ruaround
Active Member
Originally Posted by kjr_trig
http:///forum/post/3026949
LOL, your proving my point Bro...Not saying they produce the top NFL QB's, though they have had their share of Hall of Famer's, I'm saying they produce the most NFL QB's....I.E., you don't make an NFL roster at QB if you are bad.
BTW a little math for your earlier comment about how many ranked teams the mighty SEC has vs. the PAC....Here are the final ranking for this past season
1. Florida (60) 13-1 1,524
2. USC 12-1 1,393
3. Texas 12-1 1,389
4. Utah (1) 13-0 1,375
5. Oklahoma 12-2 1,333
6. Alabama 12-2 1,157
7. TCU 11-2 1,114
8. Penn State 11-2 1,091
9. Oregon 10-3 1,011
10. Georgia 10-3 904
11. Ohio State 10-3 874
12. Texas Tech 11-2 867
13. Boise State 12-1 809
14. Virginia Tech 10-4 740
15. Mississippi 9-4 620
16. Missouri 10-4 549
17. Cincinnati 11-3 493
18. Oklahoma State 9-4 480
19. Oregon State 9-4 407
20. Iowa 9-4 250
21. Brigham Young 10-3 248
22. Georgia Tech 9-4 219
23. Florida State 9-4 217
24. Michigan State 9-4 179
25. California 9-4 116
4 out of 10 for the PAC......4 out of 12 ranked for the SEC, and the PAC went undefeated in Bowl games and USC would have walked on Florida. Am I missing anything
That said, the SEC is and has been the best football conference for many years, but talking down on the PAC 10 just makes you look silly....ESPN hates the PAC and gives them horrible press, remember the PAC 10 is the only big conference signed with FOX Sports.
way to use the USA Today poll to fit your own needs... why dont you go through the entire 2008 and count up how many SEC teams were in the top 25 and then count up the SEC teams... and be sure to use that the only ranking that matters is the end of season... i know that is true, but why do you think the SEC consistantly has more teams with a tougher SOS... but that all together is another discussion... Leinart will fail, Palmer is done, and Booty will most likely FAIL as well...