what kind of lighting for a 110

joker_ca

Active Member
my first reef tank, and im getting overwhelmed with all the lighting options. What do u guys think i should get? I want some mushrooms, zoos, anomones, and other soft corals the aquarium is 60"Lx18"Hx24"D, i have a canopy so im going to get a retro system but i dont know whether to get MH, VHO, or PC, what do u guys have that work for the same size aquarium???? :thinking: :thinking: :thinking: :thinking: :thinking:
 

scsinet

Active Member
Well you'd have a lot more options if you weren't lighting anemones. They are pretty demanding when it comes to light and water quality.
If I were you, I'd use metal halide. They are more expensive up front but cheaper to run and maintain, and it's a whole lot easier to buy them up front than to invest in something you'll just end up upgrading in a year (got burned by that one myself
). If your tank has one center brace, I'd use 2x400 at 14,000K. If it has two braces, I'd use 3x250, same wavelength.
If you want to supplement with VHO or PC, then use the same halide config above at 20K and use 10K supplements... maybe (2) 160 watt 5 foot VHOs or something.
 

joker_ca

Active Member
i wanted to do metal halides but i have no idea on which wattage i hear to run three 150w then i hear to run 175w, alos i have been told if i dont have to run three that two MH would be fine and place the anomones under them and less light demanding corals towards the center of tank away from the MH. then i hear different things about pc and vho, like vho's need to be replaced every 6months compared to 1yr for pc's and also that pcs are brighter than vho's.... i really dont trust LFS anymore

by the way its a acrylic aquarium
 

scsinet

Active Member
Well, the thing about lighting is that there is no right way and no wrong way. There are a myriad of choices and each have their pros and cons.
What I tell people is to do their research, talk to a lot of people, and WEIGH what they SEIGH
oh man I'm funny sometimes...
Anyhoo, as far as halide goes, remember that the longer your tank is, the more of them you need because you want nice even lighting as it looks nice. You also do not want to place halide over a center brace or the euro-brace of an acrylic tank, the intense heat may melt them.
I firmly contend that halides are cheaper in the long run to operate than a comparably intense PC, VHO, etc because the bulbs have to be replaced less often, and they are far more efficient than even the most efficient fluorescent. If anyone disagrees with me, they are wrong.
... man i'm on a roll ...
The rule of thumb that I have heard and happen to agree with is that one bulb every 24" of tank width is optimal. You can also try less halides and be creative with placement, but ask yourself if you want to be limited in your aquascaping options, because flow is always erratic, so you are often trying to find a good spot for flow AND light in that situation. It gets worse when you deal with anemones, because they can move around on you if they don't like where they are, and if they pick a dark spot, it can be fatal for them. You need at least two, and if you skip a third, you need supplemental VHO or PC to fill in the gap, and that'll run you near what a third halide will cost. If you are trying to get great lighting on a budget, I'd still stick with what I said above... use 14K. That will run on it's own without supplemental fluorescent, so you save money on that.
From there, it's just a matter of wattage, and that's where you have to strike a balance. 24" is a lot of depth, so if you are ever planning to put clams or other light lovers on the sand, you need at least 250 watt bulbs to maintain intensity at that water depth, or even 400 watt. At the same time, the bigger bulbs you get, the more energy costs and the more water heating (and possibly a dreaded chiller purchase) you'll get.
Like I said, it's a matter of personal choice. If I were you, I'd ask as many people as possible who AREN'T TRYING TO SELL EQUIPMENT. Gather up all the opinions and combine it with some solid reasearch from books, magazines, etc and decide on what you want.
 

sula

Member
Originally Posted by joker_ca
the aquarium is 60"Lx18"Hx24"D
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these dimensions mean he only has 18" of "depth" to light to get to the sand, not 24? SCS, does that change your recommendation for the strength of the Halides? I'm asking because I am researching for a tank of very similar dimensions :joy:
In my case, I already have a VHO set up for supplementation, plus my tank has a center brace so I'm probably just going with 2 halides :notsure: My tank is 20 inches deep (height) so I was thinking 175's ?
 

scsinet

Active Member
Sorry.. brain farted on that one...
Yeah for 18" I'd say 175 is a-ok. I use two 175s on a 55 reef with no supplement. The tank is 18" deep and I am keeping clams and BTAs, the latter of which have split and grown twice, so they are doing fine.
 
Top