing at an even faster
rate.If the government is serious about getting Britain cycling we need to ensure that cycling is built in to all new road developments and junctions."Jason Torrance, policy director of Sustrans, said: "The 118 people who died riding a bike on our roads this year have died needlessly and must surely spur the government
into immediate action to make our roads safer."It
is unacceptable that seriously injured cyclist casualties have increased eight years tinnitus miracle system safety of cyclists must be included at the heart of the
design of our roads as a requirement of all future schemes and a review of the safety of cyclists using
existing roads must take place."The
increase in cycling casualties has baffled many campaigners, particularly given the generally
observed "safety in numbers" effect in which more
cyclists on the roads tends to make riding safer overall.
Studies have shown that risky or
illegal behaviour by cyclists is rarely the cause of serious accidents.In April an all-party group of MPs released a report on
how to boost the number of Britons cycling, spelling out a series of specific recommendations on segregated lanes and other safety infrastructure. However, since then the government has not said whether it supports such moves.TransportRoad safetyCyclingTransport policyPeter Walkerguardian.co.uk
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
| Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds Michael Del Zotto scored a short-handed goal and set up Rick Nash's game winner to lead the New York Rangers to a 3-2 victory over the struggling New Jersey Devils on Tuesday
senior U.S. commander believes they will undertake a major assassination campaign against local and tribal Afghan leaders and others who in recent months have begun cooperating with government... The theater critics for The New York Times answer readers’ questions about musical adaptations, their biggest disappointments of the season and what awards season means.
You’ll need a few shore things for a day at the beach.
“The
Sweeney†follows Jack Regan, the leader of an elite London police unit whose tactics emulate those of the thugs it pursues.
U.S.
stocks posted the biggest weekly decline in three months after American International Group reported a $61.7
billion loss, Warren Buffett said the economy is in "shambles" and General Electric faced increased concerns that it will be stripped of its top credit rating.
Atlanta's six-time All-Star catcher Brian McCann is ready to come off the disabled list on
Monday when the Braves open a series in Cincinnati. "If mobile phone use would be a risk factor, you'd expect cancer Vision without glasses review have a higher amount of usage," Professor Martin Roosli, who
conducted the study, published this week in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, tells Reuters.
The research was partly funded by cellphone operators, the news service adds, although they had no part in the study's design, analysis or interpretation of data.
Studies link blood proteins to subset of disorder, suggest diagnostic test Not many Environmental Protection Agency administrators are likely to belt out a Stevie Wonder tune when discussing the importance of air quality. Some of the nation’s biggest companies argue that the federal law that denies recognition to same-sex couples forces
them to treat its gay employees differently than its heterosexual employees.In aid of Comic Relief, the first 25 people to sponsor this blog chose a subject that would be covered in it. This blog is the result of combining those 25 random subjects in a seriously scientific way[Earlier this week, I asked for 25 different subjects that I would combine into one surreal science blog in aid of Comic Relief. H Miracle to enforce a form of austerity on the population motivated largely by ideological concerns. Sound familiar?Akhenaten was also largely forgotten by history after he died, society went back to how it was before his meddling and later rulers called him 'the enemy'.
So that's something to look forward to.The belief that history repeats itself is almost entirely contrary to Hume's problem with inductive reasoning. Hume argued that you technically cannot infer something will[/b] definitely happen from a limited set of observations.[/b]
Your neighbour[/b] may leave for work at 8am every morning, but you cannot say "my neighbour will leave for work at 8am tomorrow" and actually "know" this is the case in the classical[/b] sense. Just because something has happened before, there's no guarantee that it will happen again in the same way. This does somewhat undermine the whole concept of scientific research, which is unnerving.
Also, Hume would probably not have been able
to sit quietly when watching The Matrix.But
science isn't the sort to accept it when philosophy undermines it.
Hume's argument[/b] Fit Yummy Mummy somewhat if the Many World's Theory is taken into account. Derived from models[/b] of quantum physics/mechanics, the Many Worlds Theory claims every event on any scale that could result in different outcomes actually causes the universe to split into different universes where each possible outcome does occur.
So if it's[/b] possible, it does technically happen.
Screw you, Hume and your single-universe bias!It's profound. Potentially each roll[/b] of the dice creates six separate universes. And in each one, the Monopoly game still ends in a blazing row.
Sci-fi[/b] dabbles in parallel universes a lot. But we don't know[/b] if[/b] it's true, and if it is, we[/b] have no idea how to cross between universes. The barrier that separates universes is never really acknowledged, but undoubtedly it's very interesting, like the tight junctions between polarized epithelial cells.Epithelial cells themselves form a barrier between cell masses and spaces, and the barriers between them provided by tight junctions must
all
known forms of life.
Some even believe these space molecules lead to life on Earth.
If it happened here, there's nothing to say that it wouldn't happen elsewhere.
Should we start discovering signs of life out in the universe, the field of Astrobiology is going to really take off (possibly literally).
Astrobiology is the study of life elsewhere in the universe. They don't dissect stars or anything, mores the pity. It's been a purely theoretical field so far, but if life is discovered elsewhere, maybe the Astrobiologists will be the ones who get all the science groupies.
That would be Fat Loss 4 Idiots would give us neuroscientists a break.
Ironically, these molecules that may have caused humankind
to exist are largely toxic to modern humans. It's almost as if, having created us, the molecules now think we should be destroyed, like their Frankenstein's monster.
That's a bit much, being considered vermin by a benzene ring.But evolution is often weird like that.
Important stuff ends up becoming antagonistic. Take teeth. Human teeth have evolved in such a varied way to facilitate our omnivorous diet. But human teeth have shrunk over the centuries to leave room for our big skulls and the like, meaning we end up with wisdom teeth, which show up late and just cause hassle. No matter how important they are, when teeth go wrong they cause no end of grief.But as surprisingly weird as our teeth can be, nature has produced some dental arrangements that could put the Saw franchise to shame in terms of flesh-rending creativity. The best example of this is probably Helicoprion, a long-extinct prehistoric shark (sort of) with
a lower jaw Visual Impact Muscle Building review essentially a toothy chainsaw. It's lower
"jaw" was
even fish we'd think of as 'normal' can do weird things.
Herring may seem nondescript but they exhibit Muscle Gaining Secrets behaviour too.
Herring communicate by farting. Herring have good hearing, and this may be so they can hear the
squeaky flatulence produced by others at night, and thus remain in a shoal for
safety.
The fact that they use fart sounds to maintain safety really does give a whole new spin to the phrase "silent but deadly".
Other weird senses have developed
in fish, but not exclusively. Birds, like salmon and turtles, have the apparent ability to see the Earth's magnetic field, which
helps with navigation. One mechanism for how they do this is that they have a special type of crypotochrome in their eye which produces magnetically-sensitive free-radical pairs when activated by certain wavelengths of light.
I used to work next to a building with an MRI scanner in it, and it was always covered with birds.
No wonder, it must have looked like Las Vegas to them.Another driver of evolutionary diversity is sexual selection.
In animals as in humans, the desire to
obtain a sexual partner often leads to ridiculous outcomes.
Take Grow Taller 4 Idiots of a moose. How ridiculous do they look? How much effort must it take to grow those things, and then keep your head up when you've done that? The antlers exist purely to aid moose mating habits. During mating season, a bull will find a mate and use his antlers to deter any rivals, or use the antlers as weapons in combat if a love rival is not deterred by antler size alone. Once mating is
are all things that evolution seems to have thrown up in the natural world. But when you add the human element, things get even more messy.Evolution has given humans consciousness. Or has it? The nature of consciousness is often more of a philosophical question, than a scientific one.
I've seen arguments that consciousness is the result of complex process, not necessarily dependant on the brain, suggesting you could have a consciousness based on the interactions of biscuits in a barrel if it was complex enough, like some sort of bizarre Turing machine. In
many ways it's weird to try and think about consciousness. It's Ovarian Cyst Miracle like drawing a pencil using a pencil; the information is all there, it gets done, but no understanding occurs between the tool and the outcome.
Consciousness is one of those things we tend to just take for granted because there's not really much alternative. It does get even more confusing when consciousness starts to go a bit wrong though, like when someone develops schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is another thing that is a lot harder to pin down than the general use of the term suggests. Despite differing diagnostic approaches, the general consensus is that schizophrenia is when an individual starts having delusions and hallucinations that they cannot separate from reality (it is NOT multiple personality disorder, that's something else).
There may be a physical underpinning of this if the dopamine hypothesis turns out to be the responsible mechanism, which might help matters.But
human intellect and cognition adds a whole other host of variables to the processes of natural selection. People often refer to it as "survival of the fittest", but even that is debatable.
Take Melt Your Man's Heart he was arguably one of the fittest, most physically capable human beings on the planet. He won so many physical fights and was an unarmed combat master. But he died at age 32, from a bad painkiller reaction, epilepsy, or something else relatively innocuous. Human society seems to throw things at us that physical fitness alone won't be enough to deal with. Many humans try to embrace this while removing the danger, glorifying physical prowess while removing the physical threat.
A good example of this is >WWE
alone, exploiting the negative, base elements of human culture.
Things like Heat magazine, which is something that exists purely to exploit the bile, resentment and just plain evil that exists in modern humans.
It's function appears to be to glorify celebrities, pointing out to readers that these individuals are superior and should be aspired to, and also gleefully pointing out their flaws and failings, to show that even they are little more than mere scum.
This bizarre duality serves to just make everyone feel bad about everything. (Disclaimer: I'm only yeast infection no more above is true, as I've never read Heat)But humans
have a bizarre tendency to attack others based on the flimsiest of reasons.
We're very social creatures, and a lot of our sense of self-worth from being a member of a group (or culture, or society etc.) As a result, we seem to be very wary of those who aren't members of our group, leading to things like discrimination and prejudice. This is most starkly evident with the victimisation of minorities, where members of different group are attacked with the knowledge that they lack the numbers to do anything about it.
This happens to all manner of minorities, like recently with trans people. There are many possible explanations for this sort of behaviour (scapegoating, social learning), but it's never acceptable.But human society and invention doesn't affect just humans, it also affects other animals, which also have to learn to adapt and endure in these newly-created hostile environments. Take an animal that has a long history with humans, the domestic dog, and let's take a well sold out after crisis of a hostile human environment, in this case Albert Square from the soap opera Eastenders, which is a dangerous place.There have been several dogs of note that were able to survive in Albert square, such as Wellard (Belgian Shepherd dog), Betty (Cairn terrier), Terrence (Lhasa Apso), Willy (Pug) and more. It could be possible to determine which of these dogs, if any, was the best suited to survive there, but it would be difficult to rule out subjective measurements.For example, a dog with properties that allows it to be accepted by multiple owners would be beneficial for the chaotic environment of Albert Square, so Wellard, living with 4 separate owners during his time there, would be considered the best dog using this criterion.However, would it be not more advantageous to adopt a behaviour and quality that means one owner is more keen to keep you and avoid dangerous situations as a result, suggesting that Willy the pug (one owner for 7 years) is possibly the best dog. Then again, Chips the Basset lottery cash software away as soon as
Would a stick of bamboo be best? Its hollow tubular structure would make it good for throwing and wielding as a weapon, but does its rigid nature means it could more often shatter on impact with a hard surface? A stick of cork would be light and safe, but so porous and spongy as to be hard to hurl, and no use for defence at all.
The mechanical properties of the woods could be tabulated and cross compared to see if there is a 'best stick'.If you tabulate both the best dogs and the best sticks and give them ranks, it may be possible to The Secret of deliberate creation there's any connection between them using Spearman's Rho, a statistical technique used to determine if there's a linear relationship between two variables that have
undergone rank randomisation. If there is a connection between the best dog (in Albert square) and the best stick, it would suggest that in even the most artificial of human environments, selection pressures and evolution are still working to shape our world. Maybe I'm giving human invention too much credit.
Maybe it's more limited than I've previously suggested. Maybe some human inventiveness ends up in cul-de-sacs, much like evolution can sometimes do.
Tom Lehrer was a maths wiz who was also a gifted and celebrated writer of satirical songs which are still being sung today, but eventually he just got bored with it, and stopped. So invention isn't the be-all and end all in itself for everyone.Maybe at some point we'll find a sustainable harmony where the natural world and human needs and invention can coexist without competing. We could obtain the energy we need from nature reserves, via turbines ex boyfriend guru have waterfalls, solar power if there's room, and even hydrogen from algae if that's an option. We may not even need a sustainable equilibrium, as long as we keep trying to achieve one. Natural processes and human endeavour; these things are only going to get more important as we progress. They've apparently just found water on Mars. They've not found methane yet, but they still might do.
And if they find both water and methane on Mars, you know what that means...Farting space herring! It's the only explanation.Dean Burnett may never speak in coherent sentences again after writing this. His fragmented mind can be observed via Twitter, @garwboyACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
alisonatkin, who wanted to hear about the mating habits of the moose. Filth!Kim Kendall, who wanted to include schizophrenia, which she's interested in.Or suffers from (I forget)Rob Simpson, who often discusses the magnetic vision of birds on his podcast with Chris Lintott, Recycled ElectronsThe generous anonymous donor who wanted to include the victimisation of minorities, either because they didn't understand the intent of this post or save my marriage today a dark sense of humourKate Paice, who is a fan of saw-toothed HelicoprionChris Limb, who was hoping I could elaborate on the nature of consciousness (foolishly) Martine O'Callahan who wanted to hear about Bruce LeeKate Shaw, who insisted on including Heat magazine, and so made the world a worse place all roundHelen Lynn, for her childish enthusiasm for farting herringDomino, for a weirdly specific interest in East African haplochromine cichlid fishEljay, for a love of AstrobiologyStu, Anna and Riley for suggesting the JML Point and Paint decorating system (they don't work for the company, I'm told)Gia Millinovich, continuing her interest in high-profile influential men by suggesting Pharaoh AkhenatenAlice Sheppard, who is forever going on about polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in space so decided I should too.Emma McDonald for Spearman's Rho, which she shall suffer forDan Mitchell, who wanted to know what the best stick was.I'll publish the data when I get itSimon Feeley, who wanted to hear about the best dog in Eastenders. He was my
best man.
Twice.
Never againLewis Bowman, for requesting ex2 system of Tom Lehrer. I assume he meant it as a subjectAnother anonymous donor wanted the many worlds theory. In another dimension, it was done properly no doubt@randomdoorbell for wondering about energy from nature reservesDr Allen Alan for his assertion that Koalas are unremittingly sexyMark Lorch who wanted to hear about Hume's problem with inductive reasoning.
Happy now, Mark?@LizzyBenedikz who wanted to hear about tight junctions between polarized epithelial cells.
As you doLin2i, who wanted to hear about teeth.
I'm assuming she has her own, but you never knowDaN McKee, for requesting WWE wrestling.
Possibly a first for the science sectionComic ReliefPsychologySpaceHistory of sciencePhilosophyEastEndersDogsDentistryEvolutionMedicineDean Burnettguardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
| Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds Authoritative. This is characterized by clear limits on the child set by the parents in a caring, noncoercive manner. Toby Moses reviews the latest appsWhen is free not really, quite, free? Well, EA's shiny new addition to its high-spec driving series, guy gets girl 3 (Firemonkeys, iOS/Android) won't charge you a penny to download it on to a chosen handset. So off you go, driving a gorgeously rendered automobile around a beautifully realistic track, swinging the handset from side to side to steer. The problems come at the end of the race. In-game currency has to be shelled out to repair the car, change the oil and generally keep it well tuned. It drains the resources to such an extent that if you want to upgrade the vehicle, or purchase a new one, it's nearly impossible without actually stumping up in all-too-real pounds. While the game itself is as enjoyable as ever, the balance between upgrading through skill or real-world wealth is all wrong.Cutthe Rope: Time Travel (ZeptoLab, iOS, 69p/£1.99),in contrast, also offers in-app purchases, but this sequel to the enjoyable physics puzzler doesn't make it a requirement to enjoy the game.As before, the aim is to feed monstrous Om Nom some candy, but now he's joined by a fellow green blob – who changes outfits text the romance back levels traverse the ages. It adds a variety to the challenge, without detracting from the expert craft of the puzzles, and makes for a sequel that builds upon what was great about the first instalment.AppsGamesToby Mosesguardian.co.uk
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds Campaigners call for action after eighth straight rise in serious injuries among cyclists, while overall road deaths fall 8%Road casualty figures dropped last year to the lowest overall level since records were first collected almost 90 years ago, according to government statistics, but deaths and injuries among cyclists bucked the trend by rising sharply.Cycling groups are demanding urgent government action to stem cyclist casualty numbers, which are going up more quickly than the increase in riders on the road. Cyclist deaths rose 10% during 2012, with serious injuries up by 4%, the latter increasing for an eighth consecutive year.It is the only area where road casualties are rising, aside from
a the jump manual in the number of seriously injured pedestrians, another vulnerable group.The
Department for Transport (DfT) statistics show that the total number of road deaths fell 8% year-on-year
to 1,754, the lowest since such figures were first collected in 1926. Serious injuries fell by 0.4%, and remain 15% lower than the 2005-9 average.At 145,571, the number of recorded road accidents in which someone was injured was lower than in any years other than 1926 and 1927, despite the vastly greater number of vehicles in use now.This was reflected in reduced casualty numbers for just about every road user. Among motorcyclists there was a 9% drop in deaths and 5% decline in serious injuries.In contrast, the number of cyclists killed on the roads rose from 107 in 2011 to 118 last year, with serious injuries rising to 3,222. The DfT report notes: "There is a well-established upward trend in pedal cyclist casualties; this is eighth year that the number of seriously injured cyclist casualties has increased."While the number of cyclists on
the roads has increased in recent the simple golf swing in some cities, campaign groups argue that it has not increased as rapidly as the number of deaths and injuries.The
DfT report also notes that 2012's unusually wet spring and summer – the April to June period was the second rainiest on record – is likely to have pushed down casualty figures for cyclists, as well as for pedestrians and motorcyclists, as people chose other transport options in the wet.British Cycling said the statistics were very disturbing.Its policy director, Martin Gibbs, said: "Although the number of people cycling is increasing, the number of casualties is increasing at an even faster
into immediate action to make our roads safer."It
is unacceptable that seriously injured cyclist casualties have increased eight years tinnitus miracle system safety of cyclists must be included at the heart of the
design of our roads as a requirement of all future schemes and a review of the safety of cyclists using
existing roads must take place."The
increase in cycling casualties has baffled many campaigners, particularly given the generally
observed "safety in numbers" effect in which more
cyclists on the roads tends to make riding safer overall.
Studies have shown that risky or
illegal behaviour by cyclists is rarely the cause of serious accidents.In April an all-party group of MPs released a report on
how to boost the number of Britons cycling, spelling out a series of specific recommendations on segregated lanes and other safety infrastructure. However, since then the government has not said whether it supports such moves.TransportRoad safetyCyclingTransport policyPeter Walkerguardian.co.uk
© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
| Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds Michael Del Zotto scored a short-handed goal and set up Rick Nash's game winner to lead the New York Rangers to a 3-2 victory over the struggling New Jersey Devils on Tuesday
flower
Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannywwhite http:///t/396134/tangs#post_3528752
Hi there. So i have a 70 gallon saltwater with a kole yellow eye tang. I love the yellow tang and the sailfin tang but im wondering since i heard the rule about tangs if that's ok? Either a sailfin or yellow (not both)
Hi, the Kole tang is okay in the 70g, I had one in a 55g and then the 75g. The sailfin is a no, it's going to get big fast.
Originally Posted by dannywwhite http:///t/396134/tangs#post_3528752
Hi there. So i have a 70 gallon saltwater with a kole yellow eye tang. I love the yellow tang and the sailfin tang but im wondering since i heard the rule about tangs if that's ok? Either a sailfin or yellow (not both)
Hi, the Kole tang is okay in the 70g, I had one in a 55g and then the 75g. The sailfin is a no, it's going to get big fast.
neptune89
New Member
The Kole and the yellow would be fine, however I have to agree that the sailfin tang grows pretty quick. You would most likely have to get it out of the 75 in a couple months. With that being said a friend of mine has a sailfin tang in a 55g long and the tang is doing just fine. Its been in there for a couple months and by Christmas time it will need a bigger tank.
btldreef
Moderator
I wouldn't add the yellow.
You can't just go by the size of the fish when considering what size tank they belong in. Tangs are open water swimmers. They like a lot of room and swim all day. A 70g tank is not going to provide for them what they need. You're going to end up with a more aggressive fish that just paces the front glass all day.
As for putting a tang in there until it gets to big;
1) good luck catching it without tearing apart your tank.
2) you will stunt it's growth and cause other health issues, usually related to the stress of not having swimming room
3) tangs are herbivores. Herbivores poop A LOT. They can destroy water quality in a tank that's too small to handle the bioload.
You can't just go by the size of the fish when considering what size tank they belong in. Tangs are open water swimmers. They like a lot of room and swim all day. A 70g tank is not going to provide for them what they need. You're going to end up with a more aggressive fish that just paces the front glass all day.
As for putting a tang in there until it gets to big;
1) good luck catching it without tearing apart your tank.
2) you will stunt it's growth and cause other health issues, usually related to the stress of not having swimming room
3) tangs are herbivores. Herbivores poop A LOT. They can destroy water quality in a tank that's too small to handle the bioload.
aquiman
Member
Yellows can be really nasty. I made the mistake of adding a long nose butterfly that I guess resembled him in color and he beat it to a pulp until it died. I was away and not around to get it out of the tank and felt horrible because I caused it. I still have him and always worry about him when I add a new fish.