Originally Posted by
srfisher17
http:///forum/post/2937556
I see your point. But; if you knew they were mean; why get one in the first place? Assuming you didn't have similar, aggressive fish that would be proper tankmates? Maroons are terrors to smaller, more passive fish. But, IMO & IME, do very well with bigger, more aggressive fish. My take on this thread, the sixline stories are examples, is what fish looked good on its reputation---then became a bad decision.
He does fine with the only "fish" tankmate which is a trigger. But now, years into it, we would like to add another fish. The maroon limits our ability to add a tankmate. So I will never again assume that my wife will be happy with the same 2 fish for years and years. I suppose that if we had a higher mortality rate it would not be an issue, but at some point it would be nice to add a fish to the display without having it murderized by the clown. If we get to the point where we simply have to have more livestock then the 55, which has been empty for over a year, will get refilled. It will not receive a maroon or tomato clown or yellow tails.
So...in regards to Joe's original questions, "if I had to restock my tank with fish again which one would I definitely leave off the list." and "which of the fish currently in your tank would you NOT reintroduce and why.",
I must answer maroon clownfish.