Anti Obama Threads
- Thread starter calbert0
- Start date
reefraff
Active Member
Originally Posted by Cranberry
http:///forum/post/3186837
I'm gonna guess there are more anti threads now. I have zero interest in politics... I won't even tell you how far my ignorance runs. Nothing has really stirred my interest before. But the peeps "in charge" now.... they are starting to piss me off.
During the election we had some trolls pushing the Obama side of things so it was a little more even but there seem to be more conservatives here so I would guess the anti bush threads were not quite as common but they were here.
http:///forum/post/3186837
I'm gonna guess there are more anti threads now. I have zero interest in politics... I won't even tell you how far my ignorance runs. Nothing has really stirred my interest before. But the peeps "in charge" now.... they are starting to piss me off.
During the election we had some trolls pushing the Obama side of things so it was a little more even but there seem to be more conservatives here so I would guess the anti bush threads were not quite as common but they were here.
stdreb27
Active Member
Originally Posted by calbert0
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
To imply an unfareness because of a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama. And this is simply not the case...
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
To imply an unfareness because of a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama. And this is simply not the case...
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3186852
To imply an unfareness because of a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama. And this is simply not the case...
uhhhh - what?
I'm sorry. Your analogy makes no sense whatsoever to me. Could you please explain your logic?
http:///forum/post/3186852
To imply an unfareness because of a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama. And this is simply not the case...
uhhhh - what?
I'm sorry. Your analogy makes no sense whatsoever to me. Could you please explain your logic?
t316
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3186880
uhhhh - what?
Your analogy makes no sense whatsoever.
Makes perfect sense to me...
Which part did you not understand?
http:///forum/post/3186880
uhhhh - what?
Your analogy makes no sense whatsoever.
Makes perfect sense to me...
Which part did you not understand?
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/3186881
Makes perfect sense to me...
Which part did you not understand?
This part: "a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama."
The quote implies that, because there is a deficit of opinion on one side, that indicates that that same lack of opinion on the other side is indicitave of something meaningful.
It doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps I'm a moron, but I don't understand the point...
http:///forum/post/3186881
Makes perfect sense to me...
Which part did you not understand?
This part: "a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama."
The quote implies that, because there is a deficit of opinion on one side, that indicates that that same lack of opinion on the other side is indicitave of something meaningful.
It doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps I'm a moron, but I don't understand the point...
reefraff
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3186887
This part: "a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama."
The quote implies that, because there is a deficit of opinion on one side, that indicates that that same lack of opinion on the other side is indicitave of something meaningful.
It doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps I'm a moron, but I don't understand the point...
Curveball hanging in space
I think his point is for all Bushes faults he would be a breath of fresh air compared to Barrakrupt Spendbama
http:///forum/post/3186887
This part: "a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama."
The quote implies that, because there is a deficit of opinion on one side, that indicates that that same lack of opinion on the other side is indicitave of something meaningful.
It doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps I'm a moron, but I don't understand the point...
Curveball hanging in space
I think his point is for all Bushes faults he would be a breath of fresh air compared to Barrakrupt Spendbama
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3186890
Curveball hanging in space
I think his point is for all Bushes faults he would be a breath of fresh air compared to Barrakrupt Spendbama
Perhaps. On some level I accept that, in that a difference of opinion could be construed as a breath of fresh air.
I have yet to see something original from the political class. It's not like Arbusto had any brilliant ideas of his own.
I'm too old to accept that either side's opinion is more than a mental fart. I've been around long enough to know better.
On one hand, "taxation without representation" is a question. On the other hand, can I rely upon polititians (my representatives) not to take advantage of me?
http:///forum/post/3186890
Curveball hanging in space
I think his point is for all Bushes faults he would be a breath of fresh air compared to Barrakrupt Spendbama
Perhaps. On some level I accept that, in that a difference of opinion could be construed as a breath of fresh air.
I have yet to see something original from the political class. It's not like Arbusto had any brilliant ideas of his own.
I'm too old to accept that either side's opinion is more than a mental fart. I've been around long enough to know better.
On one hand, "taxation without representation" is a question. On the other hand, can I rely upon polititians (my representatives) not to take advantage of me?
reefraff
Active Member
I usually don't even waste my time on conspiracy theories but there is an interesting one floating around about a deliberate move to create such a monumental amount of debt we can't dig out way out as a way of forcing a world economic structure. I need to try to dig that info back up because I am beginning to believe their might be something to it.
jennythebugg
Active Member
Originally Posted by calbert0
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
yes
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
yes
sickboy
Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3186897
I usually don't even waste my time on conspiracy theories but there is an interesting one floating around about a deliberate move to create such a monumental amount of debt we can't dig out way out as a way of forcing a world economic structure. I need to try to dig that info back up because I am beginning to believe their might be something to it.
Unless repubs and dems are a part of that, I'm sure it doesn't make sense, after all, Reagan is the one who showed us "deficits don't matter..."
http:///forum/post/3186897
I usually don't even waste my time on conspiracy theories but there is an interesting one floating around about a deliberate move to create such a monumental amount of debt we can't dig out way out as a way of forcing a world economic structure. I need to try to dig that info back up because I am beginning to believe their might be something to it.
Unless repubs and dems are a part of that, I'm sure it doesn't make sense, after all, Reagan is the one who showed us "deficits don't matter..."
sickboy
Active Member
Originally Posted by calbert0
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
Yes, many started by me, and if I was on here more, I would start many anti-Obama threads. I think we should fire them all and start from scratch, starting with the structure of Federally funding political parties, ie. the two that are ALWAYS in charge and using tax payer dollars to keep them in charge to screw things up....
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
Yes, many started by me, and if I was on here more, I would start many anti-Obama threads. I think we should fire them all and start from scratch, starting with the structure of Federally funding political parties, ie. the two that are ALWAYS in charge and using tax payer dollars to keep them in charge to screw things up....
jtt
Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/3186881
Makes perfect sense to me...
Which part did you not understand?
makes sense to me too
http:///forum/post/3186881
Makes perfect sense to me...
Which part did you not understand?
makes sense to me too
renogaw
Active Member
geridoc
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3186852
To imply an unfareness because of a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama. And this is simply not the case...
I agree - Bush was much more of a moron!
http:///forum/post/3186852
To imply an unfareness because of a percieved lack of Bush bashing threads, would be to imply that Bush was as much of a moron as Obama. And this is simply not the case...
I agree - Bush was much more of a moron!
kingsmith
Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3186893
On the other hand, can I rely upon polititians (my representatives) not to take advantage of me?
Best thought I've seen in a political thread in a long time
http:///forum/post/3186893
On the other hand, can I rely upon polititians (my representatives) not to take advantage of me?
Best thought I've seen in a political thread in a long time
beaslbob
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by calbert0
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
Yep
Just part of being president.
It has happened to every president thorugh other media before the aquarium ever started.
my .02
http:///forum/post/3186831
I have only been a member of this forum durring the Obama Administration...
But i have to ask, were there as many anti Bush threads durring the previous administration as there are anti Obama threads now??
I'm not speaking for or against anyone or any thread, i am just curious...
Yep
Just part of being president.
It has happened to every president thorugh other media before the aquarium ever started.
my .02
stdreb27
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3186893
Perhaps. On some level I accept that, in that a difference of opinion could be construed as a breath of fresh air.
I have yet to see something original from the political class. It's not like Arbusto had any brilliant ideas of his own.
Just because bush didn't come up with the idea of spreading our ideals, that all men are created equal and they are endowed by our creator with unalienable rights, of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Doesn't mean that it isn't a dang good idea. We don't need new ideas, we need the good ideas already out there to win out in the minds of the people...
BTW wasn't it the "great" obama the one who ran on "new" ideas. (Like new because we don't remember the 30's. And FDR's great depression...
btw (halfway jokingly) my point was, if Bush was as much of a moron as Obama, there would have been more Bush bashing threads. The reason there are soo many Obama bashing threads is because he is that incompetent.
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3186897
I usually don't even waste my time on conspiracy theories but there is an interesting one floating around about a deliberate move to create such a monumental amount of debt we can't dig out way out as a way of forcing a world economic structure. I need to try to dig that info back up because I am beginning to believe their might be something to it.
I first heard that on Glen Beck, the one time I actually listened to him. I don't remember who's article he was reading. But it is a fun conspiracy theory. The idea was to devaluate our currency soo much, so it would be cheaper for us to pay off our debt. Since it was worthless, and alot of our debt is to be paid off in U.S. Dollars anyway.
http:///forum/post/3186893
Perhaps. On some level I accept that, in that a difference of opinion could be construed as a breath of fresh air.
I have yet to see something original from the political class. It's not like Arbusto had any brilliant ideas of his own.
Just because bush didn't come up with the idea of spreading our ideals, that all men are created equal and they are endowed by our creator with unalienable rights, of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Doesn't mean that it isn't a dang good idea. We don't need new ideas, we need the good ideas already out there to win out in the minds of the people...
BTW wasn't it the "great" obama the one who ran on "new" ideas. (Like new because we don't remember the 30's. And FDR's great depression...
btw (halfway jokingly) my point was, if Bush was as much of a moron as Obama, there would have been more Bush bashing threads. The reason there are soo many Obama bashing threads is because he is that incompetent.
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3186897
I usually don't even waste my time on conspiracy theories but there is an interesting one floating around about a deliberate move to create such a monumental amount of debt we can't dig out way out as a way of forcing a world economic structure. I need to try to dig that info back up because I am beginning to believe their might be something to it.
I first heard that on Glen Beck, the one time I actually listened to him. I don't remember who's article he was reading. But it is a fun conspiracy theory. The idea was to devaluate our currency soo much, so it would be cheaper for us to pay off our debt. Since it was worthless, and alot of our debt is to be paid off in U.S. Dollars anyway.
