Gun bans dont work and here is an example

reefraff

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example#post_3506879
I understand. But once you pull that weapon, you are essentially taking the law into your own hands. The Walmart shooter becomes "the bad guy". What's the point in drawing your weapon if you don't plan to use it? If you're standing there weapon drawn, and this guy pops out and is pointing his gun at someone besides you, if you confront and act upon shooting the guy, you aren't protecting yourself, but his intended victim. Therefore, you now place yourself in the same position as that of a police officer. Unfortunately, the majority of CCW's don't have the mental capacity or proper training to handle these types of scenarios. You may well be proficient enough with your weapon to hit the assailant, but you also may hit another innocent victim in the process. What happens if you miss, and he starts firing back? Do you stand your ground and start unloading that 17-round clip (no telling where the bullets may go), do you run and hide, do you start retreating at the same time you're still shooting? Remember, we're not talking about home intrusion, or a one-on-one confrontation with a guy trying to rob you or break into your property. This is against some crazed nutjob that has one or more weapons, possibly bullet-proof armor, and absolutely no fear because his ultimate goal is to kill as many people possible before someone shoots him, or he simply shoots himself. This isn't standing there calm and complacent, shooting some paper target. This is intense pressure, you shooting at a living human being.
How often do you shoot your weapon? Once per week, once per month, every three months, longer? I'm usually pretty accurate with hitting center/close to center 90% with my 9mm. I've gone several months without shooting it, and when I do go back, my first 20-30 shots I'm hitting down and to the right of center (This is shooting at a paper target at 15 feet away). It's a fixed-sight weapon, so there's no site adjustments that can get knocked off. It's just from improper stance, holding of the gun, and probably my mis-judging of distances as I've gotten older. If I was carrying my gun and had a confrontation similar to the Walmart scenario, I'd probably say that I would have a good chance of completely missing my target, especially if this guy was further than 15 feet away. It's not just because I'm facing this adrenaline rush having the thought of shooting a person who is most likely shooting at me, it's because my skills are simply not proficent enough to handle the situation. This is what you face with 95% of concealed carriers. I have friends who have CHL's, and they tell me that they probably only shoot once per month, if that. They say it's due to lack of time, having to drive out to the firing range (the majority of ranges in the SA area are at least 30 - 45 minutes from my home), and also cost of ammo ($15 - $18 for a box of 50 rounds, if not higher). So again, unless your skills are honed, and you practice firing your weapon on a consistent basis, then all you have is a false sense of security hidden under your jacket.
I'd bet the person being drawn down on would be thankful there was someone there with a gun.
 

reefraff

Active Member
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/woman-hiding-kids-shoots-intruder/nTm7s/
The only thing that didn't go according to plan here is the waste of skin survived.
 

reefraff

Active Member
I dunno. I use to work with a guy who got shotgunned in the face climbing in someone's window. It made him reassess the direction of his life.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3506914
What good would it do if he couldn't hit him in the first place. You'd probably end up with two dead instead of one.
I am not aware of a state that doesn't require training to get a CCW. Incidents of a CCW holder involved in a accidental shooting are so rare I don't see it as a problem. The good is far overwhelming any bad that might come from it.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3506941
I am not aware of a state that doesn't require training to get a CCW. Incidents of a CCW holder involved in a accidental shooting are so rare I don't see it as a problem. The good is far overwhelming any bad that might come from it.
The CHL requirement in Texas is 11 hours classroom, and two hours firing on the range. I believe you have to be within the first two "rings" of the center of the target in order to pass the "shooting" requirement of the certification. The problem is, the majority of the people that get their CCW don't keep up with their skills. They probably go to the range a couple times per month at first, but then it changes to one per month, then once every 3 months, etc. You can't draw your weapon and simply expect that is enough of a deterrent for your assialant to just turn and run tail. If you pull it, you have to be prepared to use it. If you forget how to take the safety off, or can't hit the broad side of a barn for 30 feet away, then all that's going to happen is you're likely to get yourself killed if the assailant is shoting back.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3506945
The CHL requirement in Texas is 11 hours classroom, and two hours firing on the range. I believe you have to be within the first two "rings" of the center of the target in order to pass the "shooting" requirement of the certification. The problem is, the majority of the people that get their CCW don't keep up with their skills. They probably go to the range a couple times per month at first, but then it changes to one per month, then once every 3 months, etc. You can't draw your weapon and simply expect that is enough of a deterrent for your assialant to just turn and run tail. If you pull it, you have to be prepared to use it. If you forget how to take the safety off, or can't hit the broad side of a barn for 30 feet away, then all that's going to happen is you're likely to get yourself killed if the assailant is shoting back.
Well like I said it OBVIOUSLY isn't an issue because there are very few incidents of CCW folks foolishly firing their guns, The Oregon mall shooting was the latest example of clear thinking by a CCW holder. If gun owners were the reactionary incompetents you liberals try to paint us as there would be daily stories of shootings by law abiding gun owners. The facts never seem to come close to your rhetoric.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3506951
Well like I said it OBVIOUSLY isn't an issue because there are very few incidents of CCW folks foolishly firing their guns, The Oregon mall shooting was the latest example of clear thinking by a CCW holder. If gun owners were the reactionary incompetents you liberals try to paint us as there would be daily stories of shootings by law abiding gun owners. The facts never seem to come close to your rhetoric.
There's news stories of random and deliberate gun shootings every day across the country. We seem to get some type of gun shooting around here at least 3 times per month, if not more. There was one not too long ago where a few people got into some argument in a bar, they all got tossed out, one guy walked over to his car, grabbed his gun and started shooting. There's an article in today's paper that's discussing some new legal ranglings about taking weapons from people who have a known history of violence. This came about after this guy got into an argument with his girlfriend, she got a restraining order, he came over to her house, she came out to confront him, he drags her by the hair back into the house and shoots her dead. He ended up getting killed while on the run. Were these people "law abiding gun owners" before they committed these crimes?
 

reefraff

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3506974
There's news stories of random and deliberate gun shootings every day across the country. We seem to get some type of gun shooting around here at least 3 times per month, if not more. There was one not too long ago where a few people got into some argument in a bar, they all got tossed out, one guy walked over to his car, grabbed his gun and started shooting. There's an article in today's paper that's discussing some new legal ranglings about taking weapons from people who have a known history of violence. This came about after this guy got into an argument with his girlfriend, she got a restraining order, he came over to her house, she came out to confront him, he drags her by the hair back into the house and shoots her dead. He ended up getting killed while on the run. Were these people "law abiding gun owners" before they committed these crimes?
Where's the news reports of "Another concealed carry holder shoots bystander"? The media would eat it up with a fork. You don't see them because they are quite rare.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3506977
Where's the news reports of "Another concealed carry holder shoots bystander"? The media would eat it up with a fork. You don't see them because they are quite rare.
That's because half of these shooting incidents the shooters disappear before the cops get there. Our local news only reports the basics of a shooting event. They don't go digging into the details of every single shooting incident to see who the shooter was, what their criminal background is, whether they legally owned a gun, or if the had a CCW license. It's interesting the only time you do hear about incidents with CCW's is the "feel good" stories where they shoot the bad guy. When it's turned around, they remain eerily silent. Do you honestly think that every single person that's obtain a CCW is a "true to honest, law abiding gun owner that would never use their weapon in a malicious manner"? Look up the statistics of gun ownership and the number of CHL's issued, then look at the number of gun incidents in a criminal manner. There's too many CHL's out there where some illegal gun crime hasn't occurred. If you don't believe that, you're doing nothingg but drinking the NRA Kool-Aide.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
That's because half of these shooting incidents the shooters disappear before the cops get there.  Our local news only reports the basics of a shooting event.  They don't go digging into the details of every single shooting incident to see who the shooter was, what their criminal background is, whether they legally owned a gun, or if the had a CCW license.  It's interesting the only time you do hear about incidents with CCW's is the "feel good" stories where they shoot the bad guy.  When it's turned around, they remain eerily silent.  Do you honestly think that every single person that's obtain a CCW is a "true to honest, law abiding gun owner that would never use their weapon in a malicious manner"?  Look up the statistics of gun ownership and the number of CHL's issued, then look at the number of gun incidents in a criminal manner.  There's too many CHL's out there where some illegal gun crime hasn't occurred.  If you don't believe that, you're doing nothingg but drinking the NRA Kool-Aide.
That is a load a crap. I read a story several months ago of a CCW firing into someones car that "threatened" him verbally. He was arrested and charged. The news media jumps all over every gun story, especially if it goes bad!
 

reefraff

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3507020
That's because half of these shooting incidents the shooters disappear before the cops get there. Our local news only reports the basics of a shooting event. They don't go digging into the details of every single shooting incident to see who the shooter was, what their criminal background is, whether they legally owned a gun, or if the had a CCW license. It's interesting the only time you do hear about incidents with CCW's is the "feel good" stories where they shoot the bad guy. When it's turned around, they remain eerily silent. Do you honestly think that every single person that's obtain a CCW is a "true to honest, law abiding gun owner that would never use their weapon in a malicious manner"? Look up the statistics of gun ownership and the number of CHL's issued, then look at the number of gun incidents in a criminal manner. There's too many CHL's out there where some illegal gun crime hasn't occurred. If you don't believe that, you're doing nothingg but drinking the NRA Kool-Aide.
So then the CCW holders are all just smarter than the cops?
And yes, I think the overwhelming majority of people who go through the hoops to legally carry a concealed weapon are upstanding citizens who would never think of breaking the law. Why else would they follow the rules when they could just as easy carry concealed anyway? Is common sense a foreign concept to you?
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3507045
So then the CCW holders are all just smarter than the cops?
And yes, I think the overwhelming majority of people who go through the hoops to legally carry a concealed weapon are upstanding citizens who would never think of breaking the law. Why else would they follow the rules when they could just as easy carry concealed anyway? Is common sense a foreign concept to you?
Agree!!!!!
 

acrylic51

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/394041/gun-bans-dont-work-and-here-is-an-example/20#post_3507020
That's because half of these shooting incidents the shooters disappear before the cops get there. Our local news only reports the basics of a shooting event. They don't go digging into the details of every single shooting incident to see who the shooter was, what their criminal background is, whether they legally owned a gun, or if the had a CCW license. It's interesting the only time you do hear about incidents with CCW's is the "feel good" stories where they shoot the bad guy. When it's turned around, they remain eerily silent. Do you honestly think that every single person that's obtain a CCW is a "true to honest, law abiding gun owner that would never use their weapon in a malicious manner"? Look up the statistics of gun ownership and the number of CHL's issued, then look at the number of gun incidents in a criminal manner. There's too many CHL's out there where some illegal gun crime hasn't occurred. If you don't believe that, you're doing nothingg but drinking the NRA Kool-Aide.
That's is another "goofy" statement made.....They were "law abiding" enough to follow the rules and procedures to get the CCW....and looking through your glasses it appears that your the "only" honest, logical, rational human being.....I guess everyone else is just crazy for wanting to be able to protect themselves.....In my eyes just because I carry, I'm not out looking to be "Captain America" and save the world as you paint CCW's.....I'm sure most others would agree as well.
 
Top