spsfreak100
Active Member
Originally posted by Jon-Paul
Okay
I'm wayyyy too tired to read this
Reading it would have answered every question. In fact, I'm sure it would take you around the same time to read this thread as it would to post that post
I also want to keep a clam in my tank (37 Gallon 4x75 watts VHO [8 watts per gallon]).
"Watts per gallon (w/g) is not a very good method of determining how much intensity you have to keep a clam. Following this "rule of thumb", 100 watts over a five-gallon tank (20wpg) appears much better than that same 100 watts over a ten-gallon tank (10wpg), but the intensity is lacking in both cases. One hundred watts is still one hundred watts, no matter how you slice it. Intensity is the key, not wattage. Eric Borneman Stated, 'if a coral, for example, requires 15,000 lux to saturate, it needs to get that amount of light regardless of tank size. So, if a 175 watt metal halide puts out 17,500 lux at the water surface and 8,000 lux ten inches down, it’s enough light for the coral at the surface but not at the bottom.'" 300wts of not enough to sustain a clam, no matter what size tank it's put under. We're still debating if 660wts is good enough for a clam. I wouldn't try a clam under only 300wts. If you wish to keep a clam, I would highly recommend halides.
#1 I'm not experienced enough
Then Wait...
One thing that troubles me SPSfreak100 is that you don't express as much zeal and protective prowess for your fellow humans as you do clams.
The subject was based on clams. I didn't want to get into the subject of starving children as that extremely off topic.
but like already mentioned our tanks our not the ocean and keeping any marine life at all is against nature since we cannot provide the most pristine conditions.
True, we usually cannot provide the exact conditions that the corals would be receiving in nature, but, we should try to mock their environment as best as possible.
Take Care,
Graham