Maybe they don't love the annointed one everywhere...

groupergenius

groupergenius

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092393
Why shouldn't I try to back our current President? At least I have an open mind about his proposals and visions. You people only see a Democrat, and you automatically become the three monkeys, Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil.

My nitrates are high, how can I bring them down?
Contribute. And "Be Honest".
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by GrouperGenius
http:///forum/post/3092396
Hmmm. I see you figured out 3/20 of the media outlets. Grow up.
Apparently those are the only three media outlets you watch. Why don't you spend less time finding faults with Obama, and find ways to fix the problems?
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by GrouperGenius
http:///forum/post/3092399
My nitrates are high, how can I bring them down?
Contribute. And "Be Honest".
Worrying about high nitrates eh? And exactly what does that have to do with my last statement? Oh, that's right. You can't come back with a logical reply to refute it.
 
groupergenius

groupergenius

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092402
Why don't you spend less time finding faults with Obama, and find ways to fix the problems?

Dude...Dudette...whatever. Keep your undies on. How can I get this through your skull.
I'M TALKING ABOUT THE MEDIA!!!!!!
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by GrouperGenius
http:///forum/post/3092407
Dude...Dudette...whatever. Keep your undies on. How can I get this through your skull.
I'M TALKING ABOUT THE MEDIA!!!!!!
No, You're using the media excuse to bash Obama!!!!
 
groupergenius

groupergenius

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092404
Worrying about high nitrates eh? And exactly what does that have to do with my last statement? Oh, that's right. You can't come back with a logical reply to refute it.


Just making a point. And your doing a better job of it than I ever could. Thanks.
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
If you were honestly concerned with ANY media coverage, why is it you're keying on how Obama is viewed? Bush was in office for 8 years. Obama has been in office for 6 MONTHS. How much coverage is he supposed to get? How many trips out of the country has he made since being in office? How many endless gaffs and blunders did ALL the media outlets show of Obama, Palin, and McCain during a year and a half of campaigning? You people complain the guy in on televison TOO much. Now you're whining he's not on enough, at least not all the bad media coverage. Don't worry. If he does end up serving two terms, every media outlet will have plenty of time to find the flaws you want ot see.
 
groupergenius

groupergenius

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092414
If you were honestly concerned with ANY media coverage, why is it you're keying on how Obama is viewed? Bush was in office for 8 years. Obama has been in office for 6 MONTHS. How much coverage is he supposed to get? How many trips out of the country has he made since being in office? How many endless gaffs and blunders did ALL the media outlets show of Obama, Palin, and McCain during a year and a half of campaigning? You people complain the guy in on televison TOO much. Now you're whining he's not on enough, at least not all the bad media coverage. Don't worry. If he does end up serving two terms, every media outlet will have plenty of time to find the flaws you want ot see.

You are digging your own hole deeper, but you don't even realize it. You really have missed the point of my OP and I am done trying to explain it to you.
Take the rose colored glasses off and slip on the Gray ones.
 
T

tizzo

Guest
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092393
Why shouldn't I try to back our current President? At least I have an open mind about his proposals and visions. You people only see a Democrat, and you automatically become the three monkeys, Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil.
Backing? No. I believe even HE would see the point here.
And...
You people
?? You are referencing My quote in this response, but I challenge you to dig and read every post I've ever posted and SEE if you can guess which party I am! I don't take dem/ rep sides. When it comes to a certain point, I evaluate it and decide my perspective on my own. I don't need a party for that.
So, before you make yourself look like an idiot with assumptions, you should maybe learn my side before you try to use it against me...
But you won't. Cause it's not your business...
Nor the republicans.
 
T

tizzo

Guest
Originally Posted by GrouperGenius
http:///forum/post/3092418
You are digging your own hole deeper, but you don't even realize it. You really have missed the point of my OP and I am done trying to explain it to you.
.

He will not see the point because he's trying to hard to make his own.

Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.
FWIW GG, I totally got your point!
But since this is gonna somehow turn into a political argument, I will do what I always do with politics and ignore it.
 
groupergenius

groupergenius

Active Member
Originally Posted by Tizzo
http:///forum/post/3092445
He will not see the point because he's trying to hard to make his own.

Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.
FWIW GG, I totally got your point!
But since this is gonna somehow turn into a political argument, I will do what I always do with politics and ignore it.


Is that an espresso?? Yummy.
 
socal57che

socal57che

Active Member
I don't have TV, so I think I'll follow the link to see what this is all about. I already know that the media is democratically biased. They are owned by people and people have opinions. These opinions come out through the company they own. If I owned a newspaper or radio station, I would censor what the people reading or listening hear and see. Anybody that claims they wouldn't is a liar. I would hire likeminded people to push my agenda. That's the way it works. It just so happens that many media outlets are owned and operated by liberals.
Now, when is Mr. Hannity going to post? %%
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by GrouperGenius
http:///forum/post/3092418
You are digging your own hole deeper, but you don't even realize it. You really have missed the point of my OP and I am done trying to explain it to you.
Take the rose colored glasses off and slip on the Gray ones.
The problem is, you made no point. You throw out two YouTube snipets of Obama apparently being snubbed by foreign dignitaries. Then you go off on some tangent about how the major media outlets don't put Obama in a bad light as much as they did GW. If it isn't about bashing Obama, then why the reference Obama as The Golden Boy and The Annointed One? If it's about media bias, why did you name the thread, "Maybe they don't love the annointed one everywhere... ". Where does that statement imply the topic is about media bias? Like I said, in case you can't read, OBAMA HASN'T BEEN IN OFFICE LONG ENOUGH TO GET BASHED BY THE MEDIA. What point are you missing?
 
reefraff

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092339
It happened to Dubya so often, people got tired of seeing it.

If you people spent the same amount of energy you do bashing Obama's every move, and contact your representatives and providing them with your infinite wisdom on how to fix all the problems in this country, we'd all be dancing in the streets tomorrow.
Guess you haven't noticed the moving poll numbers and the blue dogs suddenly finding a backbone.
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by socal57che
http:///forum/post/3092456
I don't have TV, so I think I'll follow the link to see what this is all about. I already know that the media is democratically biased. They are owned by people and people have opinions. These opinions come out through the company they own. If I owned a newspaper or radio station, I would censor what the people reading or listening hear and see. Anybody that claims they wouldn't is a liar. I would hire likeminded people to push my agenda. That's the way it works. It just so happens that many media outlets are owned and operated by liberals.
Now, when is Mr. Hannity going to post?


Not in my neighborhood. The local newspaper reeks conservative views. The Editorial page comments are probably 5 to 1 in favor of the conservative opnions. They made the Doonesbury comic so small, you need a magnifying glass to read it, while Mallard Filmore is twice the size.
 
T

tizzo

Guest
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3092474
Not in my neighborhood. The local newspaper reeks conservative views. The Editorial page comments are probably 5 to 1 in favor of the conservative opnions. They made the Doonesbury comic so small, you need a magnifying glass to read it, while Mallard Filmore is twice the size.
Which is your local newspaper I'd like to see it online and determine if it's you seeing what you wanna see or if it really is biased...
 
socal57che

socal57che

Active Member
Originally Posted by Coral Keeper
http:///forum/post/3092465
+1 I have a Television, but not the TV channels.
Same here, actually. It's just hard for people to understand that we have a tv, but no outside influence. No antenna, no cable, no dish... People have a hard time comprehending that, so I just say we have no tv.
Freedom from television is very liberating.
I watched the videos and I can tell you that GW would have caught holy he-double hockey sticks over something like that, but to happen twice with no coverage by major media?????? You have to be drowning in KoolAid not to see that.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top