presidential office....

[beth]

Personally, I think "where there is smoke, there is fire". Too many women coming out of the woodwork. You can say it is a conspiracy, however, why isn't that conspiracy leveled at some other candidate? Because there is no smoke with the other candidates.
I don't want a president who sexually harasses women. However, it will be up to Republicans in the primary to make that decision if he even gets the nomination, which I don't think he will.

 

[ironeagle2006]

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-11-09.html
Beth read this article then by Ann Coulter then When the ONLY person with a face is a Former Neighber of David Axelrod aka Obamas Former Chief of Staff there is SMOKE and it is coming out of the WHITE HOUSE. See if Cain wins the Nomination the White house loses a HUGE attack ad saying your Racist if your not for Obama. Axelrod and Obama have done this 2 times in the past First was to Blair Hull a Democrat in 2004 his Democratic Opponeant and next was also in 2004 when they did it again to Jack Ryan his GOP senate Opponant. They got SEALED divorce records UNSEALED to destory them So I would not put anything past the Obama whitehouse and the Chicago Machine of Democrats.

 

[darthtang aw]

Personally, I think "where there is smoke, there is fire".  Too many women coming out of the woodwork.  You can say it is a conspiracy, however, why isn't that conspiracy leveled at some other candidate?  Because there is no smoke with the other candidates.
I don't want a president who sexually harasses women.  However, it will be up to Republicans in the primary to make that decision if he even gets the nomination, which I don't think he will.
did you support clinton in his last term? was he a better presiden t than our last two?

 

[beth]

Clinton should have been found guilty of perjury and then impeached. Its a different situation. I'd want a moral person as president, and a sexual harasser lacks morals and is a predator. In this situation, Cain is not already voted in, so the ball is in the hands of Republicans who vote in the primaries. I would not give him my vote.

 

[morgan175]

Sorry Beth. Clinton was one of our better presidents in the last 30 years.

 

[meowzer]

Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan175 http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435278
Sorry Beth. Clinton was one of our better presidents in the last 30 years.
He is an embarrassment to the office IMO

 

[slice]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beth http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435272
Clinton should have been found guilty of perjury and then impeached. Its a different situation. I'd want a moral person as president, and a sexual harasser lacks morals and is a predator. In this situation, Cain is not already voted in, so the ball is in the hands of Republicans who vote in the primaries. I would not give him my vote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meowzer http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435281
He is an embarrassment to the office IMO
Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan175 http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435278
Sorry Beth. Clinton was one of our better presidents in the last 30 years.
Forget the perjury, the moral ineptness, the campaign fraud, the missing legal documents, the "suicide" in the WH, the...on and on...
These are the least of the Clinton legacy.
The lasting effect will haunt our children, our grandchildren and all future generations, I fear.
For overruling his own State Department time and time again to insist that sensitive missile guidance technology and hardened computer chip technology be given to China (which is now being used to threaten us as well as the entire asian region) goes far beyond crimes punishable by jail.
This is a treasonable offense.

 

[bang guy]

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBlitz33 http:///t/389032/presidential-office#post_3435204
Regardless of the whole Cain conspiracy, I still don't like his plans...
I think Mitt Romney has a really good chance of winning the election...
Mitt has had the blessing of the Republican party for quite some time now. Newt has a lot of warts but would be best for the country overall IMO.

 

[slice]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bang Guy http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435297
Newt has a lot of warts but would be best for the country overall IMO.
Amen

 

[bang guy]

Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan175 http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435278
Sorry Beth. Clinton was one of our better presidents in the last 30 years.
Reagan quintuppled our economy. It took Clinton 8 years of hard work to bring the economy to its knees after that.

 

[reefraff]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beth http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435272
Clinton should have been found guilty of perjury and then impeached. Its a different situation. I'd want a moral person as president, and a sexual harasser lacks morals and is a predator. In this situation, Cain is not already voted in, so the ball is in the hands of Republicans who vote in the primaries. I would not give him my vote.
Depends to me. I've seen some pretty absurd things claimed as sexual harassment. I don't find the woman Alred is hyping credible. I wanna see what the two actual women who filed complaints alleged.

 

[reefraff]

Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan175 http:///t/389032/presidential-office/20#post_3435278
Sorry Beth. Clinton was one of our better presidents in the last 30 years.
So was Nixon. You don't think he would have been impeached if he hadn't had sense enough to resign?