t316- mancard violation

crimzy

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2881367
@whomever recommended crimzy I call foul...he is a better lawyer than judge. He may be used as counsel, but until the man forum here at SWF.com elects a judge you are subject to the rulings of some of us that have been here longer....sucks, I know, but deal with it....like a man.
Sorry bud... check our dates. I got the seniority here pal. And don't try to pull that "I used to have another name" crap with me cause lots of us have had swf alter egos in the past. But I have no problem sitting on the panel with other experts.
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/2881203
This thread is still going....

So what was my verdict? Am I allowed to keep the dog until after the Holidays.....


Originally Posted by T316

http:///forum/post/2881452
Well then, I appeal. I'll need a lawyer. Crimzy, you available? Do you handle ManCard cases? In the meantime, I consider myself out on bail, so I keep the dog until the case goes back before the Court of Appeals...

T316, you're in a tough spot here. The current avatar is a loser. I hate to tell you the bad news but if you take that case to trial, the jury will fry you. On the other hand, if you succomb to the pressure and change it now, you show weakness and lose your credibility. If it was me, I'd take the man suspension and join the girls team for a while. They love the cute crap and there are some benefits to that side.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by crimzy
http:///forum/post/2881507
Sorry bud... check our dates. I got the seniority here pal. And don't try to pull that "I used to have another name" crap with me cause lots of us have had swf alter egos in the past. But I have no problem sitting on the panel with other experts.

not another name, just an extension, check the date for darthtang. I could go old school with the name before that, but that would be girlie of me...so I only present names that can be valid...whom else would choose darthtang? But I concur, you are definitely on the panel....
we really need to get this panel and judge thing sorted out...
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
and crimzy I can prove that was me, because one of the resident members gave me the avatar still used by the old name......He can come to my defense. but this does not matter, better stop before I start sounding like a girl.
 

crimzy

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2881518
and crimzy I can prove that was me, because one of the resident members gave me the avatar still used by the old name......He can come to my defense. but this does not matter, better stop before I start sounding like a girl.
It's all right, sweetie... don't get your panties in a bunch. I believe you. And I remember the old Darth. Too bad I had to kill him.
 

ruaround

Active Member
Originally Posted by renogaw
http:///forum/post/2881217
no, it's super squirrel... much mightier than super man :)
some of these pics are quite distrurbing hehe
nah i was thinkin of the supertard...
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/2881234
look at the participants on this thread....We are dealing with 'disturbing' people here reno...

HEY... i resemble that remark!!!

Originally Posted by Darthtang AW

http:///forum/post/2881367
@whomever recommended crimzy I call foul...he is a better lawyer than judge. He may be used as counsel, but until the man forum here at SWF.com elects a judge you are subject to the rulings of some of us that have been here longer....sucks, I know, but deal with it....like a man.
All other whining will be directed to the tamponsRus.com, or freecarebearsunite.com.
.
hmmm... i wonder whom that would be...
Originally Posted by crimzy

http:///forum/post/2881507
Sorry bud... check our dates. I got the seniority here pal. And don't try to pull that "I used to have another name" crap with me cause lots of us have had swf alter egos in the past. But I have no problem sitting on the panel with other experts.
yup... check em...
::cough OH hmh TWO cough::
 

shogun323

Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/2881353
I am yet to find a better quality than Beretta.
Seriously? Have you shot many other types of pistols? For instance, the Springfiled Armory XD series.
I've shot the Barreta 92 as well as the P4 Storm and didn't care for them at all.
Kimber 1911's are the shizzzzz. I love mine.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by shogun323
http:///forum/post/2881600
Seriously? Have you shot many other types of pistols? For instance, the Springfiled Armory XD series.
Kimber 1911's are the shizzzzz. I love mine.
I have to agree berettas are nice. But there are other better guns. I'm a big fan of 1911's. I don't like the XD series that much as a plunker. But they are great work guns. And a springfield 1911 is great.
But if you've never held and shot a Kimber you've never held or shot a gun. That is almost as good as ---. They are more of a custom gun maker. Like driving a king ranch f-250 vs just a plain one.
 

t316

Active Member
Well, like I said, I have never shot a Kimber, don't even know of any friends that have one, so I'm not talking negative about it, but I do love my Beretta.
It appears that I am in a tight jam. I will succomb to the admission that my dog pic "might" not be the manliest of mancard avatar's, however it appears that there is not even an organized panel yet who can make the judgement. But I'm not usually a conformist to pressure, so I reject the notion of dog pic removal until at least after Christmas day. So, technically, maybe I am on temporary "suspension", but I should make another selection and have it up soon.....
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by crimzy
http:///forum/post/2881507
T316, you're in a tough spot here. The current avatar is a loser. I hate to tell you the bad news but if you take that case to trial, the jury will fry you. On the other hand, if you succomb to the pressure and change it now, you show weakness and lose your credibility. If it was me, I'd take the man suspension and join the girls team for a while. They love the cute crap and there are some benefits to that side.

You have major problems and shouldn't take this losing case. You could argue that it is ok to post pictures of you dog as an avatar. However it isn't acceptable to take your dog to the studio to get his pictures done.
If it isn't his dog, then he had to go google "cute puppy photos" and that in and of itself is disturbing. Then he had to choose the "cutest" and post it. These are serious problems.
 

reefkprz

Active Member
Originally Posted by Coral Keeper
http:///forum/post/2881009
This avatar is for you RU!!

I love the fact that not only is he in no sense of the word anywhere near in the right physical condition to wear that costume but you can see the girdle LOL
 

robertmathern

Active Member
stdreb27 right on the money. There is no chance for T316 to come out of this one. And now that I think about it thats is disturbing to go out of your way to violate the man laws
 

coral keeper

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2881518
and crimzy I can prove that was me, because one of the resident members gave me the avatar still used by the old name......He can come to my defense. but this does not matter, better stop before I start sounding like a girl.
Uh oh!! Man card police is here!
 

bigarn

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2881518
and crimzy I can prove that was me, because one of the resident members gave me the avatar still used by the old name......He can come to my defense. but this does not matter, better stop before I start sounding like a girl.
What Darth says is true .... I remember, and I can be bought...
 

jpc763

Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/2881799
Well, like I said, I have never shot a Kimber, don't even know of any friends that have one, so I'm not talking negative about it, but I do love my Beretta.
It appears that I am in a tight jam. I will succomb to the admission that my dog pic "might" not be the manliest of mancard avatar's, however it appears that there is not even an organized panel yet who can make the judgement. But I'm not usually a conformist to pressure, so I reject the notion of dog pic removal until at least after Christmas day. So, technically, maybe I am on temporary "suspension", but I should make another selection and have it up soon.....
I suggest an avatar or a bikini clad women (hot of course) holding a puppy with one or the other wearing a Santa hat. That way you get to keep your card and your puppy!
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2882053
You have major problems and shouldn't take this losing case. You could argue that it is ok to post pictures of you dog as an avatar. However it isn't acceptable to take your dog to the studio to get his pictures done.
If it isn't his dog, then he had to go google "cute puppy photos" and that in and of itself is disturbing. Then he had to choose the "cutest" and post it. These are serious problems.

You have very valid points. But I was looking at the rule book and section 21c, paragraph f, line 3 directly states, if any said "cute" action by any man results in a date, or the opposite S-E-X croning over said individual because of it, this will not be a man card violation. As long as the man in question "seals the deal"...
If the "deal is sealed", our man lawyer would have to determine if maintaining an avatar is truly an "action".
 

crimzy

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2882124
You have very valid points. But I was looking at the rule book and section 21c, paragraph f, line 3 directly states, if any said "cute" action by any man results in a date, or the opposite S-E-X croning over said individual because of it, this will not be a man card violation. As long as the man in question "seals the deal"...
If the "deal is sealed", our man lawyer would have to determine if maintaining an avatar is truly an "action".
Aaah yes... the catch-all mancard defense. So the issue remains, is T316 man enough to let out his inner dog and use the cuteness to get himself some tail?
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Photographic or video evidence of sealed dealed must be brought forth with as the evidence or no less than 3 eyewitnesses of impecable character must confirm.
 

t316

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2882124
You have very valid points. But I was looking at the rule book and section 21c, paragraph f, line 3 directly states, if any said "cute" action by any man results in a date, or the opposite S-E-X croning over said individual because of it, this will not be a man card violation. As long as the man in question "seals the deal"...
If the "deal is sealed", our man lawyer would have to determine if maintaining an avatar is truly an "action".
There you go, that is my defense...

Check all of the threads I have been in. I have had numerous chick responses related to the puppy. As far as rule book section 21c, paragraph f, line 3 requirement that I "seal the deal", well, my WIFE thought the puppy was cute too, and I can attest that I have "sealed the deal"...

So since the deal has been sealed, I will peel the puppy pic, by Christmas night, and replace with more manly depiction for further review.
 
Top