Most of you were wrong. Do you have the class to admit it?

bang guy

Moderator
We'll see sometime in the next 5 years if it was a good idea to leave care of the hen house to the foxes. Perhaps, the company will flourish when workers have a more vested interest. Perhaps, the union will maintain the status quo and bleed the company to an early grave. Only time will reveal that outcome.
 

reefraff

Active Member
I really wonder how much longer union member will tolerate such huge amounts of their money being funneled to political candidates they likely don't support. Especially when they are being asked to kick in more money for their benefits in many cases. If the estimates are right 60% of members AREN'T Democrats.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaKnight http:///forum/thread/385860/most-of-you-were-wrong-do-you-have-the-class-to-admit-it/40#post_3389826
As far Akerson's comments on gas tax, every article also quotes Bill Ford Jr. as CEO of Ford, saying the exact same thing. But it's GM so they get bashed.... No hiding the comments are idiotic, especially when he starts getting into "Our customers should be buying more Cruzes and less Suburbans." That's just an instant facepalm. These green morons act like everyone has the exact same needs from a vehicle. Do they really think people who buy Suburbans use them strictly to commute 40mins to work everyday? Or do most of them tend to actually have a need for such a vehicle (towing a trailer and hauling people). Just towed a 15" box trailer from Orlando to here in our Suby. 75mph, not the slightest complaint the whole way. How can a Cruze do that? Can a Cruze launch a 25' Cuddy Cabin down a slippery boat ramp?
The ford guy has been saying that for a while too. I've at least mocked him in my head for it. I don't remember if I've brought him up here. IMO it is worse, come on the GM guy is an Obama guy, of course he's going to support the company line. (and by company I mean the Obama line) The ford guy going out to say that, is perplexing. (well actually no it isn't but when you have to sell a cars that meet a fleet fuel mileage requirements, and your only product making you money is an f-250 and up, well I can understand you favoring government regulations that push people to your crappy matchbox cars that the government is forcing you to make)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bang Guy
http:///forum/thread/385860/most-of-you-were-wrong-do-you-have-the-class-to-admit-it/60#post_3389995
We'll see sometime in the next 5 years if it was a good idea to leave care of the hen house to the foxes. Perhaps, the company will flourish when workers have a more vested interest. Perhaps, the union will maintain the status quo and bleed the company to an early grave. Only time will reveal that outcome.
You know, this wasn't covered, but when the "unions" went in as management their cuts were deeper than the crap they wouldn't accept when they were just playing the Leech.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Our bailout dollars creating jobs. Gee, wonder why this wasn't more widely reported....
By Michael O'Boyle and Luis Rojas Mena
MEXICO CITY | Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:16pm EST
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - General Motors Co said it is investing $540 million in its motor plant in central Mexico to build more fuel-efficient engines for the recovering North American automobile market. The move by GM, flush with cash after its 2009 restructuring in bankruptcy, follows other investments in recent years by American, European and Asian automakers seeking to produce more fuel-efficient models in Mexico.
Mexican President Felipe Calderon welcomed the GM news, announced on Thursday, as a vote of confidence in Mexico, where rising drug violence has worried some foreign companies.
"This action shows confidence in Mexico and the conviction of one of the most important companies in the world that Mexico is a safe and productive place to invest," Calderon said at an event in the central industrial hub of Toluca, where GM operates one of its five facilities in the country. The U.S. automobile market bounced back in 2010 from a four-year slump, and a 50 percent surge in Mexican vehicle production last year helped speed the recovery of Latin America's second-biggest economy out of a deep recession.
GM and other U.S. automakers are readying a new generation of small cars to address a weakness in their product line-up that cost them sales when gas prices spiked in 2008.
The new engine production line is being built at a plant where GM shuttered production of gas-guzzling trucks during the recession, Calderon noted.
Automobiles and auto parts account for around one-fifth of Mexico's total manufactured exports. The country's recovery depends on solid demand from the United States, which buys around 80 percent of Mexico's exports.
GM Chief Executive Dan Akerson, who took over at the top U.S. automaker in September, has been pushing for more aggressive investment in new technology after cutbacks before the bankruptcy slowed GM's projected roll-out of cars for 2011 and 2012. GM will build 1.6-liter and 1.8-liter 4-cylinder engines at the Toluca plant.
Central Mexico has continued to draw big investments from major global companies even as some manufacturers are leery of expanding in violence-wracked cities near the U.S. border, where hundreds of plants churn out products for export.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
This is how our administration will handle border security. the more employed over there. the less that come here. Makes sense, doesn't it?
Darth (it does cut out the unions)Tang
 

reefraff

Active Member
This fish still stinks
http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/22/private-emails-detail-obama-admin-involvement-in-cutting-non-union-worker-pensions-post-gm-bailout/
 
Top