Quote:
Originally Posted by
2Quills http:///t/196219/acrylic-bonding-techniques-aquarium-construction/40#post_3515933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phixer http:///t/196219/acrylic-bonding-techniques-aquarium-construction/40#post_3515913
No, if using solvent to bond think of it as melting the two sections together into one. On thicker material solvent just dosent cover as well, so 2 part cements such as PS30 or 40 or #42 are used. These cements are extremely strong, recommended by Cyro and are what are used to seam the large panels together for public tanks. They are more forgiving of surface irregularities. Machining can cause tension within the material if done improperly which is when annealing would be required to relieve the internal stresses....in a small nutshell.
Actually that was another one of those questions in my head. Does using #40 or 42 negate some of the potential crazing that can often occur with a typical solvent joint such us with the more commonly used #3 or 4? Because for me if it can't be totally aesthetically pleasing after all that time, effort and cost that goes into a build then I'm not gonna be happy.
Man you're on par tonight lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by acrylic51 http:///t/196219/acrylic-bonding-techniques-aquarium-construction/40#post_3515920
Corey I'm sure you saw the thread over on RC where the guy did it with a 10' tank....I actually followed that thread intently.......The joint area isn't stressed.....though you have to be very meticulous with finishing it though as to not overheat it or rush the sanding process......A big key to the joint not being compromised is it's not a simple butt joint, but a controlled cut something similar as to what I described to Phixer in an earlier post......Gambling.....possibly......I look at it as "faith" in my abilities.....Practice though....
Although it might be cheaper and more advantageous to just have 10' sheets brought in or whatever length you might need, but sometimes the cost just isn't worth it.......I wouldn't be using thin material as well for the project....Hopefully the other poster will chime in with more insight into what he's trying to accomplish.
Hey, Shawn. I do vaguely remember a build a while back I think where a guy did a 10 or 12 footer. But it's been a while so I don't remember the details. I do remember a bit of discussion on the big acrylic thread where James was providing a little of his insight as well. And a similar discussion came up but it wasn't very detailed. I do specifically remember James mentioning in regards to a miter joint vs the typical butt joint that a 45 degree miter joint (if done properly) is actually better because it provided more surface area for joining. I thought it made some sense to me in my head. But again, details are a tad hazy there as well.
My initial post wasn't so much questioning you guys as much as it was just about bringing up some more things to think about for anyone else who may be following along. This is one of the more interesting topics that I've seen brought up around here in a while.
Quill, it really depends on the application. Two part cements will not inhibit crazing if the base material is under tension. The best way to prevent crazing is to ensure your material is of the correct thickness to begin with for the tank size and that it is machined properly by not inducing internal stress into the material. Very often this is done by maintaining the proper feed rate and keeping the cutter head (blade or bit) cool.
Typically, IMO Ive seen machining stress not go more than .060 into the material and can be removed by light scraping. How can you check this before bonding. Some will cringe at what Im going to say but it works well if done properly. Wiping a freshly machined edge with denatured alcohol (normally you keep alcohol away from acrylic) will instanly reveal internal stress as crazing, if it crazes you scrape it down and repeat the process before bonding until you have a straight edge that dosent craze when wiped.
About annealing and crazing, think of it this way, if you were to strike the plastic hard enough to cause a dent in the material, it will naturally want to try to return to a relaxed state. Internal tension / stress is often imparted during machining by not keeping the blade or bit cool or by dull bits, acrylic is hard and dulls cutters quickly. When the joint is bonded with unrelieved internall stress this stress gets sealed in. It has to go somewhere, temps and humidity play a role in this also. As the material tries to rebound to it's natural state (equilibrium if you will) it is manifested as very small hairline fractures within the material i.e joint line. This is why you typically see crazing along machined joint lines or areas that have been thermoformed that havent been allowed to cool in increments allowing the molecules to re-align properly. The stored energy has to go somewhere. The process of annealing heats the material allowing it to expand to a relaxed state and then cooling it in increments over time. Kind of like soaking sore muscles in a hot tub. LOL
Something else to consider. Really large public tanks are often comprised of joining multiple panels together on site using 2 part polymerizable cements. Many are not annealed before joining because the sheets/panels are still too large for most annealing ovens unless your dealing with Reynolds or a small handful of others. The reason they can do this is because of the care taken when machining the edges. If no internal stress is imparted into the base material there is no reason to anneal. Remember, annealing is done to relieve internal stress prior to bonding. 2 part cement mfgs recommend this because it's the only stuff to use for the thicker material on the big tanks and these edges are often heavily machined (i.e beveled) which creates the potential for internal stress and thus a requirement for annealing. No stress = no annealing.
Sorry for the long winded answer. The shorter version is a simple no.