Do you think your fish are happy?

noah's nemo

Member
read post 12 by flower,that about sums it up for me.Lets not over complicate this,if we really truly cared if they were happy and not how it makes us all warm and fuzzy to look at our tanks and gloat about the fish we keep,we'd leave them where they BELONG......
 

mrdc

Active Member
You should see my fish on open mic night...they look pretty happy or it's the vodka dosing.... not sure which.
 

scottnlisa

Member
I think all my fish are happy now. I just found one of my blue-green chromis's on the floor behind my tank. he is now a fish chip. He probably had some mental disorders. The funny part is there is only a space of 1" cut in the back bottom frame of my lid for wires and stuff. I wonder how many times it took him to hit the space.
 

ibanez

Member
I look at it like this. If I had the chance to live, fully self sustaining on 1000 acre ranch, never having a reason to leave and not have to worry about any predators setting foot in my 1000 acre plot, and even having a doctor to take care of my problems. I would take that option over occupying a small piece of land on the BIG BIG WORLD(fish eat fish) were I could go anywhere but could be killed(eaten by predators) or preyed upon at any given moment. I think fish begin to learn that they have no real threat in the tank and feel a sense of euphoria, thus happiness.
 

ibanez

Member
When it comes down to it, most fish probably don't stray far from their homes in the ocean. I doubt clown fish stray far from their anemone, I doubt jaw fish and gobies stray far from their little hole in the rock or sand. Have you ever heard the survival rate of most baby critters in the ocean. It is not so good.
 

noah's nemo

Member
I do agree with some of your points,but to compare 1000 acre ranch to a fish tank,i think its more like being locked in your house forever....
 

ibanez

Member
For a fish that migrates maybe, but most fish don't utilize more than a dozen acres in the ocean, so the size of our tank compared to an acre would be similar IMO to 1000 acres on planet earth. I am not talking about exact numbers, just the way I imagine it. At least I feel most of the fish in our aquariums occupy a small spot on the reef.
Also, if a fish moves, it is most likely in search of food, which they don't have to worry about in our tanks.
 

noah's nemo

Member
So is it your opinion we are doing our fish a favor?Don't get me wrong,i enjoy my tank like everyone else,but to me its self satisfing.
 

ibanez

Member
I think in some ways we might, maybe your fish would have been eaten 5 minutes after it was collected by a hungry moray eel, you did that fish a favor. I think the hobby in some ways hurts the fish by allowing certain species to be over collected, or collected by unethical means. It also hurts when people don't encourage research and preparation before purchasing equipment and animals in this hobby just to make an extra buck. Why put out a garbage line of product just to appeal to people who want to save money. It just puts animals in harms way. I could go on for hours about this. But I like to think I did my fish a favor.
 
R

rcreations

Guest
I ask myself that question all the time. Do my fish look happy? And I've gone through some selling and trading to get the right balance of fish that work with each other and now I think they all look happy. As happy as fish can be.
 

kacey

Member
Originally Posted by Cranberry
http:///forum/post/3252157
That is a reaction to a stimuli, not an emotion. Even a spider will run away from me if I tap his web. Fight or flight.
I don't think it requires emotions to avoid being eaten alive. They're not avoiding the emotional aspect but the stimuli of pain.
Our fish are never "happy" to see us. They see us as potential food every time we enter the room. They recognize the pattern. They are all a bunch of Pavlov's dogs tapping on the glass. When my scorps see me they light up like Christmas tress. It would be nice to think they are excited at my meer presence.... but it's a reaction to potential food.
I actually disagree. We always seem to consider emotion to be something belonging to 'higher' organisms. Things more evolved or things that behave in ways that let us easily assume an emotional, internal life. And yet, at the same time, we all acknowledge that emotions are, in their essence, irrational, illogical and primal. To me, it makes more sense that the majority of the world's creatures have emotion rather than some atonal capacity to reason out their own best interest. Evolution has shaped, for each organism, the things that frighten them, anger them, soothe them and make them, well, happy. By following these emotions, they make decisions that cause them to be successful at surviving and reproducing.
Emotion is an incredibly powerful motivator and it makes us do things that are in our own self interest. We run when frightened. We lash out when angry. We strive to maintain a status quo when that status quo brings us happiness. Emotion is an evolutionary tool. It keeps us alive and looking after ourselves. I think you absolutely need emotion to avoid being eaten alive. Fear is a survival mechanism. If something wants to eat you, the best way to avoid being eaten is to AUGH REALLY NOT WANT TO BE EATEN PANIC PANIC FLEE!
So, I think fish can feel emotions. I think they can be afraid, angry and happy. I think they can see you and be happy because you feed them and they like being fed and the association bleeds over into liking you around the tank. Clowns and other fish form lasting mating bonds. Is that love? Well, not in the sense that when one clownfish sees his mate he wants to go out and buy her mysis and a bouquet of amphipods. But, it just makes more sense to imagine that when mated clownfish interact, their little brains tell them over and over with chemicals 'this is good, you like this, this other fish near you makes you calm, content, safe' and the fish remain together because they WANT to, because evolution has found that wanting to remain with a single mate ends up being a very effective way to survive and propigate if you're a clownfish. To me, that makes more sense than assuming the clown has logicked out that staying with this bigger, bossier female will provide him with food and the potential for babies. I think logic, reason and forward planning are much more the domain of more complex creatures. I think emotions belong to nearly everything on some level, because it's such an incredibly useful and effective way to make an organism do things. It just makes sense, to me, that said tool started coming into play a long, long time ago with simple, little creatures rather than appearing only when more complicated animals began showing up.
So, are fish emotional landscapes as complex as humans? I'd guess probably not because their needs aren't as complex either. But can they feel emotions? Can they be happy? I believe they can.
 

cranberry

Active Member
To me, that all sounds nice.... but I don't believe it to be true and is an example of anthropomorphism, IMO. They are not driven by the will to be happy but the will to survive and thrive. What advantage does happiness give them. Fear, hunger, aggression give them the advantage to avoid dangerous things, look for food and compete for space food etc etc.
I believe their are higher cognitive emotions... like happiness. And then there are lower non-cognitive emotions, like stress and fear which one needs to survive.... these are what I think fish have.... put very basically, of course.
 

ibanez

Member
I like a lot of what you said. What I don't agree with is that of evolution, on a grand scale. The word creatures, comes from the word create. It is something that was created.
Who created them then? God? Yes, he created them, but for what purpose? Food? Not originally. Humans were to have the creation on the earth in subjection. So part of their existence is our enjoyment. Why would god create us? He must enjoy watching us interact and live our lives. Does he get enjoyment out of the way things are now? No, death and sickness and wickedness wasn't in his plan. That is another discussion for another day.
How do we get enjoyment out of creation? We enjoy watching them interact like god enjoys watching us interact. We enjoy their beauty and how no two animals act completely the same. So I feel that emotions in humans is a gift from god to enable us to enjoy things. Imagine if food had no taste, or there was no color, or everyone looked the same. If god wants us to enjoy life, don't you think he would want the same for all his creation? My son interrupted my thought half way through and I was really on a roll, so if it doesn't make sense, it's his fault.

I think by far we are the most complex of gods creations, but I think emotions are not unique to our species.
 

kacey

Member
Originally Posted by Cranberry
http:///forum/post/3252412
To me, that all sounds nice.... but I don't believe it to be true and is an example of anthropomorphism, IMO. They are not driven by the will to be happy but the will to survive and thrive. What advantage does happiness give them. Fear, hunger, aggression give them the advantage to avoid dangerous things, look for food and compete for space food etc etc.
I believe their are higher cognitive emotions... like happiness. And then there are lower non-cognitive emotions, like stress and fear which one needs to survive.... these are what I think fish have.... put very basically, of course.
I dunno, what advantage does happiness give us? ;)
I don't think they have complex thoughts about happiness or what it is or how to maintain it. But, I do think they have a state of being that feels better than other states of being, states of being that are in between the ideal and terror/misery and states of being that are lousy enough that they go belly up. I guess I just choose to call that top state happiness. I don't think it's the same as our happiness in that I believe it requires a lot less for a fish to achieve it than for a human to achieve it, but I think the idea is essentially the same. 'It feels best when I do this/go here/eat this. So, I will keep doing that.' It's just that in our case those things have to do with jobs, relationships, society, morality, etc. With a fish, it has to do with eating, boinking, pooping, sleeping and hiding. ;)
IbanEz, I agree. That is a very different debate for a different day. I respect that you believe in creation. I, personally, believe in evolution (though I also don't think the two needs be mutually exclusive).
 

ibanez

Member
I beleive in adaptation, and beleive that is also God given. But I feel that adaptation and evolution are two different concepts.
 

aquaknight

Active Member
Originally Posted by Kacey
http:///forum/post/3252418
I dunno, what advantage does happiness give us? ;)
What necessarily states that happiness has to be an advantage? Couldn't maybe happiness, actually hurt humans in the long run? Because when times are really good/happy, that just makes the bad times, that much worse. It's all great when everything is going great, but when the 'wheels come off,' people do some crazy things. Strictly from an evolutionary side, that trait in apes, a large male ape loses it, wipes out half his tribe. Because before he had it made, now in tough times, no food, rivals took over their area, etc....
 
Top