aquaknight
Active Member
Originally Posted by KingSmith
http:///forum/post/2828301
Then by that logic if hetrosexuals can break the rules of marriage what does it matter if a homosexual does? Wait I know lets continue to keep people repressed so they are forced to pretend they are strait and further make a mockery of the so called sacred sacrement of marriage.
Prediction: in its continued effort to compromise it values to bring in more members and stay profitable major religous groups will change their stance on Gay being immoral. certaintly would not be the first time
No one that advocating that it's okay for heterosexuals to break rules/traditions of marriage. The statics regarding marriage are indeed saddening. But by saying that the majority of marriage end early, etc, is of very poor reason for allowing gay marriage. It falls back to the old schoolyard saying, "Well Timmy jumped off a bridge, Timmy threw rocks at cars and didn't get in trouble, etc...Why can't I?" Just because someone else does it, doesn't make it okay. Just because an area is very riddled with crime, does the police force give up in that area?
No one is also advocating to repress them either. I am all for equal rights in regards to civil unions. The term 'marriage' is indeed causing a lot of problems. As said before, everyone was under the impression that marriage(as in the ceramony) and religion was of little importance to gay couples. Yet, when California briefly lifted the ban, what did they all do? Go throw a bunch of mock weddings.
http:///forum/post/2828301
Then by that logic if hetrosexuals can break the rules of marriage what does it matter if a homosexual does? Wait I know lets continue to keep people repressed so they are forced to pretend they are strait and further make a mockery of the so called sacred sacrement of marriage.
Prediction: in its continued effort to compromise it values to bring in more members and stay profitable major religous groups will change their stance on Gay being immoral. certaintly would not be the first time
No one that advocating that it's okay for heterosexuals to break rules/traditions of marriage. The statics regarding marriage are indeed saddening. But by saying that the majority of marriage end early, etc, is of very poor reason for allowing gay marriage. It falls back to the old schoolyard saying, "Well Timmy jumped off a bridge, Timmy threw rocks at cars and didn't get in trouble, etc...Why can't I?" Just because someone else does it, doesn't make it okay. Just because an area is very riddled with crime, does the police force give up in that area?
No one is also advocating to repress them either. I am all for equal rights in regards to civil unions. The term 'marriage' is indeed causing a lot of problems. As said before, everyone was under the impression that marriage(as in the ceramony) and religion was of little importance to gay couples. Yet, when California briefly lifted the ban, what did they all do? Go throw a bunch of mock weddings.