The debate goes on- Last post for me on this topic so suffice to say :
Tanks set up with live rock and a sand bed, skimmer etc. One intended to be reef and the other to be FOWLR. The differance thereafter is the husbandry practices in each. The reef tank you now your corals and inverts are more intolerant of nitrates so you don't overfeed, you don't overload load with fish, you export nutrients with water changes andpossible harvesting algae. In the FOWLR system the sand and live rock are there to process the nitrogen just like in a reef tank, but then we say "nitrates are okay". Is the biology of the system any differant? NOPE. Are the husbandry practices any differant - HELL YES! The FOWLR was not intended to be a reef so pristine conditions are not as important - the husbandry practices there for change - more stock, more food, less maintainance, etc. IE nitrate level above zero existing
and for that system or that person it is OKAY. JUST don't say a system can't or rrarely achieve zero nitrates - becuase they can and do more often than not when you don't overload the systems biological ability to break down wastes. Keeping a fish tank is a lesson in waste water treatement -
fish do @#$% and @#$% happens is a reality so you have do either deal with it or simply say 10 ppm is OKAY! The choice is yours. So for me end of debate - each fish keeper has to decide what husbandry practices are for them and which are not. As far as stating where facts come from try this -
Limnology and Icthyology degrees, along with current works by Hargreaves, Paletta, Dakin, Calfo, Fenner, Borneman, Tullock, et al. and more! When I took the plunge from fresh to salt I researched alot to learn before I made mistakes that kill live stuff!