ruaround
Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3132604
This has nothing to do with Cowboys and more to do with who is the better receiver as whole. I will argue Rice, Irvin, Carter, Swann, Monk, Largent and a slew of other receivers were more valuable to their team than Moss was and is. Thus making them better receivers as a whole.
agreed...
Moss' stats speak for themselves... but like Darth has stated the guy just isnt the "whole package"... if not for TO's antics and missing several games i would put him in a class above Moss... still would... L Fitz and Bolden are superior WRs than Moss... heck id even say Andre Johnson is too...
http:///forum/post/3132604
This has nothing to do with Cowboys and more to do with who is the better receiver as whole. I will argue Rice, Irvin, Carter, Swann, Monk, Largent and a slew of other receivers were more valuable to their team than Moss was and is. Thus making them better receivers as a whole.
agreed...
Moss' stats speak for themselves... but like Darth has stated the guy just isnt the "whole package"... if not for TO's antics and missing several games i would put him in a class above Moss... still would... L Fitz and Bolden are superior WRs than Moss... heck id even say Andre Johnson is too...