Actually, I read that many of them WERE hotter than halides, much to my surprise. (I mentioned/asked about that on a neighboring thread about halide heat, and Bang Guy confirmed it. Others subsequently confirmed it saying that heat is primarily a function of total wattage, not bulb type.
Also, when I referred to the heat, I wasn't talking about touching the bare bulbs, obviously. Like most folks, I know that touching lit bulbs is a bad idea. I was referring to the light housings, each of which is equipped with an internal fan because of the substantial heat problem. Even with the fans running (and NO canopy) the tops of the housings become VERY hot. I reasoned that they would become much hottER if they were stuck in a small, confined space and the efficacy of the fans was reduced. (The fans are mounted on the top of the almost-flat fixtures, so without the spacers they'd have to pull the hottest (highest) air through the very small creases along the top of hot fixture housing. I doubt they would be able to exchange cool air at all. I was convinced that such a mounting would dramatically reduce the cooling efficacy - and basically heat the air under the canopy.)
I don't know how many canopy lighting systems like this you have designed and built, but I'm interested in any alternative ideas you have to address the heat problem. It's a fairly small space to cram 1300+ watts of lighting into, and I couldn't think of a better way to facilitate the air circulation around the compacts AND the top and sides of the halide bulbs.
I don't even know if what I have conceived will be adequate, as the halides will not be here until the end of the week - but your confidence that what I have done is unnecessary overkill makes me feel better about it. :joy: I want to know that we can leave the house for a few days without worrying about the house burning down. :yes:
I you have descriptions/pictures of your designs that would be great, as I've got a few days to adjust before the big bulbs arrive.