Would You Pay $3500 For A Fish?

michaeltx

michaeltx

Moderator
not I
I have spent 199$ for a fish though. and that was because I had alot of store credit I would not have spent cash money even at that price LOL
Mike
 
renogaw

renogaw

Active Member
I would IF i had that much expendable income. $3500 can be relatively cheap to some people. they wouldn't purchase the fish to resell it if there was no market for it.
 
A

alexmir

Guest
I would not. The most i have payed was 60 for a fish so far, im sure that will go up in time though, hopefully never to 3500 though.
 
T

tizzo

Guest
Originally Posted by gonefishcrazy
http:///forum/post/2605948
Whats the most you are willing to spend? I was on a site yesterday and they had a 2 inch fish for $3499.
WOW!!!!!!!!

What fish?? What kind was it??
 
cowfishrule

cowfishrule

Active Member
absolutely fish had a gem tang that was sold and awaiting pickup.
i found nothing about that fish to be worth 3600.
looks like a black tang with ich. seriously.
 
redman1221

redman1221

Member
I would if I was rich with a lot of money. I have spent 300 for a leopard shark before they were illegal to get under 3ft.
 
aquaknight

aquaknight

Active Member
If my income was a couple more times what it was, sure. Maybe not particularlly those 'commonly uncommon' $3500 fish, but if there was one I definitely liked, absoluetly.
 
T

tizzo

Guest
Originally Posted by gonefishcrazy
http:///forum/post/2606072
Clarion Angel and a Gem Tang each cost $3499 .
The clarion doesn't do it for me, but the gem tang is incredible IMO. That's a beautiful fish. I like the price tag. Helps keep them on the reefs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top