pezenfuego
Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bang Guy http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/600#post_3494360
You have a flaw with a premise, not with an equation. While there is not an infinite number of species on earth, you got that right, there is the potential for an infinite number of permutations because the DNA chain is indeterminant.
In addition, most permutations are unrealized, you need to subtract these from the indefinate sum
There is the potential for an infinite number of permutations, but that potential can never and will never be realized. I think you misinterpreted what I was trying to say. Why should we stop at crocoducks? Why not croco-croco-ducks (after all this idea states that EVERY two species has an intermediate). Why not croco-croco-croco-ducks? And so on and so forth. That's the view that some people have about evolution. Every species does share a common ancestor, but not in this manner. The big mistake is thinking of organisms in an absolute unvarying way. There is nothing rigid about a species, that's just a trick our minds play. I'll explain that in a later post when I have time. There's a really good Plato analogy here (somewhat mathematical as well).
The point is that a lot of creationists deny evolution because they simply don't understand it. Not only is this morphed view of evolution difficult to believe, but it is possible to prove false.
Quote:
Someone needs to get some...
Yeah, no kidding. I go to an all guy's college. I'm 19 and it's been 3 months. 3 months for a 19 year old is like 12 years for an adult.
Originally Posted by Bang Guy http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/600#post_3494360
You have a flaw with a premise, not with an equation. While there is not an infinite number of species on earth, you got that right, there is the potential for an infinite number of permutations because the DNA chain is indeterminant.
In addition, most permutations are unrealized, you need to subtract these from the indefinate sum
There is the potential for an infinite number of permutations, but that potential can never and will never be realized. I think you misinterpreted what I was trying to say. Why should we stop at crocoducks? Why not croco-croco-ducks (after all this idea states that EVERY two species has an intermediate). Why not croco-croco-croco-ducks? And so on and so forth. That's the view that some people have about evolution. Every species does share a common ancestor, but not in this manner. The big mistake is thinking of organisms in an absolute unvarying way. There is nothing rigid about a species, that's just a trick our minds play. I'll explain that in a later post when I have time. There's a really good Plato analogy here (somewhat mathematical as well).
The point is that a lot of creationists deny evolution because they simply don't understand it. Not only is this morphed view of evolution difficult to believe, but it is possible to prove false.
Quote:
Someone needs to get some...
Yeah, no kidding. I go to an all guy's college. I'm 19 and it's been 3 months. 3 months for a 19 year old is like 12 years for an adult.