Search results

Quote: Originally Posted by GeriDoc Exactly which religions would be discussed? Judeo-Christian only (actually a minority opinion, or would religions such as the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (see here) qualify for the discussion? That said, I actually see nothing wrong with...

Quote: Originally Posted by mohawkninja I don't understand why you would need a gun in Starbucks.... The thugs aren't buying $7 cups of coffee you know. Thugs go to take the cash, not drink the coffee.

I think the guy made a brilliant business move. A ton of free media and he really didn't do anything that is going to be remembered 6 months down the road because he didn't ban guns, he made a polite request. I am as pro 2nd as the next guy and I wouldn't want open carry demonstrations in my...

I blame George W Obama :) I see nothing wrong with teachers discussing what different religions teach regarding creation as part of the scientific discussion. But how dare we encourage children to think rather than teach them what to think.

Quote: Originally Posted by SnakeBlitz33 Ugh, not DD... I live in the city that the Robinson's and the show is taped in. In fact, since I am a taxidermist, I have mounted a lot of their ducks and other stuff. Some of our mounts have appeared in some of their shows and on some of their...

I have been on a tea kick all summer long. Could be a phase, might be that I've grown the beard out to near Duck Dynasty length and I'm channeling Si.

I dunno man. Not sure what could be worse than gassing your own people. Right now he's losing the hard left. None of this adds up. This is getting deep in the weeds of politics which is his strong suit but he's making all the wrong moves. Him claiming not to have set a red line was laughable if...

Quote: Originally Posted by fattytwobyfour This was floating around on FB today: I say we send them Justin Beiber, Miley Syrus and Hillary Clinton. I know I'd rather catch a live nuke myself.

I am beginning to think this is more about 0bama's ego than anything. There should be no strike unless there is another gas attack

I remember at the time nobody could explain how Iraq could have disposed of the weapons they had without there being some evidence of it. I always thought it was odd the Bush administration let that idea drop a little too easy. Perhaps they decided it was better to let them stay in Syria that...

If the reports are to be believed the Syrian government is moving it's scuds to locations not likely to be hit in any strikes we would make. If 0bama plans to act he needs to STFU and do it.

I really hope this is all saber rattling. If he launches an attack his approval rating will dive and he can kiss Democrat control of the Senate goodbye next year. As much as it would help politically from my perspective I really hope he has sense enough not to do it. It would be a monumental...

Obama stuck his foot in his mouth on this one and he's going to have to chew on shoe leather until Assad pushes things far enough the Arab league and UN take a stand, if ever. Unless he lets his arrogance get the best of him he wont do a unilateral strike.

Quote: Originally Posted by Bang Guy So your preference is to assist Al Qaeda. No sure bet they could gain control but what's the difference? Assad already openly supports terrorists which are all pretty much linked to some extent.

Assad is known to support terrorists, can't go wrong taking him out as far as I am concerned. If the military is flattened at least whoever comes out on top wont be a threat to any other countries there for a long time.

At this point the Arab league doesn't support military action. I say let em keep killing each other by whatever means until the region asks for our help. Obama never should have ran his mouth about the red line.

Quote: Originally Posted by Beth That argument worked for the porn industry. How so? Local governments have topless bar bans.

I am not sure you could make a case that not allowing a tattoo shop is a first amendment violation. Stupid in this day and age, yes. Now if you told people they couldn't have tats.......

Quote: Originally Posted by Darthtang AW Why now? Why not a year ago? Why not two years ago? If we interevene, what is the goal? What is the end game? Our political climate does not allow for our country to accomplish war related end game goals anymore. If we launch bombs and missles and syria...

If we do get involved it should be decisive. Lobbing a few missiles in there to make a point is just going to piss off both sides. 0bama found out the hard way that saber rattling only goes so far unless you cut someone on occasion.