Yea, Bush's 'War On Terror' is working great

groupergenius

groupergenius

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3144875
But why should I? You're doing such a great job for me.

I like your little reference about 'timeframe'. Maybe I should grab the poll counts from the number of Americans who approved of the Iraq War AFTER we got rid of Sadaam, and realized we were duped by Bush when no WMD's were found. Think they'd be as slanted as the one's prior to us going in?
Duped by Bush??? I thought he was a moron? How could he fool the American public?
 
reefraff

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3144860
Let's see...
The Gallop Poll is probably the only one of the three that has any credance, and the one you listed had no poll as to whther the American public supported Bush's war in Iraq.
The FoxNews Poll is a waste of space. Any poll they've ever conducted is so far to the right, it isn't worth believing.
The ABCNews Poll? Ehat was conducted with a whopping total of 510 adults. WOW! Now that's a accurate assessment of what 260 MILLION peoiple think.

Try again...
Try reading the polling questions. I never saw retaliation for 9-11 mentioned as a reason for invading Iraq. Up thread you said that was the only reason the public was in favor of the war.
I guess the fact that the polling company Fox uses is among the most accurate when predicting election results we should just ignore it because you don't like Fox? Your really hosed now because BSNBC partners with the wall street journal, another News Corp holding to do their polling. I guess there's always the on line poll from the Huffington post
 
reefraff

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3144875
But why should I? You're doing such a great job for me.

I like your little reference about 'timeframe'. Maybe I should grab the poll counts from the number of Americans who approved of the Iraq War AFTER we got rid of Sadaam, and realized we were duped by Bush when no WMD's were found. Think they'd be as slanted as the one's prior to us going in?
Are you not capable of making your point without making up lies about Bush? If as you say he duped us so did
France
Russia
England
All believed the WMD's were there.
The UN imposed numerous sanctions against Iraq for their constant efforts to impede inspectors sent there to find and eliminate the WMD's the vast majority of member nations of the UN believed Iraq was hiding.
US politicians like the Clintons, Former Democrat Senate Leader Tom Daschel and even Ted Kennedy who made one of the strongest statements about Iraq's WMD's in his speech against the war. "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction"
 
sepulatian

sepulatian

Moderator
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3144869
How do you know he's coming back? As far as you know, he's lost all interest in the saltwater hobby, or is hanging out in some mission in Australia.
The only reason I even mentioned journey's name regarding this topic is because he was one of the most adamant about our cause in Iraq. Trust me, there's plenty of active posters that currently participate in this forum that will carry on journey's tradition. If you prefer, I'll keep my comments directed towards them (unless of course journey does reappear, like the phantom WMD's in Iraq).
How do you know what we know? You don't.
Feel free to comment toward the others that actually want to participate in this discussion...
 
darthtang aw

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3144718
What's the difference? Whose the main faction in the last 10 years that's the leader in world terrorism? AL QAEDA. Sorry, my mind may be getting feable in its old age, but I do remember those debates.
Journey never insulted me?
1. Find a post of Journey insulting you. Shouldn't be that hard if he did it as regularly as you claim....run a quick search.
2. Exactly my point...there is no difference between al qaeda and any other terrorist faction or call for terrorism. Thanks for proving my point. would you defend a rapist if someone called them a child rapist and they never raped children? Would he still be ok...no...he is still a rapist.
Therefore even though sadaam may or may not have aided or supportted al qaeda...he still supported, funded, and aided Terrorists.....which has been and always weill be our point on this.......Proven by Hussein's own words............
 
reefraff

reefraff

Active Member
I ain't going to say Journey never insulted Bionic in the heat of battle but he was generally pretty careful in his posts. I try not to take mean shots but every once in a while I let one slip through

Anyway I think what Sep is trying to say is don't cast stones at someone who isn't here to duck. I don't really think Bionic has really insulted the Jman unless I missed something but I think a preemptive warning to keep things from going too far is not out of line either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top