Republican Candidates
- Thread starter stdreb27
- Start date
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
It would of been proven if The UN inspectors were given more time. Bush didn't want that. So he told them to get their ass out & commenced to bomb Iraq so our troops can move in & stay. It was the plan from the beginning.
Ok, I am finally going to say it. You and your beliefs/views are the most uninformed decisions I have ever heard. Bush gave sadaam 6 months to allow the u.n inspectors to look at things, and Sadaam refused them on many occasions through that six months. He was not cooperating with Weapons inspectors....so how would the weapons inspectors found anything if they weren't allowed to look. They had ten years prior to that to look and confirm he had complied, yet he refused them those ten years....
It would of been proven if The UN inspectors were given more time. Bush didn't want that. So he told them to get their ass out & commenced to bomb Iraq so our troops can move in & stay. It was the plan from the beginning.
Ok, I am finally going to say it. You and your beliefs/views are the most uninformed decisions I have ever heard. Bush gave sadaam 6 months to allow the u.n inspectors to look at things, and Sadaam refused them on many occasions through that six months. He was not cooperating with Weapons inspectors....so how would the weapons inspectors found anything if they weren't allowed to look. They had ten years prior to that to look and confirm he had complied, yet he refused them those ten years....
stdreb27
Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
What makes you think your the only one in this conversation.
Check yourself.
You have to just be joking right?
you say these outlandish things, you get asked to back them up, you refuse saying, i'm not talking to you.
-Narrowminded and Right Idiot-
I'm right, I don't need an open mind.
What makes you think your the only one in this conversation.
Check yourself.
You have to just be joking right?
you say these outlandish things, you get asked to back them up, you refuse saying, i'm not talking to you.
-Narrowminded and Right Idiot-
I'm right, I don't need an open mind.
tarball
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
Ok, I am finally going to say it. You are an idiot. Bush gave sadaam 6 months to allow the u.n inspectors to look at things, and Sadaam refused them on many occasions through that six months. He was not cooperating with Weapons inspectors....so how would the weapons inspectors found anything if they weren't allowed to look. They had ten years prior to that to look and confirm he had complied, yet he refused them those ten years...You are a moron.
Once again watch the insults
The Inspectors weren't in Iraq more then 45 days the second time. Bush threatened Iraq for six months, & went to the united nations for their approval & didn't get it.
Ok, I am finally going to say it. You are an idiot. Bush gave sadaam 6 months to allow the u.n inspectors to look at things, and Sadaam refused them on many occasions through that six months. He was not cooperating with Weapons inspectors....so how would the weapons inspectors found anything if they weren't allowed to look. They had ten years prior to that to look and confirm he had complied, yet he refused them those ten years...You are a moron.
Once again watch the insults
The Inspectors weren't in Iraq more then 45 days the second time. Bush threatened Iraq for six months, & went to the united nations for their approval & didn't get it.
darthtang aw
Active Member
6 months equals roughly 180 days, why were they only there 45 and how many times did Sadaam kick them out or not grant access, again you dodged the issue. How does it Translate into bush lied and all his fault.
tarball
Member
You keep crying about proof. When it should clear by now if you educated yourself at all about this president.
So what will make you happy.
Do you need to read it on a piece of paper to believe, instead of using common sense.
Would a legitimate documentary with legitimate politicians speaking on the false documents mean anything to you.
I've dealt with many like you & always a waste of time.
So what will make you happy.
Do you need to read it on a piece of paper to believe, instead of using common sense.
Would a legitimate documentary with legitimate politicians speaking on the false documents mean anything to you.
I've dealt with many like you & always a waste of time.
darthtang aw
Active Member
Educated myself? Aree you for real, I have sited sources for my "education" of my views. You have yet to do that. not ONE LINK I am waiting on a report you said you could find ten of to contradict myself, yet you have yet to do that.
tarball
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
6 months equals roughly 180 days, why were they only there 45 and how many times did Sadaam kick them out or not grant access, again you dodged the issue. How does it Translate into bush lied and all his fault.
30 to 45 days is a far cry from 180 days, If inspectors were given 6 months we probably wouldn't have Americans dieing everyday in Iraq. And 100, 000 plus Iraqs would still be alive. Not to mention almost a trillion dollars saved on war. But Bush wanted war, Just like all on this thread. What a shame we have some many war minded people in this country now.
I guess couple billion dollars of war advertising works well.
How discouraging & disheartening.
6 months equals roughly 180 days, why were they only there 45 and how many times did Sadaam kick them out or not grant access, again you dodged the issue. How does it Translate into bush lied and all his fault.
30 to 45 days is a far cry from 180 days, If inspectors were given 6 months we probably wouldn't have Americans dieing everyday in Iraq. And 100, 000 plus Iraqs would still be alive. Not to mention almost a trillion dollars saved on war. But Bush wanted war, Just like all on this thread. What a shame we have some many war minded people in this country now.
I guess couple billion dollars of war advertising works well.
How discouraging & disheartening.
tarball
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
Educated myself? Aree you for real, I have sited sources for my "education" of my views. You have yet to do that. not ONE LINK I am waiting on a report you said you could find ten of to contradict myself, yet you have yet to do that.
I haven't made an attempt to discredit the report yet. Doesn't mean I can't. For the most part there is no proof how accurate the report is. If we found WMDs in Iraq it may have more validation. But for the most part its a lot of hear say, other then what i already commited on.
Educated myself? Aree you for real, I have sited sources for my "education" of my views. You have yet to do that. not ONE LINK I am waiting on a report you said you could find ten of to contradict myself, yet you have yet to do that.
I haven't made an attempt to discredit the report yet. Doesn't mean I can't. For the most part there is no proof how accurate the report is. If we found WMDs in Iraq it may have more validation. But for the most part its a lot of hear say, other then what i already commited on.
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
Educated myself? Aree you for real, I have sited sources for my "education" of my views. You have yet to do that. not ONE LINK I am waiting on a report you said you could find ten of to contradict myself, yet you have yet to do that.
I repeat myself again.
Also the inspectors had 10 YEARS. How much more time do they need? Sadaam only allowed them access to certain areas those 45 days, he did NOT give full disclosure as he was required to. If he had, Bush would have extended the deadline....once again, Sadaam and his regime had every oportunity.
You would give a guy on Probation a pass and blame the PO for him getting put in jail after he robbed a liquoor store I believe.
Educated myself? Aree you for real, I have sited sources for my "education" of my views. You have yet to do that. not ONE LINK I am waiting on a report you said you could find ten of to contradict myself, yet you have yet to do that.
I repeat myself again.
Also the inspectors had 10 YEARS. How much more time do they need? Sadaam only allowed them access to certain areas those 45 days, he did NOT give full disclosure as he was required to. If he had, Bush would have extended the deadline....once again, Sadaam and his regime had every oportunity.
You would give a guy on Probation a pass and blame the PO for him getting put in jail after he robbed a liquoor store I believe.
stdreb27
Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
Why isn't congress enough proof for you. They plainly say they were given false documentation. It was Porter Goss, Douglas Fieth, Paul Wolfowitz, ---- Cheney, & a whole host of Conservative republicans Providing the disinformation. Its a fact whether you like it or not.
yes, I consider, Nancy Peloci, Murtha, Kennedy (either one) Reid, Fiengold, honest, non-partisan ojective, people.
You know, thought, (may be more than you can handle) they have introduced 40 different resolutions trying to end the war in Iraq since the democrats regained power in congress. And yet they still have failed to pass one bill. Since it is proof enough for you, you might want to consider.
-Close Minded Idiot-
You don't need an open mind if you are already Right!
Why isn't congress enough proof for you. They plainly say they were given false documentation. It was Porter Goss, Douglas Fieth, Paul Wolfowitz, ---- Cheney, & a whole host of Conservative republicans Providing the disinformation. Its a fact whether you like it or not.
yes, I consider, Nancy Peloci, Murtha, Kennedy (either one) Reid, Fiengold, honest, non-partisan ojective, people.
You know, thought, (may be more than you can handle) they have introduced 40 different resolutions trying to end the war in Iraq since the democrats regained power in congress. And yet they still have failed to pass one bill. Since it is proof enough for you, you might want to consider.
-Close Minded Idiot-
You don't need an open mind if you are already Right!
darthtang aw
Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
I haven't made an attempt to discredit the report yet. Doesn't mean I can't. For the most part there is no proof how accurate the report is. If we found WMDs in Iraq it may have more validation. But for the most part its a lot of hear say, other then what i already commited on.
since 2003 we have found over 500 different forms of WMDs in various stages. One story to back that claim up.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
So there WERE wmds.
another link
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.as...20060621e.html
I haven't made an attempt to discredit the report yet. Doesn't mean I can't. For the most part there is no proof how accurate the report is. If we found WMDs in Iraq it may have more validation. But for the most part its a lot of hear say, other then what i already commited on.
since 2003 we have found over 500 different forms of WMDs in various stages. One story to back that claim up.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
So there WERE wmds.
another link
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.as...20060621e.html
tarball
Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
yes, I consider, Nancy Peloci, Murtha, Kennedy (either one) Reid, Fiengold, honest, non-partisan ojective, people.
You know, thought, (may be more than you can handle) they have introduced 40 different resolutions trying to end the war in Iraq since the democrats regained power in congress. And yet they still have failed to pass one bill. Since it is proof enough for you, you might want to consider.
-Close Minded Idiot-
You don't need an open mind if you are already Right!
I will agree the democrtes are turning into a small pile of crap, but nothing like the monstrouse pile of Dog sh*t the republican party is nowdays,
yes, I consider, Nancy Peloci, Murtha, Kennedy (either one) Reid, Fiengold, honest, non-partisan ojective, people.
You know, thought, (may be more than you can handle) they have introduced 40 different resolutions trying to end the war in Iraq since the democrats regained power in congress. And yet they still have failed to pass one bill. Since it is proof enough for you, you might want to consider.
-Close Minded Idiot-
You don't need an open mind if you are already Right!
I will agree the democrtes are turning into a small pile of crap, but nothing like the monstrouse pile of Dog sh*t the republican party is nowdays,
darthtang aw
Active Member
still waiting........
tarball
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
since 2003 we have found over 500 different forms of WMDs in various stages. One story to back that claim up.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
So there WERE wmds.
another link
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.as...20060621e.html
FOX news!!!!!....
get real..
since 2003 we have found over 500 different forms of WMDs in various stages. One story to back that claim up.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
So there WERE wmds.
another link
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.as...20060621e.html
FOX news!!!!!....
tarball
Member
Direct copy from the fox news report
The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.
It also said the material was depleted & not weaponised
The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.
It also said the material was depleted & not weaponised
darthtang aw
Active Member
It also shows HE was not complying with dismantling and disarmamnent...which backs our stance. regardless if it had depleted and some were pre 1991, he failed to comply. as intelligence stated. and WMDs were found.
as for the fox news comment, that is why I gave you 2 links.
as for the fox news comment, that is why I gave you 2 links.
tarball
Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
It also shows HE was not complying with dismantling and disarmamnent...which backs our stance. regardless if it had depleted and some were pre 1991, he failed to comply. as intelligence stated. and WMDs were found.
as for the fox news comment, that is why I gave you 2 links.
By no means am I standing up for saddam, But the mole hill that you are trying to make into a mountain in no way justifies the invasion.
But your point is understood.
I did understand they had found small caches of such materials but can't be considered weapons of mass destruction.
It also shows HE was not complying with dismantling and disarmamnent...which backs our stance. regardless if it had depleted and some were pre 1991, he failed to comply. as intelligence stated. and WMDs were found.
as for the fox news comment, that is why I gave you 2 links.
By no means am I standing up for saddam, But the mole hill that you are trying to make into a mountain in no way justifies the invasion.
But your point is understood.
I did understand they had found small caches of such materials but can't be considered weapons of mass destruction.