Conservatives vs. Liberals

yearofthenick

Active Member
Got this in an email today - pretty gutsy. Some things I think are a funny play on stereotypes, some seem eerily true, and some are ridiculously false. What's your take?
Read on....
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't` eat meat. If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy. If a liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life. If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
If a person of color is conservative, they see themselves as independently successful. Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is embarrassed. If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and then sues.
If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
A liberal will delete it because he's "offended".
 

bang guy

Moderator
If a conservative wants to breathe clean air he buys a gas mask.
If a liberal wants clean air he demands industry stop polluting it.
 

reefraff

Active Member
You don't really see many true conservatives or liberals any more. In both their purest forms neither would favor the big intrusive government we have now.
 

slf125

Member
true, but only if you think every liberal subscribes to every ideology of Liberalism and would also take that to absurd extremes. So yeah.....
howver, with that said, I agree with your second comment Reefraff.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by SLF125
http:///forum/post/3272821
true, but only if you think every liberal subscribes to every ideology of Liberalism and would also take that to absurd extremes. So yeah.....
howver, with that said, I agree with your second comment Reefraff.
There are plenty of people taking liberalism to the extreme, they control the democrat party. Conservatism taken to the extreme leaves you in the libertarian party for the most part. Extreme and pure are not the same thing.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Bang Guy
http:///forum/post/3272724
If a conservative wants to breathe clean air he buys a gas mask.
If a liberal wants clean air he demands industry stop polluting it.
if a lib wants more power and money, he creates a crisis, finds a few bad scientists and gets all their friends to go along with it. After all who doesn't want clean air.
 

aquaknight

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3272894
if a lib wants more power and money, he creates a crisis, finds a few bad scientists and gets all their friends to go along with it.
And then force companies to buy imaginary 'carbon credits' from them, at a predetermined rate, that they decide...
 

slf125

Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3272829
There are plenty of people taking liberalism to the extreme, they control the democrat party. Conservatism taken to the extreme leaves you in the libertarian party for the most part. Extreme and pure are not the same thing.
well, perhaps. Although i doubt the extremes thatit can be taken to. I was responding to the Op, not to your comments because i know there is a difference.
 

mantisman51

Active Member
I guess I'm a hybrid. I believe business and individuals need less government intrusion and everyone is paying too much in taxes-except Exxon, they don't pay any U.S. taxes according to Bill O'Reilly. I also am pro-life, pro-traditional family and believe our forefathers never intended to have a secular government-just no established religion. I believe that Ronaldus Magnus was right and that being the most powerful nation keeps us safe. I think global warming is a myth, but I agree with much of the Democratics:) environmental policies regarding fuel economy and alternative energy but only as independence from oil will make us less subservient to the Arabs who use our money to fund our enemies. I still don't see how unrestricted free trade with communist countries helps us and think the WTC and free trade are harmful. Also, that if banks get special treatment-like borrowing from the fed at .15% and then buying t-bonds at 2 1/2% then yeah, the same government has the right to rein in their abusive practices-including rapacious pay. So, I guess I have no party or affiliation. Am I conservative or liberal?
 

reefraff

Active Member
I think government regulation is great, in the right areas. If the banks are getting a sweet deal we don't need more regulation, we need smarter government. If average people really understood the federal reserve I think their would be a revolt in this country.
I am pretty much a hybrid too. I tend to vote Republican cause they tend to agree with me, not cause I agree with them.
 

mantisman51

Active Member
I also think people in medical professions should pay no income taxes of any kind if they are practicing non-cosmetic medicine unless it is needed to fix actual medically necessary issues. Like chest reconstruction after a mastectomy. I don't care if a doctor makes $50 mil a year, people who dedicate their lives to better the country and citizens should never pay income tax. It would encourage the brightest and best to pursue a career in medicine. That would be a conservative approach I believe.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by mantisman51
http:///forum/post/3273161
I guess I'm a hybrid. I believe business and individuals need less government intrusion and everyone is paying too much in taxes-except Exxon, they don't pay any U.S. taxes according to Bill O'Reilly. I also am pro-life, pro-traditional family and believe our forefathers never intended to have a secular government-just no established religion. I believe that Ronaldus Magnus was right and that being the most powerful nation keeps us safe. I think global warming is a myth, but I agree with much of the Democratics:) environmental policies regarding fuel economy and alternative energy but only as independence from oil will make us less subservient to the Arabs who use our money to fund our enemies. I still don't see how unrestricted free trade with communist countries helps us and think the WTC and free trade are harmful. Also, that if banks get special treatment-like borrowing from the fed at .15% and then buying t-bonds at 2 1/2% then yeah, the same government has the right to rein in their abusive practices-including rapacious pay. So, I guess I have no party or affiliation. Am I conservative or liberal?
If you think the greenie dems care about the environment then you're nuts. I think it is really simple. Al Gore won a nobel Prize for fake data in his tree hugging movie. He is hte face of the tree huggers. But he lives in a 10k sq house, and uses about as much electricity as a small town.
Bush was very maligned for being anti-green. But his house in crawford was very self sufficient. Rain water collector, natural recycled stone, the list goes on.
I'm very conservative, and I'm all for actually taking care of the environment. Not filling my house with 8 dollar lightbulbs with enough mercury in them to need a hazmat team if they break. Or driving a car powered off of batteries filled with heavy metals. Or calling what trees need to breath a pollutant... It is just asinine.
as for oil usage, their is plenty of oil here in the states, without having to go fund terrorist. If only the politicians would let them drill...
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by mantisman51
http:///forum/post/3273172
I also think people in medical professions should pay no income taxes of any kind if they are practicing non-cosmetic medicine unless it is needed to fix actual medically necessary issues. Like chest reconstruction after a mastectomy. I don't care if a doctor makes $50 mil a year, people who dedicate their lives to better the country and citizens should never pay income tax. It would encourage the brightest and best to pursue a career in medicine. That would be a conservative approach I believe.
What if said doctor got his education through publically funded schools, dont they owe something back? Why limit it to docs, what about nurses, fire and police people? Military? You start down a slippery slope the rusults can be no fun
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3273194
If you think the greenie dems care about the environment then you're nuts. I think it is really simple. Al Gore won a nobel Prize for fake data in his tree hugging movie. He is hte face of the tree huggers. But he lives in a 10k sq house, and uses about as much electricity as a small town.
Bush was very maligned for being anti-green. But his house in crawford was very self sufficient. Rain water collector, natural recycled stone, the list goes on.
I'm very conservative, and I'm all for actually taking care of the environment. Not filling my house with 8 dollar lightbulbs with enough mercury in them to need a hazmat team if they break. Or driving a car powered off of batteries filled with heavy metals. Or calling what trees need to breath a pollutant... It is just asinine.
as for oil usage, their is plenty of oil here in the states, without having to go fund terrorist. If only the politicians would let them drill...
Don't buy into everything you hear about the evils of the compact fluorescent lamp. Not all liberal enviros are low life lying hippocrites like Algore. Some actually live what they believe. Check out Ed Bagley's show some time.
 

aquaknight

Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3273204
Don't buy into everything you hear about the evils of the compact fluorescent lamp. Not all liberal enviros are low life lying hippocrites like Algore. Some actually live what they believe. Check out Ed Bagley's show some time.
Either way, it should be a consumer decision to switch. Not federally mandated "no more incandescents" or retarded MPG requirements. If we all wanted spiral lights or hybrid cars, we would buy them and manufactures would stop producing the "bad stuff"
....
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by AquaKnight
http:///forum/post/3273212
Either way, it should be a consumer decision to switch. Not federally mandated "no more incandescents" or retarded MPG requirements. If we all wanted spiral lights or hybrid cars, we would buy them and manufactures would stop producing the "bad stuff"
....
I sorta agree. I am all for encouraging people to make smarter choices but ENCOURAGE, not mandate.
 
Top