first of all, ide like to say that i have become a much more knowledgable aquarists during the process of veiwing this forum's site, secondly, i'de like to thank all those who have given me their opinions and ways to improve a tank, and for the sake of knowledge and understanding, i would like to pose this quesiton, although i know that a mh or t5 light would be better for my tank, having already purchased the pc lighting, i would like anybody, especially pd (not to attack u, but because i feel like u have a lot of respect in dealing with anemone's) to explain to me how some light, is not light? what i mean is, an anemone is going to require a certain amount of lighting to survive and flourish, and although i now know that mh or t5 would be more sufficient for an anemone because they provide a higher lighting intensity in regards to the cone shape spreading of the actual light as opposed to the straight flouresent light of a pc, but, with the current pc that i have pushing 130 watts for a 29 gallon tank (4.48) watts per gallon, that LIGHT IS LIGHT, and with a depth of a 29 gallon tank, this light will be sufficient. my anemone is doing fine right now, mouth closed and showing improvments on color, (i bought him somewhat bleached, i didn't know much about anemone's until being introduced into this forum, again, thanks to all) but i feel like everybody has been way to biased in this whole lighting issue, comments, suggestions, reviews...?
ps, i would also like someone (again preferrebly pd to answer since he is so respected in the anemone world
to answer) what is an objective view point of why spot feeding is bad, is it bad only because it may be saying that the lighting is not as highly intense as it could b, or is it bad because of an actuall objective point of view, if the nutrition is giving the anemone everything that the light may not be supporting, and the anemone is doing great, what is the problem? thanks to all who have read my novel and i am looking forward to hearing responces!
