Yea, I know there are some abuses, but not everywhere, particularly in the South. In my view, if government can't pay for something, then don't offer it as a state service. Instead, what happens is that employees are defunded, and the same service at the same level is performed.
BTW. Most money states use for services is federal money, not state money. This is tax payer money as well, I realize, but saying that cutting employees is going to save, it does, because just about the only thing the state does pay for (and only partially) are staff positions. If you don't have money, cut the service, and everything that goes with that. The positions, the office space, etc. Usually, though, cut positions just goes somewhere else.....never actually really cut. I know, I used to work in Human Resources. Moving positions around was like playing a Tetris.
BTW. Most money states use for services is federal money, not state money. This is tax payer money as well, I realize, but saying that cutting employees is going to save, it does, because just about the only thing the state does pay for (and only partially) are staff positions. If you don't have money, cut the service, and everything that goes with that. The positions, the office space, etc. Usually, though, cut positions just goes somewhere else.....never actually really cut. I know, I used to work in Human Resources. Moving positions around was like playing a Tetris.