Why is Everyone so Against the War?
- Thread starter clown boy
- Start date
stdreb27
Active Member
Originally Posted by MIKE22cha
It wasn't congress who ordered the invasion of Iraq. And we're arguing what was the purpose to go in! There's something wrong if the people of a nation don't know why we didn't go into a war. And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
umm, actually congress voted twice, to approve the attack. Included in the yes votes are some of your heros like clinton, and kerry.
Lies of fox news, dude, hate to tell you, but they aren't that conservative. And the folks on there that are conservative don't claim to be other wise. I wonder why they are the most watched cable new network.
It wasn't congress who ordered the invasion of Iraq. And we're arguing what was the purpose to go in! There's something wrong if the people of a nation don't know why we didn't go into a war. And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
umm, actually congress voted twice, to approve the attack. Included in the yes votes are some of your heros like clinton, and kerry.
Lies of fox news, dude, hate to tell you, but they aren't that conservative. And the folks on there that are conservative don't claim to be other wise. I wonder why they are the most watched cable new network.
1journeyman
Active Member
Originally Posted by MIKE22cha
It wasn't congress who ordered the invasion of Iraq. And we're arguing what was the purpose to go in! There's something wrong if the people of a nation don't know why we didn't go into a war. And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
Have you read the Joint Resolution to Authorize the use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq? (Title kind of gives it away...)
You can find it easily enough on the web. Many of the folks on this thread need to read it.
"AUTHORIZATION. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq. "
1journeyman
Active Member
Originally Posted by MIKE22cha
.... And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
After you are done reading the Resolution, can you list some lies Fox News has run?
.... And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
After you are done reading the Resolution, can you list some lies Fox News has run?
jovial
Member
Originally Posted by MIKE22cha
It wasn't congress who ordered the invasion of Iraq. And we're arguing what was the purpose to go in! There's something wrong if the people of a nation don't know why we didn't go into a war. And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
The lies of Fox news, as compared to what the truth of NBC?
It wasn't congress who ordered the invasion of Iraq. And we're arguing what was the purpose to go in! There's something wrong if the people of a nation don't know why we didn't go into a war. And it's not because we're idiots and don't believe the lies of Fox News.
stdreb27
Active Member
Originally Posted by Jovial
The lies of Fox news, as compared to what the truth of NBC?
Don't forget Dan Rather and the faked papers. Remember that Rather insisted that he answer the allegations even after the papers were proven fakes.
Or how about them IGNORING that Clinton fired everyone in the justice department after taking office while creating a scandle about Gonzalez firing 8.
Don't forget Dan Rather and the faked papers. Remember that Rather insisted that he answer the allegations even after the papers were proven fakes.
Or how about them IGNORING that Clinton fired everyone in the justice department after taking office while creating a scandle about Gonzalez firing 8.
jovial
Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
Don't forget Dan Rather and the faked papers. Remember that Rather insisted that he answer the allegations even after the papers were proven fakes.
Or how about them IGNORING that Clinton fired everyone in the justice department after taking office while creating a scandle about Gonzalez firing 8.
Also at the time, allegations concerning some of the Clintons' Whitewater dealings were coming to a head. By dismissing all 93 U.S. Attorneys at once, the Clintons conveniently cleared the decks to appoint "Friend of Bill" Paula Casey as the U.S. Attorney for Little Rock. Ms. Casey never did bring any big Whitewater indictments, and she rejected information from another FOB, David Hale, on the business practices of the Arkansas elite including Mr. Clinton. When it comes to "politicizing" Justice, in short, the Bush White House is full of amateurs compared to the Clintons.
Don't forget Dan Rather and the faked papers. Remember that Rather insisted that he answer the allegations even after the papers were proven fakes.
Or how about them IGNORING that Clinton fired everyone in the justice department after taking office while creating a scandle about Gonzalez firing 8.
Also at the time, allegations concerning some of the Clintons' Whitewater dealings were coming to a head. By dismissing all 93 U.S. Attorneys at once, the Clintons conveniently cleared the decks to appoint "Friend of Bill" Paula Casey as the U.S. Attorney for Little Rock. Ms. Casey never did bring any big Whitewater indictments, and she rejected information from another FOB, David Hale, on the business practices of the Arkansas elite including Mr. Clinton. When it comes to "politicizing" Justice, in short, the Bush White House is full of amateurs compared to the Clintons.
veni vidi vici
Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
you've never heard dems up north called Blueblooded? Like you hear it sometimes refering to unions towns in places like michigan and stuff.
Proud ,Red Blooded American,Union card carrying Republican from Illinois
you've never heard dems up north called Blueblooded? Like you hear it sometimes refering to unions towns in places like michigan and stuff.
Proud ,Red Blooded American,Union card carrying Republican from Illinois
B
beananimal
Guest
Originally Posted by Jovial
http:///forum/post/2278176
Also at the time, allegations concerning some of the Clintons' Whitewater dealings were coming to a head. By dismissing all 93 U.S. Attorneys at once, the Clintons conveniently cleared the decks to appoint "Friend of Bill" Paula Casey as the U.S. Attorney for Little Rock. Ms. Casey never did bring any big Whitewater indictments, and she rejected information from another FOB, David Hale, on the business practices of the Arkansas elite including Mr. Clinton. When it comes to "politicizing" Justice, in short, the Bush White House is full of amateurs compared to the Clintons.
Amen!
This thread made my eyes bleed. And to think that the dems wanted an investigation because W. fired a handfull that refused to do their jobs.
Vince Foster? Ron Brown? Ron Browns Layer? Ed Wiley?
The crimes did not stop when they left.. Hell look at Jamie Gorelik and the other members that were loaded onto the 911 comission to protect the Clinton legacy. What about Sandy Berger being sent to the National Archives to destroy the paper trail.
Anway, none of it matters.
Thank a soldier today and every day, they are the ones who secure your freedom. You can't "support them but not their mission".
http:///forum/post/2278176
Also at the time, allegations concerning some of the Clintons' Whitewater dealings were coming to a head. By dismissing all 93 U.S. Attorneys at once, the Clintons conveniently cleared the decks to appoint "Friend of Bill" Paula Casey as the U.S. Attorney for Little Rock. Ms. Casey never did bring any big Whitewater indictments, and she rejected information from another FOB, David Hale, on the business practices of the Arkansas elite including Mr. Clinton. When it comes to "politicizing" Justice, in short, the Bush White House is full of amateurs compared to the Clintons.
Amen!
This thread made my eyes bleed. And to think that the dems wanted an investigation because W. fired a handfull that refused to do their jobs.
Vince Foster? Ron Brown? Ron Browns Layer? Ed Wiley?
The crimes did not stop when they left.. Hell look at Jamie Gorelik and the other members that were loaded onto the 911 comission to protect the Clinton legacy. What about Sandy Berger being sent to the National Archives to destroy the paper trail.
Anway, none of it matters.
Thank a soldier today and every day, they are the ones who secure your freedom. You can't "support them but not their mission".
1journeyman
Active Member
This thread came back from the grave. Keep it civil, no personal attacks and it will remain open.
M
metalhead
Guest
Because 9/11 was set up by the USA. Second there were no wepons of mass destruction. Look up world trade center 7. Its a pointless war.
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by MetalHead
http:///forum/post/2611706
Because 9/11 was set up by the USA. Second there were no wepons of mass destruction. Look up world trade center 7. Its a pointless war.
Rosie is that you?
http:///forum/post/2611706
Because 9/11 was set up by the USA. Second there were no wepons of mass destruction. Look up world trade center 7. Its a pointless war.
Rosie is that you?
bang guy
Moderator
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2611721
Rosie is that you?
Nah, it's probably just another Muslim extremist that hates Americans.
http:///forum/post/2611721
Rosie is that you?
Nah, it's probably just another Muslim extremist that hates Americans.
M
metalhead
Guest
Huh? Actuly im a agnostic canadian with irish british and polish descent...
reefraff
Active Member
Originally Posted by MetalHead
http:///forum/post/2611736
Huh? Actuly im a agnostic canadian with irish british and polish descent...
And no clue about what an imploding building looks like
http:///forum/post/2611736
Huh? Actuly im a agnostic canadian with irish british and polish descent...
And no clue about what an imploding building looks like
M
metalhead
Guest
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/2611774
And no clue about what an imploding building looks like
Hahahahahaha watch the video on world tade center 7, it collapsed like a structured demolition, it collasped due to (fire,) Yet no other bulding like that has collapsed from fire. The trade centers collapsed because the bottem pillers were demollished, it was a controlled demolition. When you think about it there were 3 planes, 2 hit target the other plane failed because a heroic person prevented the hijackers. Then you wonder why a building which wasnt hit TOTALY collapsed due to fires...Its pretty apparent to me that that building was supposed to be hit by that plane, but the plane failed to hit target so media didn't mention it much at all, and the only repsonce was that it collapsed due to fire....
But you know what, thats just my opinion. That is why i personaly am against the war.
Edit: This is assuming that there actuly was a forth plane like the media says.
http:///forum/post/2611774
And no clue about what an imploding building looks like
Hahahahahaha watch the video on world tade center 7, it collapsed like a structured demolition, it collasped due to (fire,) Yet no other bulding like that has collapsed from fire. The trade centers collapsed because the bottem pillers were demollished, it was a controlled demolition. When you think about it there were 3 planes, 2 hit target the other plane failed because a heroic person prevented the hijackers. Then you wonder why a building which wasnt hit TOTALY collapsed due to fires...Its pretty apparent to me that that building was supposed to be hit by that plane, but the plane failed to hit target so media didn't mention it much at all, and the only repsonce was that it collapsed due to fire....
But you know what, thats just my opinion. That is why i personaly am against the war.
Edit: This is assuming that there actuly was a forth plane like the media says.
M
metalhead
Guest
Yeah okay...