yearofthenick
Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
Was it only 5-10 million years? I thought it was 50 to 80.
Actually, the Cambrian Explosion Period was estimated to be 50 million years, but in that time, some of the organisms formed in as little as 3-5 million years... according to Wikipedia.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
Irregardless, just think how much time that is. Look how fast a single cell in your body reproduces on a daily basis. You're saying that a simple organism couldn't evolve into a complex organism in that amount of time without the assistance of a higher being? As I stated before, carbon dating and determining the exact age of something isn't perfect. Don't know the exact figure, but I would be willing to guess at least a 10% margin of error. Even more the farther back you go. These Cambrian organisms could have come to being in a totally different period.
Dude, we're talking about creation, not replication. Yes, our cells are constantly replicating, but that's no surprise. Our entire human race is replicating (offspring) as a normal way of life. It's the CREATION of these organisms that is hard to believe. To make something out of something identical to it is common knowledge - we can do that. But to make something out of nothing - that's a whole different story. They're two completely separate arguments altogether.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
However, scientist at least have something to test. What do the theologeans have to test God exists?
It's not so much about testing as it is interpreting. Theologians have a massive amount of text (e.g. 24,000 pieces of NT stuff) and it's all about trying to translate it, understand where/how/why it was written. It's also something we would have loved to be physically present for as it was taking place.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
They may have physical proof Jesus did in fact live.
I don't know if we have any physical proof of Jesus' life, aside from the texts. I mean, you can go to any flea market and get "the sword that pierced Jesus' side!!!" for $15, but as for actual physical evidence, aside from the text, we have none. But the same is true about a lot of historical figures.. Alexander the Great, being one of them.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
But what proof do they have to validate who they say he was? The bible says he 'walked on water', 'turned water into wine', 'fed thousands with one loaf of bread'. Those same events have been recreated by magicians in present time. Whose to say Jesus was just a common man that used magic tricks to get his message across about his faith? He attributed talking to his Father by believing the voices he heard in his head were Him speaking. Sounds far-fetched? Maybe. But it's not out of the realm of possibility.
I would LOVE to see a magician feed 5,000 people on a few loaves of bread. We'd be able to solve the world hunger crisis. The truth is that NO magician has done that. Plus, Jesus wasn't on a stage with tons of bags of broken pieces of bread hidden behind the curtains. He was in the friggin desert when that happened.... AND Jesus never had any actual possessions. Just like you can tell the real from the fake today, I am sure they could tell the real from the fake in their times. I know that magicians walk on water by having reinforced glass just beneath the water level... but that would be a pretty elaborate thing in 15 A.D. Plus, it was in the midst of a storm when Jesus did that, and the story says that Jesus ALSO calmed the storm. You'd need a lot of industrial fans and rain-makers, which also didn't exist in that time.
The truth is that if Jesus WERE a magician, he'd blow everyone away even with today's standards. Stuff happened in the times that just simply were not possible to be made by man.
http:///forum/post/3018167
Was it only 5-10 million years? I thought it was 50 to 80.
Actually, the Cambrian Explosion Period was estimated to be 50 million years, but in that time, some of the organisms formed in as little as 3-5 million years... according to Wikipedia.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
Irregardless, just think how much time that is. Look how fast a single cell in your body reproduces on a daily basis. You're saying that a simple organism couldn't evolve into a complex organism in that amount of time without the assistance of a higher being? As I stated before, carbon dating and determining the exact age of something isn't perfect. Don't know the exact figure, but I would be willing to guess at least a 10% margin of error. Even more the farther back you go. These Cambrian organisms could have come to being in a totally different period.
Dude, we're talking about creation, not replication. Yes, our cells are constantly replicating, but that's no surprise. Our entire human race is replicating (offspring) as a normal way of life. It's the CREATION of these organisms that is hard to believe. To make something out of something identical to it is common knowledge - we can do that. But to make something out of nothing - that's a whole different story. They're two completely separate arguments altogether.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
However, scientist at least have something to test. What do the theologeans have to test God exists?
It's not so much about testing as it is interpreting. Theologians have a massive amount of text (e.g. 24,000 pieces of NT stuff) and it's all about trying to translate it, understand where/how/why it was written. It's also something we would have loved to be physically present for as it was taking place.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
They may have physical proof Jesus did in fact live.
I don't know if we have any physical proof of Jesus' life, aside from the texts. I mean, you can go to any flea market and get "the sword that pierced Jesus' side!!!" for $15, but as for actual physical evidence, aside from the text, we have none. But the same is true about a lot of historical figures.. Alexander the Great, being one of them.
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3018167
But what proof do they have to validate who they say he was? The bible says he 'walked on water', 'turned water into wine', 'fed thousands with one loaf of bread'. Those same events have been recreated by magicians in present time. Whose to say Jesus was just a common man that used magic tricks to get his message across about his faith? He attributed talking to his Father by believing the voices he heard in his head were Him speaking. Sounds far-fetched? Maybe. But it's not out of the realm of possibility.
I would LOVE to see a magician feed 5,000 people on a few loaves of bread. We'd be able to solve the world hunger crisis. The truth is that NO magician has done that. Plus, Jesus wasn't on a stage with tons of bags of broken pieces of bread hidden behind the curtains. He was in the friggin desert when that happened.... AND Jesus never had any actual possessions. Just like you can tell the real from the fake today, I am sure they could tell the real from the fake in their times. I know that magicians walk on water by having reinforced glass just beneath the water level... but that would be a pretty elaborate thing in 15 A.D. Plus, it was in the midst of a storm when Jesus did that, and the story says that Jesus ALSO calmed the storm. You'd need a lot of industrial fans and rain-makers, which also didn't exist in that time.
The truth is that if Jesus WERE a magician, he'd blow everyone away even with today's standards. Stuff happened in the times that just simply were not possible to be made by man.