Originally Posted by
AquaKnight
http:///forum/post/2928544
No
. I can't imagine how else it would work. There are only 16 football games in a season, one game a week, and there's only one championship game, for a reason. The players need rest/conditioning time. And since's it's only one game, no way it could only be at the home at the better record team's home. You put the Superbowl where it's going to draw the most revenue for the NFL. Could you imagine people traveling to Buffalo, or Green Bay, or Minnesota this time of the year? It's the friggin SuperBowl, of course every player is going to play his heart out.
I'm not saying there is a better way. I'm just saying I'm not looking forward to this game as much as I was looking forward to the ravens and steelers. Or the iggles and the Giants. And that is usually the way I feel about these games. I also think that there isn't typically the history between the teams since they aren't in the same leagues playing eachother every year. So they don't play as dirty.
Although, a logistical and corporate nightmare, I'd sooooo be for GB playing a superbowl in Green Bay. Remember the Ice Bowl? IMO there is something about the snow falling the wind howling and it being so cold steam is coming off anything and playing football.