Obama’s Science Czar Said a Born Baby ‘Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being

renogaw

renogaw

Active Member
dude, back in 1973 if you had cancer you were dead...36 year old books aren't interesting anymore, neither are their views
media's digging at anything again...
 
roadie996

roadie996

Member
so you're going to base this on a book written in the 70's and disregard the guy saying he doesn't really stand behind its information anymore?
...right...
 
stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
I disagree, if you follow the typical argument for killing unborn babies. They'll say they don't believe the baby is a human... And the line is when the baby is born.
Here Obama has appointed as his chief science consultant a guy who, you could argue, proposed (and recounted as far as I know) that a baby isn't really a human until further along in his development. Which then leaves open the door for infanticide. Which consequently is something obama supported when he voted to allow doctors to kill (or let die) a baby who survived an abortion.
So imo this is a very valid point of conversation.
 
veni vidi vici

veni vidi vici

Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3097905
Think before you post. This isn't a worthy story. If you start clogging the Aquarium with dumb political stories they will end up banning political threads all together.
If you think that these Czars that are being appointed arent something to be concerned with then by all means pass right over this thread.But if you take a look at some of these Czars one whom is a self proclaimed communist another who is a proponent of a One World Government then i dont know what to tell you.You are aware that these Czars that are being appointed are not required to answer to congress or anyone else other that the POTUS.
If that isnt disconcerting to ya then
dont read these types of posts.
 
veni vidi vici

veni vidi vici

Active Member
Here is a starting list of Obamas Czars. Before you call this a dumb post ,why dont you do a little research on some of their backgrounds and ideas.1. Herb Allison-TARP Czar2. Alan Bersin-Border Czar
3. Dennis Blair-Intelligence Czar
4. John Brennan-Terrorism Czar
5. Carol Browner-Energy Czar
6. Adolfo Carrion, Jr-Urban Affairs Czar
7. Ashton Carter-Weapons Czar
8. Aneesh Chopra-Technology Czar
9. Jeffrey Crowley-AIDS Czar
10. Cameron Davis-Great Lakes Czar
11. Nancy-Ann DeParle-Health Czar
12. Earl Devaney-Stimulus Accountability Czar
13. Joshua DuBois-Faith-based Czar
14. Kenneth Feinberg-Pay Czar
15. Danny Fried-Guantanamo Closure Czar
16. J. Scott Gration-Sudan Czar
17. Richard Holbrooke-Afghanistan Czar
18. John Holdren-Science Czar
19. Van Jones Green-Jobs Czar Self Proclaimed Communist
20. Gil Kerlikowske-Drug Czar
21. Vivek Kundra-Information Czar
22. George Mitchell-Mideast Peace Czar
23. Ed Montgomery-Car Czar
24. Dennis Ross-Mideast Policy Czar
25. Gary Samore-WMD Czar
26. Todd Stern-Climate Czar
27. Cass Sunstein-Regulatory Czar
28. Paul Volcker-Economic Czar
BTW this isnt a complete list and they are not appointed by or answer to congress.
 
jp30338

jp30338

Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3097905
Think before you post. This isn't a worthy story. If you start clogging the Aquarium with dumb political stories they will end up banning political threads all together.
This all that Veni does during the day. Looks up any/everything possible that is against his political views and posts it on here. Whata life!
 
veni vidi vici

veni vidi vici

Active Member
Originally Posted by jp30338
http:///forum/post/3097952
This all that Veni does during the day. Looks up any/everything possible that is against his political views and posts it on here. Whata life!

lol the only thing that would make my day complete would be knocking the snot out of you .
 
roadie996

roadie996

Member
Its still a post on an article that is about a 46 year old book. Things were looked upon MUCH differently back then. The post is just as pointless as the written article, regardless of who is appointed to where by whome.
edit* 36 year old
 
veni vidi vici

veni vidi vici

Active Member
Originally Posted by renogaw
http:///forum/post/3097900
dude, back in 1973 if you had cancer you were dead...36 year old books aren't interesting anymore, neither are their views
media's digging at anything again...
Its all about the ideas floating around in this persons head.The persons views back in the 70's are disturbing to me and im sure im not the only one.
Im sure at one point or another people change views over time ,im sure at one point Jeffery Dahlmer was content with killing a eating the neighbors cat until he had a change of view.Then again this person may have totally flipped on his views in a positive direction.Im just saying it amazes me at the type of people Obama surrounds himself with and people say "oh thats silly,Im sure he really a nice man"
 
alix2.0

alix2.0

Active Member
Philosophicopsychological transubstantiationalists, counterpropogandizing historicocabalistical floccipaucinihilipilifications anthropomorphologically, undenominationalized theologicometaphysical antidisestablishmentarianisms honorificabilitubinitadibus.

everyone knows you dont become a human being till you turn 18.
 
meowzer

meowzer

Moderator
LOL...In the 70's I thought Starsky and Hutch were it...I hope no one looks badly at me cause of that....
Sorry...just needed to add some humor....
 
veni vidi vici

veni vidi vici

Active Member
Originally Posted by roadie996
http:///forum/post/3097959
Its still a post on an article that is about a 46 year old book. Things were looked upon MUCH differently back then. The post is just as pointless as the written article, regardless of who is appointed to where by whome.
This was written along time ago too ,but its not less significant because its principals and values where printed over 200 years ago.
 
D

dragonzim

Active Member
Can we please get the political threads sticky back at the top so there is only one place where this drivel can be posted so it doesnt clutter up The Aquarium?
 
bionicarm

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by Veni Vidi Vici
http:///forum/post/3098033
*SIGH*
Face it Vici. People are getting tired of the constant political threads bashing Obama on a daily basis. You seem to be the lead conspirator. The only reason I contribute to them anymore is because someone has to be supportive of what the current President is attempting to do. I don't agree with all his policies, but at least I take a 'wait and see' approach before yelling like Chicken Little that the sky is falling. Do as jp said and get a life.
 
roadie996

roadie996

Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3098051
Face it Vici. People are getting tired of the constant political threads bashing Obama on a daily basis. You seem to be the lead conspirator. The only reason I contribute to them anymore is because someone has to be supportive of what the current President is attempting to do. I don't agree with all his policies, but at least I take a 'wait and see' approach before yelling like Chicken Little that the sky is falling. Do as jp said and get a life.
Thank you! It hasn't even been a year for Obama in office, GIVE THE GUY HIS CHANCE! Just like you'd want yours!
 
veni vidi vici

veni vidi vici

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3098051
Face it Vici. People are getting tired of the constant political threads bashing Obama on a daily basis. You seem to be the lead conspirator. The only reason I contribute to them anymore is because someone has to be supportive of what the current President is attempting to do. I don't agree with all his policies, but at least I take a 'wait and see' approach before yelling like Chicken Little that the sky is falling. Do as jp said and get a life.
Well until political threads are banned ill keep posting whatever i feel like posting.If you dont like them then dont participate.I dont like this president and for good reason,its my opinion and ill state my reasons when i feel like it.
I think if you go whine and complain to Sepulation though i think you could probably get political threads or even me banned. So why dont you go and give that a shot and save your opinions of me and my post for someone who might give a rats ass.
 
reefraff

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by Veni Vidi Vici
http:///forum/post/3097946
If you think that these Czars that are being appointed arent something to be concerned with then by all means pass right over this thread.But if you take a look at some of these Czars one whom is a self proclaimed communist another who is a proponent of a One World Government then i dont know what to tell you.You are aware that these Czars that are being appointed are not required to answer to congress or anyone else other that the POTUS.
If that isnt disconcerting to ya then
dont read these types of posts.
Find better examples. You started this thread based on a passage in a book from before 90% of the people on this board was born.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top