Which would be best??

cliffrouse11bas

Active Member
I am a guy on this site going to build me my canopy.
My choices are as follows:
(a)1 175w metal halide with 2 65 watt actinic powercmpacts.
(b)1 175w metal halide with 2 75 watt vho actinics.
(c)4 vho 2 full spectrum 2 actinics.
THe Vho i will not be able to have the dusk/dawn effect.
I want to keep clams sps and acro eveuntually. Will I have enough with one of these setups. I am not going to rush with these corals just want to be able to have enough one day. I have a 29 gallon tank....
Which would be my better choice???
 

slothy

Active Member
i would go with (b)
reason being i personally think VHO tend to bring out color lil better than PC's and if your planing on keeping a clam/sps, mh is almost a must , plus the shimmering effect that mh gives off is cool.
maybe step up to a 250mh, cost shouldnt be that much more
 

iechy

Member
If those are the choices you can fit I'd go with B as well. I think the VHO actinics are a must to supplement the MH as the bring out the colors better and as you stated you can do the dusk and dawn thing by turning on only the actinics.
 

cliffrouse11bas

Active Member
I am defintely going to have the dusk dawn effect if I go with metal halide I think this is a cool thing to have. Tanks look cool with just blue. I want the fish to be happy too. Will 380 watts be too much on my 29 gallon tank?? I dont want to run a chiller...
 
Top